answer:I don’t see how it would be possible. Six billion “non chess players”? By definition, then, most of their proposed moves would be illegal, bordering on random. How could they even vote on which move they liked better than others if they don’t even understand the fundamentals of the game? If they weren’t playing such a structured game, then they’d have a chance to beat an expert. Let’s propose instead “Could six billion people make a better guess on US foreign policy outcomes than the US President?” ... and almost unquestionably, I think, they could. Notice the wording. The US President can have absolute authority over the foreign policy decisions he makes, but the rest of the world will have a better idea of the results. The game isn’t so rigged; anyone can guess at nearly any outcome, and outcomes are not necessarily straight-line functions of the moves made, either, as they are in chess.