No. As for your referenced case: “Justice Hulme referred to Da-Pra’s mental illness, for which he is on medication, and also to his chronic cannabis use.” And: ”At today’s sentencing, Justice Robert Shallcross Hulme said Da-Pra had no prior criminal record and no history of violence. He said Da-Pra was on a disability pension after a bike accident, and was remorseful and unlikely to reoffend.” All in all, the sentence seems fine to me. Of course the familiy thinks the sentence is too “lenient”. They are emotional and do not see this matter objectively. That is why the victims and their families do not get to decide court senteces in a just and fair justice system.