What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest Explanation: Public Interest Litigation, or PIL, is defined as the use of litigation, or legal action, which seeks to advance the cause of minority or disadvantaged groups or individuals, or which raises issues of broad public concern. It is litigation introduced in a court of law, not by the aggrieved party but by the court itself or by any other private party. It is not necessary, for the exercise of the court's jurisdiction, that the person who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court.
by
selected by

Related questions

Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Description : Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Last Answer : (4) against a general topic Explanation: Although the proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or orders made by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of ... India only and perhaps no other Court in the world has been exercising this extraordinary jurisdiction.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Description : The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Last Answer : (4) five Explanation: Minimum five Judges of the Supreme Court are required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference to it.

A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Description : A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Last Answer : (1) an official to perform public duty Explanation: The term "mandamus" literally means "command." Writ of mandamus is issued to a person or lower level Court or a body by a superior Court. ... a particular act. The writ of mandamus is an effective writ that checks the functioning of the government.

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Which one of the following jurisdictions of the Indian judiciary covers Public Interest Litigation? (1) Original Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Epistolary Jurisdiction (4) Advisory Jurisdiction

Description : Which one of the following jurisdictions of the Indian judiciary covers Public Interest Litigation? (1) Original Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Epistolary Jurisdiction (4) Advisory Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (2) Appellate Jurisdiction Explanation: PIL (Public Interest Litigation) writ petition can be filed in Supreme Court under Article 32 only if a question concerning the enforcement of a fundamental ... court whether or not a Fundamental Right is involved. Thus, it comes under appellate jurisdiction.

Public Interest Litigation has its origin in — (1) England (2) France (3) USSR (4) USA

Description : Public Interest Litigation has its origin in — (1) England (2) France (3) USSR (4) USA

Last Answer : (4) USA Explanation: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) means litigation for the protection of the Public Interest. It is litigation introduced in a court of law, not by the aggrieved party but by the court itself or by any other private party. It has its origin in USA.

The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in – (1) The United Kingdom (2) Australia (3) The United States (4) Canada

Description : The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in – (1) The United Kingdom (2) Australia (3) The United States (4) Canada

Last Answer : (3) The United States Explanation: The concept of public Interest litigation (PIL) originated in the USA.

Who was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatuiliah (2) A.M. Ahmedi (3) P.N. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Description : Who was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatuiliah (2) A.M. Ahmedi (3) P.N. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Last Answer : (3) P.N. Bhagwati Explanation: P.N. Bhagwati was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest Litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism. Judicial review is a process under which executive and legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism in India.

Who was the Chief Justice of India when public Interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatullah (2) A.M. Ahmadi (3) PN. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Description : Who was the Chief Justice of India when public Interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatullah (2) A.M. Ahmadi (3) PN. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Last Answer : (3) PN. Bhagwati Explanation: P.N. Bhagwati was the chief justice of India when public interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system. The concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is in ... of AMU (1994-1997). A.S. Anand - 29th Chief Justice of India (1998- 2001).

Which is not a correct statement? The Supreme Court: (1) is a watch-dog of citizen's liberty (2) settles electoral disputes of the President and Vice-President of India (3) interprets the Constitution (4) protects the Directive Principles of State Policy

Description : Which is not a correct statement? The Supreme Court: (1) is a watch-dog of citizen's liberty (2) settles electoral disputes of the President and Vice-President of India (3) interprets the Constitution (4) protects the Directive Principles of State Policy

Last Answer : (4) protects the Directive Principles of State Policy Explanation: The Directive Principles of State Policy are guidelines/ principles given to the central and state governments of India, to be kept in ... , contained in Part IV of the Constitution of India, are not enforceable by any court.

Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Description : Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Last Answer : (1) Fundamental Rights

How many types of writs can be issued by the Supreme Court? (1) Two (2) Three (3) Five (4) Six

Description : How many types of writs can be issued by the Supreme Court? (1) Two (2) Three (3) Five (4) Six

Last Answer : (3) Five Explanation: The Supreme Court, the highest in the country, may issue writs under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and under Articles 139 for ... five kinds of "prerogative" writs: habeas corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.

A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (4) Habeas Corpus Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. This procedure of asking the ... release of a person from illegal detention, thereby protecting their fundamental right of life and liberty.

Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (3) Writ of Mandamus Explanation: A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means "we command" in Latin) is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by ... of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

Writs are issued by – (1) Supreme Court. (2) High Courts (3) The President (4) Supreme Court and High Courts

Description : Writs are issued by – (1) Supreme Court. (2) High Courts (3) The President (4) Supreme Court and High Courts

Last Answer : (4) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Five writs - Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari - are issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts.

How many types of writs can be issued by the Supreme Court? (1) 2 (2) 3 (3) 5 (4) 6

Description : How many types of writs can be issued by the Supreme Court? (1) 2 (2) 3 (3) 5 (4) 6

Last Answer : (3) 5 Explanation: There are 5 types of writs which can be issued by the Supreme Court. They are Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, & Quo Warranto.

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

Which one of the following is issued by the court in case of an illegal detention of a person? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) None of these

Description : Which one of the following is issued by the court in case of an illegal detention of a person? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) None of these

Last Answer : (1) Habeas Corpus Explanation: A writ of habeas corpus is a writ that requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. The principle ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention that is, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Description : To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: Article 71 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that all doubts and disputes relating to election of a President or VicePresident are required to be enquired into and decided by the Supreme Court.

To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Description : To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: According to Article 71 of the Constitution, all doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President ... and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, an election petition can be filed before the Supreme Court.

The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Description : The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Last Answer : (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case Explanation: The basic structure doctrine was first articulated by Justice Hans Raj Khanna in the landmark decision of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (case ... the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the constitution.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Description : Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Last Answer : (2) Supreme Court Explanation: Supreme Court has the power to transfer any Case, appeal or other proceedings from High Court or other court in one State to a High Court or other civil court in any other State.

Who decides the office of profit? (1) President and Governor (2) Union Parliament (3) Supreme Court (4) Union Public Service Commission

Description : Who decides the office of profit? (1) President and Governor (2) Union Parliament (3) Supreme Court (4) Union Public Service Commission

Last Answer : (1) President and Governor Explanation: Under article 102 mentioned the decision of the president shall be final. President and Governor decides the office of profit.

A member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the – (1) President (2) Prime Minister (3) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (4) Chairman of the UPSC

Description : A member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the – (1) President (2) Prime Minister (3) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (4) Chairman of the UPSC

Last Answer : (1) President Explanation: A member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed from office only by an order of the President on the ground of misbehaviour. The President is empowered ... any way participate in its profit or benefits except as an ordinary member of an incorporated company.

The annual report of the UPSC is submitted to – (1) The President (2) The Supreme Court (3) The Prime Minister (4) The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission

Description : The annual report of the UPSC is submitted to – (1) The President (2) The Supreme Court (3) The Prime Minister (4) The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission

Last Answer : (1) The President Explanation: The UPSC annually submits a report of its work to the President of India. Further it is sent to each house of Parliament for discussion.

Members of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the– (1) Parliament after a resolution adopted with 2/3rds majority (2) President on a unani-mous recommendation from the Union Council of Ministers (3) President on the basis of an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court (4) President on recommendation from Central Administrative Tribunal

Description : Members of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the- (1) Parliament after a resolution adopted with 2/3rds majority (2) President on a unani-mous recommendation from ... an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court (4) President on recommendation from Central Administrative Tribunal

Last Answer : (3) President on the basis of an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court Explanation: Every member holds office for a term of six years or until he attains the age of sixty-five years, whichever ... in the opinion of the President unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of mind or body.

The first High/Supreme Court judge, who voluntarily made his assets public is - (1) Justice D.V.S. Kumar (2) Justice K. Chandra (3) Justice K. Kannan (4) Justice V.C. Srivastava

Description : The first High/Supreme Court judge, who voluntarily made his assets public is - (1) Justice D.V.S. Kumar (2) Justice K. Chandra (3) Justice K. Kannan (4) Justice V.C. Srivastava

Last Answer : (3) Justice K. Kannan Explanation: High court judge Justice K Kannan was the first judge to have voluntarily made his assets public.

Which one of the following is not a Directive Principle of State Policy? (1) The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code. (2) The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interest of the weaker sections. (3) The State shall endeavour to promote adult education to eliminate illiteracy. (4) The State shall endeavour to protect every monument, place or object of artistic or historic interest.

Description : Which one of the following is not a Directive Principle of State Policy? (1) The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code. (2) The State shall promote with ... 4) The State shall endeavour to protect every monument, place or object of artistic or historic interest.

Last Answer : (3) The State shall endeavour to promote adult education to eliminate illiteracy.

In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated? -Do You Know?

Description : In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated? -Do You Know?

Description : In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated?

Description : In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originated?

Last Answer : The United States

Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Description : Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Last Answer : (1) Directive Principles of state policy Explanation: The Directive principles of state policy are the directions given to the state these cannot be challenged in the court.

In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Description : In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Last Answer : Golaknath Case

Which of the following statements about the Indian political system is/are correct? (a) The president is both Head of the State and Head of the Government. (b) Parliament is Supreme. (c) The Supreme Court is the guardian of the Constitution. (d) The Directive Principles of State Policy are justiciable. Select the correct answer from the codes given below: (A) (a), (b), (c) and (d) (B) (b), (c) and (d) (C) (b) and (c) (D) (c) only

Description : Which of the following statements about the Indian political system is/are correct? (a) The president is both Head of the State and Head of the Government. (b) Parliament is Supreme. (c) The Supreme Court is the guardian of the ... (d) (B) (b), (c) and (d) (C) (b) and (c) (D) (c) only

Last Answer : Answer: C

Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Description : Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Last Answer : (2) Prohibition Explanation: Prohibition writ is issued by the high court to the lower courts to stop legal action. A writ of prohibition is a writ directing a subordinate to stop doing something the law ... the subordinate, and the clerk prepares the writ and gives it to the Sheriff, who serves it.

A monopolistic trade practice is deemed to be prejudicial to public interest except when A. Authorized by Central Government B. Authorized by State Government C. Authorized by Supreme Court D. None of the above

Description : A monopolistic trade practice is deemed to be prejudicial to public interest except when A. Authorized by Central Government B. Authorized by State Government C. Authorized by Supreme Court D. None of the above

Last Answer : B. Authorized by State Government

The minimum number of judges who are to sit for the purpose of deciding any case involving any substantial question of law for the purpose of hearing any reference under Art 143 shall be - (1) Five (2) Seven (3) Nine (4) Eleven

Description : The minimum number of judges who are to sit for the purpose of deciding any case involving any substantial question of law for the purpose of hearing any reference under Art 143 shall be - (1) Five (2) Seven (3) Nine (4) Eleven

Last Answer : (1) Five Explanation: The minimum number of judges who are to sit for the purpose of hearing any reference under Article 143 shall be five. If at any time it appears to the President that a ... and the Court may, after such hearing as it thinks fit, report to the President its opinion thereon.

Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (C) Writ of Mandamus

Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (C) Writ of Mandamus

_______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan(b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Description : _______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan (b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Last Answer : (b) India

Which one of the following Writs is issued to courts, corporations, government servants or persons directing them to perform their public duty? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Mandamus (4) Prohibition

Description : Which one of the following Writs is issued to courts, corporations, government servants or persons directing them to perform their public duty? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Mandamus (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Mandamus Explanation: Mandamus is a judicial remedy which is in the form of an order from a superior court to any government subordinate court, corporation or public authority to do or forbear from doing ... be, and which is in the nature of public duty and in certain cases of a statutory duty.

One feature is common to the following bodies. Find it out. Supreme Court, Election Commission, UPSC, Office of CAG – (1) They are advisory bodies. (2) They are extra constitutional bodies (3) They are controlled by legislature. (4) They are constitutional bodies.

Description : One feature is common to the following bodies. Find it out. Supreme Court, Election Commission, UPSC, Office of CAG – (1) They are advisory bodies. (2) They are extra constitutional bodies (3) They are controlled by legislature. (4) They are constitutional bodies.

Last Answer : (4) They are constitutional bodies Explanation: They are all constitutional bodies. Constitutional Bodies in India are formed by the Constitution which helps the Government to run properly ... the administration of specific functions. Some additional bodies help them by providing advisory functions.

Pensions of High Court judges are charged on the following - (1) Consolidated fund of India (2) Consolidated fund of State (3) Subject to the decision of Supreme Court (4) None of these

Description : Pensions of High Court judges are charged on the following - (1) Consolidated fund of India (2) Consolidated fund of State (3) Subject to the decision of Supreme Court (4) None of these

Last Answer : (1) Consolidated fund of India Explanation: Pensions of High Court judges are charged on the consolidated Fund of the India.

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Description : Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Last Answer : (3) It can change the judgement Explanation: Supreme Court can only change its position in a case decided earlier by it where it considers for good and substantial reasons to overrule itself on an application if the need arises.