answer:Sadly, my experience is that very little is being done. Science has become so specialized and compartmentalized that many scientists have become almost idiot-savants, focussed laser-like on a single target, with astonishing levels of ignorance about topics which fall outside the narrowly-delineated areas of their expertise. The majority of the working scientists to whom I have spoken aren’t even aware of the existence of the philosophy of science, often dismissing me as a “pomo” (a pejorative term for a post-modernist) for, for example, differentiating between fact and truth. (This is extremely important, since empiricism, by definition, cannot make truth claims, truth being a metaphysical quality. Not coincidentally, this demonstrates why science is limited, and must be used in conjunction with both rationalism and revelation.) There are not many polymaths and renaissance men left in science; the few who are experts in multiple fields and capable of syngergizing disparate disciplines, like Roger Penrose, are generally controversial and aging rapidly. I am not optimistic about the state of science today.