With reference to Lok Adalats, which one among the following statements is correct? (1) Lok Adalats have the jurisdiction to settle the matters at pre-litigative state and not those matters pending before any court (2) Lok Adalats can deal with matters which are civil and not criminal in nature (3) Lok Adalats has not been given any statutory status so far (4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat

With reference to Lok Adalats, which one among the following statements is correct? (1) Lok Adalats have the jurisdiction to settle the matters at pre-litigative state and not those matters pending before any court (2) Lok Adalats can deal with matters which are civil and not criminal in nature (3) Lok Adalats has not been given any statutory status so far (4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat Explanation: Award has the same effect as of a Civil Court decree. The Supreme Court has held that award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of a Court. The award of the Lok Adalat is fictionally deemed to be decrees of Court and therefore the courts have all the powers in relation thereto as it has in relation to a decree passed by itself. It was the legal services authority act 1987, which gave statutory status to Lok Adalat.
by
selected by

Related questions

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other (3) between two or more States, if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Description : The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the ... (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Last Answer : (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument Explanation: Any dispute between the Union and one or more states comes under the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.

Which among the following court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha? (1) District Court of a constituency (2) High Court of the State (3) Special Judge authorised by the ChiefJustice of India (4) Supreme Court

Description : Which among the following court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha? (1) District Court of a constituency (2) High Court of the State (3) Special Judge authorised by the ChiefJustice of India (4) Supreme Court

Last Answer : (2) High Court of the State Explanation: The High Court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha.

The Supreme Court is empowered to settle election disputes of President and VicePresident. This is its – (1) Original Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Advisory Jurisdiction (4) Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Description : The Supreme Court is empowered to settle election disputes of President and VicePresident. This is its – (1) Original Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Advisory Jurisdiction (4) Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (1) Original Jurisdiction Explanation: Article 71 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that all doubts and disputes relating to election of a President or VicePresident are required to be enquired ... Supreme Court, which decides on the matter. The decision of the Supreme Court is final.

A proceeding under Article 226 in case of detention of a person is a – (1) Civil proceeding (2) Criminal proceeding (3) Judicial proceeding (4) Statutory proceeding

Description : A proceeding under Article 226 in case of detention of a person is a – (1) Civil proceeding (2) Criminal proceeding (3) Judicial proceeding (4) Statutory proceeding

Last Answer : (2) Criminal proceeding Explanation: Under the writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court intervenes and asks the authority to provide the reasons for such detention. All proceedings under Article 226 are ... asks for any other writ than the Habeas Corpus, the proceedings are necessarily civil proceedings.

Which one among the following statements is not correct? The word 'socialist' in the Preamble of the Constitution of India read with - (1) Article 39 (d), would enable the court to uphold the constitutionality of nationalization laws (2) Article 14, would enable the court to strike down a-statute which failed to achieve the socialist goal to the fullest extent (3) Article 25, would enable the court to ensure freedom guaranteed under that Article (4) Article 23, would enable the court to reduce inequality in income and status

Description : Which one among the following statements is not correct? The word 'socialist' in the Preamble of the Constitution of India read with - (1) Article 39 (d), would enable the court to uphold the ... under that Article (4) Article 23, would enable the court to reduce inequality in income and status

Last Answer : (4) Article 23, would enable the court to reduce inequality in income and status. Explanation: Traffic in human beings and beggars and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any ... . Thus, the word Socialist in the preamble of the Constitution of India read with Article 23.

Articles 74 and 75 of Indian Constitution deal with matters of – (1) the Council of Ministers (2) the Speaker of Lok Sabha (3) the President of India (4) the Cabinet Ministers

Description : Articles 74 and 75 of Indian Constitution deal with matters of – (1) the Council of Ministers (2) the Speaker of Lok Sabha (3) the President of India (4) the Cabinet Ministers

Last Answer : (1) the Council of Ministers Explanation: Article 74 of the Constitution of the Republic of India provides for a Council of Ministers which shall aid the President in the exercise of his ... 75 states that the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People.

An appeal to the High Court lies in case the Session Court has awarded the punishment of – (1) one year or more (2) two years or more (3) three years or more (4) four years or more

Description : An appeal to the High Court lies in case the Session Court has awarded the punishment of – (1) one year or more (2) two years or more (3) three years or more (4) four years or more

Last Answer : (4) four years or more Explanation: Under various Central and State enactments, the High Court has been conferred with appellate as well as revisional jurisdiction. Any person convicted on a trial held by a ... or against any other person convicted at the same trial] ; may appeal to the High Court.

Under which jurisdiction can a High Court accept an appeal against the decision of the district court? -SST 10th

Description : Under which jurisdiction can a High Court accept an appeal against the decision of the district court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Under Appellate Judgement (both civil and criminal) the High Courts can accept appeals against the decisions of the lower courts. In civil cases the High Courts hear the appeals against the decisions of ... also lie to the High Court, when the order of acquittal is passed by a Sessions judge.

Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a federal system? (1) There are two distinct levels of government (2) The responsibilities and powers of each level of government are clearly defined in a written Constitution (3) There is no separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government (4) A Supreme Court is entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting these provisions and arbitrating in matters of dispute

Description : Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a federal system? (1) There are two distinct levels of government (2) The responsibilities and powers of each level of ... Court is entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting these provisions and arbitrating in matters of dispute

Last Answer : (3) There is no separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government Explanation: One of the features of the federal system is the distribution of power ... importance. Both federal and state governments functioning strictly within the sphere demarcated for them.

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

Who can legislate on those residual matters which are not mentioned in Central/ State/Concurrent lists? (1) State legislatures exclusively (2) Parliament alone (3) Parliament after State legislatures concur (4) Parliament or State legislatures as adjudicated by the Supreme Court

Description : Who can legislate on those residual matters which are not mentioned in Central/ State/Concurrent lists? (1) State legislatures exclusively (2) Parliament alone (3) Parliament after State legislatures concur (4) Parliament or State legislatures as adjudicated by the Supreme Court

Last Answer : (4) Parliament or State legislatures as adjudicated by the Supreme Court Explanation: The constitution vests the residuary power, i.e., the power to legislate with respect to any matter not enumerated ... to determine finally as to whether a particular matter falls under the residuary, power or not.

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

In relation to offences described under Section 175, Section 178, Section 179, Section 180 or Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code, the Human Rights Commission is to be deemed – (1) Criminal Court (2) Civil Court (3) Revenue Court (4) None of the above

Description : In relation to offences described under Section 175, Section 178, Section 179, Section 180 or Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code, the Human Rights Commission is to be deemed – (1) Criminal Court (2) Civil Court (3) Revenue Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (2) Civil Court Explanation: In relation to offences described under Section 175, Section 178, Section 180 or Section 228 of the Indian panel code, the human rights commission is to deemed civil court.

Lok Adalats have been created under

Description : Lok Adalats have been created under

Last Answer : Legal Services Authority Act

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

Which one of the following is a subject of the concurrent list? (1) Police (2) Criminal matters (3) Radio and Television (4) Foreign Affairs.

Description : Which one of the following is a subject of the concurrent list? (1) Police (2) Criminal matters (3) Radio and Television (4) Foreign Affairs.

Last Answer : (2) Criminal matters Explanation: Criminal matters is a subject of the concurrent list.

In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Description : In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Last Answer : (3) Both (1) and (b) Explanation: The Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award in the case of interstate river water disputes and delimitation of constitution.

The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Methods of statistical sampling to be used in confirming accounts receivable. b. Pending legal matters to be included in the inquiry of the client's attorney. c. Evidence to be gathered to provide a sufficient basis for the auditor's opinion. d. Schedules and analyses to be prepared by the client's staf

Description : The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Methods of statistical sampling to be used ... for the auditor's opinion. d. Schedules and analyses to be prepared by the client's staf

Last Answer : Schedules and analyses to be prepared by the client's staf

The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Procedures to be undertaken to discover litigation, claims, and assessments. b. Timing of inventory observation procedures to be performed. c. Evidence to be gathered to provide asufficient basis for the auditor's opinion.d. Pending legal matters to be included inthe inquiry of the client's attorney.

Description : The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Procedures to be undertaken to discover ... opinion. d. Pending legal matters to be included in the inquiry of the client's attorney.

Last Answer : Timing of inventory observation procedures to be performed

The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Timing of inventory observation procedures to be performedb. Evidence to be gathered to provide asufficient basis for the auditor's opinion.c. Procedures to be undertaken to discoverlitigation, claims, and assessments.d. Pending legal matters to be included inthe inquiry of the client's attorney

Description : The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is the determination of the a. Timing of inventory observation ... assessments. d. Pending legal matters to be included in the inquiry of the client's attorney

Last Answer : Timing of inventory observation procedures to be performed.

Which of the following statements are correct about the National Advisory Council (NAC) ? 1. The National Advisory Council is a statutory body. 2. It is headed by the Prime Minister of India. 3. It facilitates constant interaction with the leaders of civil society. 4. It provides policy and legislative inputs to the Government of India. Select the correct answer from the code given below : Codes : (A) 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1, 3 and 4 (D) 3 and 4

Description : Which of the following statements are correct about the National Advisory Council (NAC) ? 1. The National Advisory Council is a statutory body. 2. It is headed by the Prime Minister of India. 3. It facilitates constant interaction with the ... 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1, 3 and 4 (D) 3 and 4

Last Answer : Answer: D 

With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. (3) The minimum age prescribed for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court is 40 years. (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Description : With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses ... (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Last Answer : (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. Explanation: President can promulgate ordinances when the parliament is not in session. ... take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require.

Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation and business (2) Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Description : Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation ... any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Last Answer : (4) Freedom of the press Explanation: The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution.

The following persons are not judge a) A collector b) A magistrate exercising jurisdiction in /ro a charge on which he has power to sentence to fine or imprisonment, with or without appeal c) A member of a panchayat which has power under regulation VII of madras code. d) A Magistrate exercising jurisdiction in respect of a charge on which he has power only to commit for trial to another court.

Description : The following persons are not judge a) A collector  b) A magistrate exercising jurisdiction in /ro a charge on which he has power to  sentence to fine or imprisonment, with or without appeal c) ... in respect of a charge on which he has power  only to commit for trial to another court.

Last Answer : d) A Magistrate exercising jurisdiction in respect of a charge on which he has power  only to commit for trial to another court.

Which Courts have Original Jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases? -SST 10th

Description : Which Courts have Original Jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Presidency High Courts have Original Jurisdiction in almost all civil and criminal cases.

How do the Lok Adalats function? -SST 10th

Description : How do the Lok Adalats function? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Functioning of Lok Adalat: Lok Adalats are presided over by judicial officers and other persons, who possess such qualifications as may be prescribed by the State. They make an endeavour to ... vehicles accident cases, compensation amounting to more than a thousand crore of rupees was awarded.

Discuss in brief about the scope of Lok Adalats. -SST 10th

Description : Discuss in brief about the scope of Lok Adalats. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The concept of Lok Adalat is Gandhian in spirit and is consistent with the ideals enshrined in the Constitution of India. It is an extension of the Panchayat spirit in the ... ameliorate the conditions of farm workers and unorganized workers of different sectors through their human approach.

Discuss about the advantages of Lok Adalats. -SST 10th

Description : Discuss about the advantages of Lok Adalats. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Lok Adalats have been functioning in Delhi, Gujarat and some other States. They have the following advantages: (i) The Lok Adalats work in the spirit of compromise and understanding, as a result both ... Courts of the heavy backlog of the cases. (iv) It reduces delay in the disposal of cases.

One High Court may have jurisdiction over two or more states if the following so decides - (1) President of India (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court (4) The states involved

Description : One High Court may have jurisdiction over two or more states if the following so decides - (1) President of India (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court (4) The states involved

Last Answer : (2) Parliament Explanation: Jurisdiction over two or more states.

In the new Panchayati Raj Bill enacted in 1993, there are several fresh provisions deviating from the past. Which one of the following is not one such provisions? (1) A number of added responsibilities in the area of agriculture rural development, primary education and social forestry among other (2) Elections being made mandatory for all posts at the time they are due (3) A statutory representation for women in the panchayats, up to a third of the strength (4) Regular remuneration to the panchayat members, so as to ensure their punctuality and accountability

Description : In the new Panchayati Raj Bill enacted in 1993, there are several fresh provisions deviating from the past. Which one of the following is not one such provisions? (1) A number of ... strength (4) Regular remuneration to the panchayat members, so as to ensure their punctuality and accountability

Last Answer : (4) Regular remuneration to the panchayat members, so as to ensure their punctuality and accountability Explanation: Provision given in option (4) is not included under 73rd amendment act 1993.

When the posts of both the President and the Vice President are vacant who among the following officiates as President? (1) The Chief Justice of Supreme Court (2) The Lt. Governor of Delhi (3) The Speaker of Lok Sabha (4) The Prime Minister

Description : When the posts of both the President and the Vice President are vacant who among the following officiates as President? (1) The Chief Justice of Supreme Court (2) The Lt. Governor of Delhi (3) The Speaker of Lok Sabha (4) The Prime Minister

Last Answer : (1) The Chief Justice of Supreme Court Explanation: The constitution of India provides that the Chief Justice of India shall act as the President of India in the event of the offices of both the President ... . Zakir Hussain, died in office, the Vice President, Mr. VV Giri, acted as the President.

When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised by the chief justice of India. (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Description : When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised ... power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Last Answer : (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State Explanation: According to Article 227(b), the Chief Justice of High Court when acts in an administrative capacity, any rules made by him ... inconsistent with the provision of any law in force and requires the previous approval of the governor.

Which one of the following is NOT the main jurisdiction of the High Court of a state? (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Original Jurisdiction (3) Supervisory Jurisdiction (4) Appellate Jurisdiction

Description : Which one of the following is NOT the main jurisdiction of the High Court of a state? (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Original Jurisdiction (3) Supervisory Jurisdiction (4) Appellate Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (1) Advisory Jurisdiction Explanation: The High Court of India does not have advisory jurisdiction. It has original, appellate and supervisory jurisdiction only. Supervisory jurisdiction refers to power of superior courts of general superintendence over all subordinate courts.

The jurisdiction of state high court can be extended by (1) Parliament (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Governor of the state (4) The President of India.

Description : The jurisdiction of state high court can be extended by (1) Parliament (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Governor of the state (4) The President of India.

Last Answer : (1) Parliament Explanation: The Parliament may make a provision for a common High Court for two or more States or extend the jurisdiction of a High Court to one or more Union Territories.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the State falls under its ________. (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the State falls under its ________. (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (4) Original Jurisdiction Explanation: The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its original jurisdiction. The original jurisdiction of a court is ... or judge to pronounce the sentence of law, provided by law upon a state of facts.

Which High Court has jurisdiction over the State of Arunachal Pradesh? (1) Guwahati (2) Mumbai (3) Kolkata (4) Chandigarh

Description : Which High Court has jurisdiction over the State of Arunachal Pradesh? (1) Guwahati (2) Mumbai (3) Kolkata (4) Chandigarh

Last Answer : (1) Guwahati Explanation: The Guwahati High Court was established on 1 March, 1948 after the Government of India Act 1935 was passed. It was originally known as the High Court of Assam and Nagaland, but renamed as Gauhati High Court in 1971.

Impeachment Proceedings against the President for violation of the Constitution can be intiated in : (1) Either House of Parliament (2) The Lok Sabha (3) The Rajya Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Description : Impeachment Proceedings against the President for violation of the Constitution can be intiated in : (1) Either House of Parliament (2) The Lok Sabha (3) The Rajya Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Last Answer : (1) Either House of Parliament Explanation ; According to Article 61 of Indian Constitution, when a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either ... passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.

Mention one reason why the system of Lok Adalat has become popular. -SST 10th

Description : Mention one reason why the system of Lok Adalat has become popular. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Lok Adalat has become popular because it works in the spirit of compromise and delivers Speedy and inexpensive justice.

Give two advantages of the Lok Adalat System of dispensing Justice. -SST 10th

Description : Give two advantages of the Lok Adalat System of dispensing Justice. -SST 10th

Last Answer : (i) Time and money is saved. (ii) The different Lok Adalat have relieved the law courts much of their heavy load of work.

What is meant by Lok Adalat? -SST 10th

Description : What is meant by Lok Adalat? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Lok Adalat: Lok Adalat means People's Court'. On the recommendation of Justice Bhagwati, Lok Adalats were set-up to provide legal and quick justice to those who are not in a ... at places like factories, farms, commercial complexes to settle disputes in the spirit of harmony and compromise.

What is meant by Lok Adalat? -SST 10th

Description : What is meant by Lok Adalat? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Lok Adalats are presided over by judicial officers and other persons, who possess such qualifications as may be prescribed by the State. They make an endeavour to bring compromise or agreement ... vehicles accident cases, compensation amounting to more than a thousand crore of rupees was awarded.

The monetary ceiling of amount for settlement through Lok Adalat is _________ A. 5 lakh B. 10 lakh C. 15 lakh D. 20 lakh E. None of the Above

Description : The monetary ceiling of amount for settlement through Lok Adalat is _________ A. 5 lakh B. 10 lakh C. 15 lakh D. 20 lakh E. None of the Above

Last Answer : D. 20 lakh Explanation: The monetary ceiling of amount for settlement through Lok Adalat is INR 20 Lakh

Which of the following statements is not correct? (1) In Lok Sabha, a no-confidence motion has to set out the grounds on which it is based. (2) In the case of a no-confidence motion in Lok Sabha, no conditions of admissibility have been laid down in the rules. (3) A motion of no-confidence once admitted has to be taken up within ten days of leave being granted. (4) Rayya Sabha is not empowered to entertain a motion of no-confidence.

Description : Which of the following statements is not correct? (1) In Lok Sabha, a no-confidence motion has to set out the grounds on which it is based. (2) In the case of a no-confidence motion in Lok ... ten days of leave being granted. (4) Rayya Sabha is not empowered to entertain a motion of no-confidence.

Last Answer : (1) In Lok Sabha, a noconfidence motion has to set out the grounds on which it is based Explanation: ‘No-confidence motion’ need not state the reason for it being adopted in the Lok Sabha.

Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Description : Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Criminal Courts: From 31st March, 1973, a new Criminal Procedure Act came into effect. Criminal Courts deal with criminal cases. These courts are divided into four categories: The Session Courts: The Session ... rioting. He can award imprisonment for not more than one month and a fine upto Rs. 50.

Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Description : Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Last Answer : (4) against a general topic Explanation: Although the proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or orders made by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of ... India only and perhaps no other Court in the world has been exercising this extraordinary jurisdiction.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its - (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its - (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (4) Original Jurisdiction Explanation: The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be categorised as original, appellate and advisory. Under the Original Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court can settle disputes (1) between the ... one or more other States on the other; or (3) between two or more States.

The power to enlarge the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India with respect to any matter included in the Union list of legislative powers rests with: (1) The President of India (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Parliament (4) The Union Ministry of Law

Description : The power to enlarge the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India with respect to any matter included in the Union list of legislative powers rests with: (1) The President of India (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Parliament (4) The Union Ministry of Law

Last Answer : (3) The Parliament Explanation: The parliament can regulate the organization and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It can expand the jurisdiction but can't curtail the same.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its : (1) Advisory jurisdiction (2) Appellate jurisdiction (3) Original jurisdiction (4) Constitutional jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its : (1) Advisory jurisdiction (2) Appellate jurisdiction (3) Original jurisdiction (4) Constitutional jurisdiction

Last Answer : (3) Original jurisdiction Explanation: Under Article 131, disputes between different units of the Federation will be within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Subject to the provisions of this ... one or more other States on the other; or (3) between two or more States.

The Supreme Court of India enjoys - (1) Original jurisdiction (2) Advisory jurisdiction (3) Appellate and advisory jurisdictions (4) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.

Description : The Supreme Court of India enjoys - (1) Original jurisdiction (2) Advisory jurisdiction (3) Appellate and advisory jurisdictions (4) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.

Last Answer : (4) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions. Explanation: The Supreme Court has originally jurisdiction i.e. cases which can originate with the Supreme Court alone over disputes between the Government of India ... and states on one side and one or more state on the other two or more states.

Which one of the following is related to Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? (1) Speaker of the Parliament seeking opinion from the Supreme Court (2) Election Commission seeking opinion from the Supreme Court (3) States seeking opinion from the Supereme Court (4) President of on India seeks opinion law or facts

Description : Which one of the following is related to Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? (1) Speaker of the Parliament seeking opinion from the Supreme Court (2) Election Commission seeking opinion from the ... seeking opinion from the Supereme Court (4) President of on India seeks opinion law or facts

Last Answer : (4) President of on India seeks opinion law or facts Explanation: The Supreme Court has special advisory jurisdiction in matters which may specifically be referred to it by the President of India under ... , nor is it "law declared by the Supreme Court", hence not binding on subordinate courts.