answer:I haven’t yet read the article and will google it more later when I have time. Right off the bat, my guess is that it’s considered armed robbery and a whole bunch of charges attached, so it was not like she randomly shot some guy by accident. She was robbing him and judges don’t usually look too kindly upon that (I’m guessing it was armed robbery). When I first read this, without reading article as I said I would later, I thought that she shot the guy as in “armed robbery.” When I see one of your tags saying “manslaughter” I am thinking what judge is going to let someone get away with robbing and killing someone? It would have been an accident if she were cleaning a gun and it just went off and killed the guy. Robbing the guy and then shooting him is not an accident, in my opinion. If she wasn’t robbing the guy, this wouldn’t have happened. Do we as a society want people running around loose who shoot and kill people for Playstations?