Role of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to connect accused to the alleged incident. a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Role of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to 

connect accused to the alleged incident.

a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh

b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar

c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal

d) None of these
by

1 Answer

Answer :

a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh
by

Related questions

Implied admission in written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn. However, the plaintiff can be insisted upon to prove his case a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan. b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Implied admission in written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn.  However, the plaintiff can be insisted upon to prove his case a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan. b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan.

Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic  destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar

Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only by leading secondary evidence in case of a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to  be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only  by leading secondary evidence in ... . State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti

The conduct of an eye witness in non disclosing the incident to anybody for a number of days. In highly unnatural on and is sufficient to reject testimony a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Ganpat Kndiba Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra d) None of these

Description : The conduct of an eye witness in non disclosing the incident to anybody for a  number of days. In highly unnatural on and is sufficient to reject testimony a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Jai ... Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Ganpat Kndiba Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra d) None of these

Last Answer : c) Ganpat Kndiba Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Admission of documents amounts to admission of contents but not its truth a) LIC of india Vs. Narmada Agarwala b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : Admission of documents amounts to admission of contents but not its truth  a) LIC of india Vs. Narmada Agarwala b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : a) LIC of india Vs. Narmada Agarwala

A man may lie but a document will never lie in case of a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : A man may lie but a document will never lie in case of a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal

A is accused of waging war against the Government of India by taking part in and armed in surrection. In which property is destroyed, Troops are attached and goals are broken open. A is not present at all of them yet occurrence of these facts is relevant because- a) They constitute a motive for relevant fact b) They show preparation for relevant facts c) They are effect of relevant facts d) They form part of general transaction

Description : A is accused of waging war against the Government of India by taking part in and  armed in surrection. In which property is destroyed, Troops are attached and goals are  broken open. A is not ... for relevant facts c) They are effect of relevant facts d) They form part of general transaction

Last Answer : d) They form part of general transaction

The burden lies on prosecution to prove that actual participation of more that one person for commission of criminal act was done in furtherance of common intention at a prior concert. a) State of orissa v. Arjun Das, b) Keshav barathi v. state of maharashtra c) Kansaheb Kalu Patil v. state of maharashtra d) None of these

Description : The burden lies on prosecution to prove that actual participation of more that one  person for commission of criminal act was done in furtherance of common intention at a  prior concert. a) State of ... v. state of maharashtra c) Kansaheb Kalu Patil v. state of maharashtra d) None of these

Last Answer : a) State of orissa v. Arjun Das,

Which of following is not hearsay evidence? a) Statement of police that on basis of inquiry conducted by him that accused was not at home on night of incident b) Report of newspaper c) Report prepared on basis of information provided by officer

Description : Which of following is not hearsay evidence? a) Statement of police that on basis of inquiry conducted by him that accused was not  at home on night of incident b) Report of newspaper c) Report prepared on basis of information provided by officer

Last Answer : c) Report prepared on basis of information provided by officer

A criminal prosecution in a non-cognizable case should not be instituted without the previous sanction of the a) Head of the Circle/Regional PMG b) SSP/SP c) Sub divisional inspector d) None of these

Description : A criminal prosecution in a non-cognizable case should not be instituted without the previous sanction of the a) Head of the Circle/Regional PMG b) SSP/SP c) Sub divisional inspector d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Head of the Circle/Regional PMG

why Mr. A is accused of murder. One of the evidence presented is a death threat signed by the culprit. Can the prosecution compel him to submit a specimen of his signature?

Description : why Mr. A is accused of murder. One of the evidence presented is a death threat signed by the culprit. Can the prosecution compel him to submit a specimen of his signature?

Last Answer : WHAT!!!

The movement which as a proponent of social reform and women’s emancipation is [A] The young Andra Movement [B] The Young Bengal Movement [C] The young Tripuri Movement [D] The Young Mizo Movement

Description : The movement which as a proponent of social reform and women’s emancipation is [A] The young Andra Movement [B] The Young Bengal Movement [C] The young Tripuri Movement [D] The Young Mizo Movement

Last Answer : [B] The Young Bengal Movement

In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months

Description : In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a  fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months

Last Answer : (d) Six months.

In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding Rs. 100 but exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months.

Description : In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a  fine of not exceeding Rs. 100 but exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of  payment of fine shall not exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months.

Last Answer : (c) Four months

In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months.

Description : In case of an offence punished with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a  fine of not exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not  exceed (a) Two months (b) Three months (c) Four months (d) Six months.

Last Answer : (a) Two months

In case of an offence punished with fine only, imprisonment for non-payment of fine (a) Has to be rigorous (b) Has to be simple (c) Has be rigorous or simple (d) Has be partly rigorous and partly simple.

Description : In case of an offence punished with fine only, imprisonment for non-payment of  fine (a) Has to be rigorous (b) Has to be simple (c) Has be rigorous or simple (d) Has be partly rigorous and partly simple.

Last Answer : (b) Has to be simple

In every case of offence offender punished a) With imprisonment only b) With fine only c) With imprisonment or fine or both d) None of these

Description : In every case of offence offender punished a) With imprisonment only b) With fine only c) With imprisonment or fine or both d) None of these

Last Answer : c) With imprisonment or fine or both

A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses a commission of a non cognizable offence after investigation shall deemed to be (a) Police report (b) Charge sheet (c) Complaint (d) Final report

Description : A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses a commission of a non  cognizable offence after investigation shall deemed to be (a) Police report (b) Charge sheet  (c) Complaint (d) Final report

Last Answer : (c) Complaint

An offence a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant a) Criminal case b) Non cognizable case c) Cognizable case d) Half murder case

Description : An offence a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant  a) Criminal case b) Non cognizable case c) Cognizable case d) Half murder case

Last Answer : b) Non cognizable case

A case relating to an offence, and not being a warrant case is a a) Warrant Case b) Offence Case c) Summons Case d) None of these

Description : A case relating to an offence, and not being a warrant case is a a) Warrant Case b) Offence Case c) Summons Case d) None of these

Last Answer : c) Summons Case

Which case is related to Fundamental Rights? (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) (2) 'West Bengal vs. Union of India (1963) (3) Sharma vs. Krishna (1959) (4) State of Bombay vs. Balsara

Description : Which case is related to Fundamental Rights? (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) (2) 'West Bengal vs. Union of India (1963) (3) Sharma vs. Krishna (1959) (4) State of Bombay vs. Balsara

Last Answer : (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) Explanation: In the famous case of Golaknath V. State Of Punjab, -in 1967 the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in ... a "law" under the meaning of Article 13(2) and whether Fundamental Rights can be amended or not.

A person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has bee charge and the expression a) Victim b) Warrant Case c) Summons Case d) None of these

Description : A person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or  omission for which the accused person has bee charge and the expression a) Victim b) Warrant Case c) Summons Case d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Victim

If digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic record, fact must be proved- a) That such digital signature is original signature b) That such signature is original c) That signature is no digital d) That signature is digital

Description : If digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic  record, fact must be proved- a) That such digital signature is original signature b) That such signature is original c) That signature is no digital d) That signature is digital

Last Answer : a) That such digital signature is original signature

In proceedings under IPO Act 1898 for recovery of any postage or other sum alleged to be due in respect of a postal article: (A) The presence of an officer of the Post office concerned shall be prima facie evidence under the said Act (B) The presence of an official of the Post Office concerned shall be prima facie evidence under the said Act (C) The production of the postal article, having thereon the official mark of the post office denoting that the article has been refused or that the addressee is dead or cannot be found, shall be prima facie evidence under the said Act (D) The statement under (A) & (B) above is correct

Description : In proceedings under IPO Act 1898 for recovery of any postage or other sum alleged to be due in respect of a postal article: (A) The presence of an officer of the Post office concerned shall be prima ... prima facie evidence under the said Act (D) The statement under (A) & (B) above is correct

Last Answer : (C) The production of the postal article, having thereon the official mark of the post office denoting that the article has been refused or that the addressee is dead or cannot be found, shall be prima facie evidence under the said Act

Assuming that the document is more than thirty years old and comes from proper custody, there would be no presumption that contents of the same are true a) Mohinuddin Vs President , Municipal comity b) Shatala Vs. State of maharashtra c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : Assuming that the document is more than thirty years old and comes from proper  custody, there would be no presumption that contents of the same are true  a) Mohinuddin Vs President , Municipal comity ... State of maharashtra c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Mohinuddin Vs President , Municipal comity

The disqualification of the member is a) Has been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for an offence which , in the opinion of the state govt involves moral turpitude b) Is an undercharged insolvent c) Is of unsound mind d) All the above

Description : The disqualification of the member is a) Has been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for an offence which , in the opinion of the state govt involves moral turpitude  b) Is an undercharged insolvent c) Is of unsound mind d) All the above

Last Answer : d) All the above

Punishment of offence made up of several offence is a) Offender shall be punished with a more severe punishment. b) Offender shall be punished with any one of such offences c) Offender shall be punished with all offence one by one d) None of these

Description : Punishment of offence made up of several offence is a) Offender shall be punished with a more severe punishment. b) Offender shall be punished with any one of such offences c) Offender shall be punished with all offence one by one d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Offender shall be punished with any one of such offences

Under section 8 the following are relevant a) Motive b) Preparation c) Previous conduct d) Subsequent conduct e) All the above

Description : Under section 8 the following are relevant a) Motive b) Preparation c) Previous conduct d) Subsequent conduct e) All the above

Last Answer : e) All the above

Under section 8 of Evidence Act- a) Preparation is relevant b) conduct is relevant c) Motive is relevant d) All the above

Description : Under section 8 of Evidence Act- a) Preparation is relevant b) conduct is relevant c) Motive is relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : d) All the above

To what of following rules of relevancy have been discussed under section 8 of Indian evidence act a) Motive b) Preparation c) Previous or subsequent conduct d) All the above

Description : To what of following rules of relevancy have been discussed under section 8 of  Indian evidence act a) Motive b) Preparation c) Previous or subsequent conduct d) All the above

Last Answer : d) All the above

The question is whether A committed a crime at Calcutta on a curtain day, fact that on that day A was at Lahore is relevant- a) As a motive for fact in issue b) As introductory to fact in issue c) As preparation of relevant fact d) As it makes existence of fact in issue highly improbable

Description : The question is whether A committed a crime at Calcutta on a curtain day, fact that  on that day A was at Lahore is relevant- a) As a motive for fact in issue b) As introductory to fact in issue c) As preparation of relevant fact d) As it makes existence of fact in issue highly improbable

Last Answer : d) As it makes existence of fact in issue highly improbable

A inscription on metal plate or stone a) Is a fact b) Is a document c) Is an opinion d) Is a motive

Description : A inscription on metal plate or stone a) Is a fact b) Is a document c) Is an opinion d) Is a motive

Last Answer : b) Is a document

That there are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place- a) Is a fact b) Is an opinion c) Is a document d) Is a motive

Description : That there are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place- a) Is a fact b) Is an opinion c) Is a document d) Is a motive

Last Answer : a) Is a fact

Which one of the following statements regarding section 34 and section 149 of Indian Penal Code is correct? a) Common intention and common object are same b) Both are distinct offences in themselves c) Section 34 enunciates a mere principle of liability and creates no offence while section 149 creates a specific offence. d) Section 34 and 149 are mutually halping sections.

Description : Which one of the following statements regarding section 34 and section 149 of  Indian Penal Code is correct? a) Common intention and common object are same b) Both are distinct offences in ... section 149 creates a specific offence. d) Section 34 and 149 are mutually halping sections.

Last Answer : c) Section 34 enunciates a mere principle of liability and creates no offence while  section 149 creates a specific offence.

Enhanced punishment for certain offence under Chapter XII or Chapter XVII after previous conviction a) 3 years upwards b) 4 year upwards c) 1 year upwards d) None of these

Description : Enhanced punishment for certain offence under Chapter XII or Chapter XVII after previous conviction  a) 3 years upwards b) 4 year upwards c) 1 year upwards d) None of these 

Last Answer : a) 3 years upwards

In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the offender shall be punished for the offence a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all b) For which the highest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all c) Shall be reduced but subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of reduction d) None of the above

Description : In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several  offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is  guilty, the offender ... subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of  reduction d) None of the above

Last Answer : a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all

Under section 65 of IPC sentence of imprisonment for non-payment of fine shall be limited to (a) One-third of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (b) One-fourth of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (c) One-half of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (d) Equal to the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence.

Description : Under section 65 of IPC sentence of imprisonment for non-payment of fine shall be  limited to (a) One-third of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (b) One-fourth of the ... imprisonment fixed for the offence (d) Equal to the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence.

Last Answer : (b) One-fourth of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence

Illegal signifies (a) Everything which is an offence (b) Everything which is prohibited by law (c) Everything which furnishes ground for civil action (d) All the above.

Description : Illegal signifies (a) Everything which is an offence (b) Everything which is prohibited by law (c) Everything which furnishes ground for civil action (d) All the above.

Last Answer : (b) Everything which is prohibited by law

Offence defined in sec _____of IPC (a) Section 39 (b) Section 38 (c) Section 37 (d) Section 40.

Description : Offence defined in sec _____of IPC (a) Section 39 (b) Section 38 (c) Section 37 (d) Section 40.

Last Answer : (d) Section 40.

Effect caused partly by act and partly by omission is a) The effect caused partly by act is offence b) The effect caused partly by omission is offence c) Both a & b d) Neither a nor b

Description : Effect caused partly by act and partly by omission is  a) The effect caused partly by act is offence b) The effect caused partly by omission is offence c) Both a & b d) Neither a nor b

Last Answer : c) Both a & b

Section 34 of IPC (a) Creates a substantive offence (b) Is a rule of evidence (c) Both (a) and (b) (d) Neither (a) nor (b).

Description : Section 34 of IPC (a) Creates a substantive offence (b) Is a rule of evidence (c) Both (a) and (b) (d) Neither (a) nor (b).

Last Answer : (d) Neither (a) nor (b

General exception of this code provides that nothing shall be an offence which is done by a) Under 18 years b) Under 16 years c) Under 10 years d) Under 7 years

Description : General exception of this code provides that nothing shall be an offence which is  done by  a) Under 18 years b) Under 16 years c) Under 10 years d) Under 7 years

Last Answer : d) Under 7 years

Any police officer may arrest without warrant any person (a) Who has been concerned in any cognizable offence (b) Who has been proclaimed as an offender (c) Who is reasonably suspected of being a deserter from any armed forces (d) All the above

Description : Any police officer may arrest without warrant any person (a) Who has been concerned in any cognizable offence (b) Who has been proclaimed as an offender (c) Who is reasonably suspected of being a deserter from any armed forces (d) All the above

Last Answer : (d) All the above

Any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may be legally taken on oath a) Investigation b) Offence c) Judicial proceeding d) All the above

Description : Any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may be legally taken on oath a) Investigation b) Offence c) Judicial proceeding d) All the above

Last Answer : c) Judicial proceeding

Any act or omission made punishable by any law for time being in force is called a) Allegation b) Inquiry c) Complaint d) Offence

Description : Any act or omission made punishable by any law for time being in force is called a) Allegation b) Inquiry c) Complaint d) Offence

Last Answer : d) Offence

Offence is defined in………………..of Criminal Code procedure 1973 a) 2(a) b) 2(b) c) 2(e) d) 2(n

Description : Offence is defined in………………..of Criminal Code procedure 1973 a) 2(a) b) 2(b) c) 2(e) d) 2(n

Last Answer : d) 2(n)

An investigation into an offence cannot be conducted by (a) Magistrate (b) A person authorized by a magistrate other than a police officer (c) Both a. and b. (d) None of these

Description : An investigation into an offence cannot be conducted by (a) Magistrate (b) A person authorized by a magistrate other than a police officer (c) Both a. and b. (d) None of these

Last Answer : (a) Magistrate

Any allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate, with view to his taking action under this code, that some person, whether known or unknown has committed an offence but not include a police report a) Complainant b) Report c) Complaint d) None of these

Description : Any allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate, with view to his taking  action under this code, that some person, whether known or unknown has committed an  offence but not include a police report  a) Complainant b) Report c) Complaint d) None of these

Last Answer : c) 2(e)

Accordance with first schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, police offer may arrest without warrant a) Bailable offence b) Non cognizable offencec) Cognizable offence d) Criminal offence

Description : Accordance with first schedule or under any other law for the time being in force,  police offer may arrest without warrant a) Bailable offence b) Non cognizable offence c) Cognizable offence d) Criminal offence

Last Answer : c) Cognizable offence