If you oppose this bill then you do not care about public safety. This is an example of . conclusive logic circular reasoning an eitheror argument?

If you oppose this bill then you do not care about public safety. This is an example of . conclusive logic circular reasoning an eitheror argument?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

Need answer
by
selected by

Related questions

The following statement is an example of what kind of logical fallacy? "The university should increase funding of intramural sports because it has a responsibility to back its sports programs financially." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) Circular Reasoning c) Ad Populum (Bandwagon) Argument d) False Analogy e) None of the above

Description : The following statement is an example of what kind of logical fallacy? "The university should increase funding of intramural sports because it has a responsibility to back its sports programs financially." a) ... Reasoning c) Ad Populum (Bandwagon) Argument d) False Analogy e) None of the above

Last Answer : b) Circular Reasoning

What kind of argument is the following: "While it is true that large-screen televisions are expensive, 8 out of 10 families are buying them, so you should consider the purchase more seriously." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "While it is true that large-screen televisions are expensive, 8 out of 10 families are buying them, so you should consider the purchase more seriously." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

Last Answer : d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Last Answer : c) Argument from authority

What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "Dr. McCoy insists that all cats should be given their shots, but anyone who has as many speeding tickets as he does doesn't deserve to be listened to. " a) Argument by example b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack d) Argument from data

Description : What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "Dr. McCoy insists that all cats should be given their shots, but anyone who has as many speeding tickets as he does doesn't deserve to ... by example b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack d) Argument from data

Last Answer : c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack

The following statement is an example of what kind of logical fallacy? "The university should increase funding of intramural sports because it has a responsibility to back its sports programs financially." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) Circular Reasoning c) Ad Populum (Bandwagon) Argument d) False Analogy e) None of the above

Description : The following statement is an example of what kind of logical fallacy? "The university should increase funding of intramural sports because it has a responsibility to back its sports programs financially." a) ... Reasoning c) Ad Populum (Bandwagon) Argument d) False Analogy e) None of the above

Last Answer : b) Circular Reasoning

What kind of argument is the following: "While it is true that large-screen televisions are expensive, 8 out of 10 families are buying them, so you should consider the purchase more seriously." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "While it is true that large-screen televisions are expensive, 8 out of 10 families are buying them, so you should consider the purchase more seriously." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

Last Answer : d) The "bandwagon" fallacy

What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Last Answer : c) Argument from authority

What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "Dr. McCoy insists that all cats should be given their shots, but anyone who has as many speeding tickets as he does doesn't deserve to be listened to. " a) Argument by example b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Description : What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "Dr. McCoy insists that all cats should be given their shots, but anyone who has as many speeding tickets as he does doesn't deserve to be ... reasoning c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Last Answer : c) Ad hominem (to the person) attack

What kind of argument is the following: "Raising the speed limit is like giving **** to an alcoholic." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) False Analogy c) Ad Populum (Join the bandwagon) Argument d) Circular Reasoning e) None of the above

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Raising the speed limit is like giving beer to an alcoholic." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) False Analogy c) Ad Populum (Join the bandwagon) Argument d) Circular Reasoning e) None of the above

Last Answer : b) False Analogy

What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "It is unnecessary for America to support that government because we have no reason for offering it support." a) Flawed syllogism b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Description : What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "It is unnecessary for America to support that government because we have no reason for offering it support." a) Flawed syllogism b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Last Answer : b) Circular reasoning

What kind of fallacy is the following: "I wore this exact same baseball cap when I got an "A" last week and the week before. If I wear my lucky baseball cap, I will get "A"s on all my tests." a) Circular Reasoning b) False Analogy c) Ad Hominem Argument d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship e) None of the above

Description : What kind of fallacy is the following: "I wore this exact same baseball cap when I got an "A" last week and the week before. If I wear my lucky baseball cap, I will get "A"s on all my ... Reasoning b) False Analogy c) Ad Hominem Argument d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship e) None of the above

Last Answer : d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship

What kind of argument is the following: "Raising the speed limit is like giving **** to an alcoholic." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) False Analogy c) Ad Populum (Join the bandwagon) Argument d) Circular Reasoning e) None of the above

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Raising the speed limit is like giving beer to an alcoholic." a) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship b) False Analogy c) Ad Populum (Join the bandwagon) Argument d) Circular Reasoning e) None of the above

Last Answer : b) False Analogy

What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "It is unnecessary for America to support that government because we have no reason for offering it support." a) Flawed syllogism b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Description : What, if any, logical fallacy is illustrated by the following: "It is unnecessary for America to support that government because we have no reason for offering it support." a) Flawed syllogism b) Circular reasoning c) Ad hominem attack d) Argument from data e) None of these

Last Answer : b) Circular reasoning

"I wore this exact same baseball cap when I got an "A" last week and the week before. If I wear my lucky baseball cap, I will get "A"s on all my tests." a) Circular Reasoning b) False Analogy c) Ad Hominem Argument d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship e) None of the above

Description : "I wore this exact same baseball cap when I got an "A" last week and the week before. If I wear my lucky baseball cap, I will get "A"s on all my tests." a) Circular Reasoning b) False Analogy c) Ad Hominem Argument d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship e) None of the above

Last Answer : d) Faulty Cause-Effect Relationship

The premises provide conclusive grounds for the conclusion in ----------- argument. A) Inductive B) Deductive C) Fallacious D) Intuitive

Description : The premises provide conclusive grounds for the conclusion in ----------- argument. A) Inductive B) Deductive C) Fallacious D) Intuitive

Last Answer : B) Deductive

The premises of a valid deductive argument: (A) Provide some evidence for its conclusion (B) Provide no evidence for its conclusion (C) Are irrelevant for its conclusion (D) Provide conclusive evidence for its conclusion

Description : The premises of a valid deductive argument: (A) Provide some evidence for its conclusion (B) Provide no evidence for its conclusion (C) Are irrelevant for its conclusion (D) Provide conclusive evidence for its conclusion

Last Answer : (D) Provide conclusive evidence for its conclusion

Give argument to support or oppose the following assertions: -SST 10th

Description : Give argument to support or oppose the following assertions: -SST 10th

Last Answer : '(a) This statement is incorrect as when we see the example of India and Zimbabwe in 1947. India was included in the Third World Nations, but now, it is one of the fast- ... because democracy always stands for political equality and guarantees right to vote to every adult citizen of the country

Which is an example of the logical fallacy of "either/or" reasoning? a) Most of the people who read the novel said it was terrible, so we should read something else. b) We must renew favored trading status with China or we alienate the country completely and make human rights reform impossible. c) You shouldn’t vote for Bill Jameson because he has only 20% of the vote in the most recent poll. d) None of these

Description : Which is an example of the logical fallacy of "either/or" reasoning? a) Most of the people who read the novel said it was terrible, so we should read something else. b) We must renew favored trading ... Bill Jameson because he has only 20% of the vote in the most recent poll. d) None of these

Last Answer : b) We must renew favored trading status with China or we alienate the country completely and make human rights reform impossible.

Which is an example of the logical fallacy of "either/or" reasoning? a) Most of the people who read the novel said it was terrible, so we should read something else. b) We must renew favored trading status with China or we alienate the country completely and make human rights reform impossible. c) You shouldn’t vote for Bill Jameson because he has only 20% of the vote in the most recent poll. d) None of these

Description : Which is an example of the logical fallacy of "either/or" reasoning? a) Most of the people who read the novel said it was terrible, so we should read something else. b) We must renew favored trading ... Bill Jameson because he has only 20% of the vote in the most recent poll. d) None of these

Last Answer : b) We must renew favored trading status with China or we alienate the country completely and make human rights reform impossible.

When you argue for or against a policy or point of view basing your argument on similar situations, problems or actions you are: a) reasoning from consequences b) reasoning from examples and statistics c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent

Description : When you argue for or against a policy or point of view basing your argument on similar situations, problems or actions you are: a) reasoning from consequences b) reasoning from examples and statistics c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent

Last Answer : c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent

When you argue for or against a policy or point of view basing your argument on similar situations, problems or actions you are: a) reasoning from consequences b) reasoning from examples and statistics c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent d) reasoning from authority and testimony

Description : When you argue for or against a policy or point of view basing your argument on similar situations, problems or actions you are: a) reasoning from consequences b) reasoning from examples and statistics c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent d) reasoning from authority and testimony

Last Answer : c) reasoning from comparisons or precedent

Words and names can become terms only if they are used in---------. A) an argument B) proposition C) thought D) reasoning.

Description : Words and names can become terms only if they are used in---------. A) an argument B) proposition C) thought D) reasoning. 

Last Answer :  B) proposition 

The verbal expression of reasoning is called---------. A) an argument B) a term C) a proposition D) a concept

Description : The verbal expression of reasoning is called---------. A) an argument B) a term C) a proposition D) a concept

Last Answer : A) an argument 

The verbal expression of a judgment is called ----------. A) Argument B) Term C) Proposition D) Reasoning

Description : The verbal expression of a judgment is called ----------. A) Argument B) Term C) Proposition D) Reasoning

Last Answer : C) Proposition 

Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning: (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment (B) The conclusion should be supported by the premise/premises (C) The conclusion must follow from the premise/premises necessarily (D) The argument may be valid or invalid

Description : Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning: (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment ( ... must follow from the premise/premises necessarily (D) The argument may be valid or invalid

Last Answer : (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment

Do you oppose the Monsanto Guarantee Bill?

Description : Do you oppose the Monsanto Guarantee Bill?

Last Answer : It has been tested. There is no evidence that GM foods are going to hurt people. The benefits far outweigh any imagined negatives.

Reasoning/logic question: Premises, conclusion?

Description : Reasoning/logic question: Premises, conclusion?

Last Answer : I would lean towards C. There is not enough information to arrive at a conclusion.

What is the reasoning behind this logic question?

Description : What is the reasoning behind this logic question?

Last Answer : if housing starts are down, merrihew lumber does not necessarily go out of business. the question only states explicitly, that ML will not have to declare bankruptcy if housing projects are up. it does ... is unknown and it can not be determined whether or not they will phase out their masonry line.

Science is derived from Latin word “scientia” which means-----? A. Reasoning B. Logic C. Knowledge (Answer) D. Life

Description : Science is derived from Latin word “scientia” which means-----? A. Reasoning B. Logic C. Knowledge (Answer) D. Life

Last Answer : C. Knowledge (Answer)

The law of evidence consists of (a) Ordinary rules of reasoning (b) Legal rules of evidence (c) Rules of logic (d) All the above.

Description : The law of evidence consists of (a) Ordinary rules of reasoning (b) Legal rules of evidence (c) Rules of logic (d) All the above.

Last Answer : (b) Legal rules of evidence

The law of evidence consists of (a) Ordinary rules of reasoning (b) Legal rules of evidence (c) Rules of logic (d) All the above.

Description : The law of evidence consists of (a) Ordinary rules of reasoning (b) Legal rules of evidence (c) Rules of logic (d) All the above.

Last Answer : (c) Physical as well as psychological facts

Which is mainly used for automated reasoning? a) Backward chaining b) Forward chaining c) Logic programming d) Parallel programming

Description : Which is mainly used for automated reasoning? a) Backward chaining b) Forward chaining c) Logic programming d) Parallel programming

Last Answer : c) Logic programming

What is the study of the methods and principles used to distinguish good reasoning from bad? a. Logic b. Science c. Mathematics d. Literary criticism

Description : What is the study of the methods and principles used to distinguish good reasoning from bad? a. Logic b. Science c. Mathematics d. Literary criticism

Last Answer : a. Logic

________________ is the idea that knowledge comes from experience. a. Rationalism b. Deductive Reasoning c. Logic d. Empiricism

Description : ________________ is the idea that knowledge comes from experience. a. Rationalism b. Deductive Reasoning c. Logic d. Empiricism

Last Answer : d. Empiricism

Aristotle’s theory of syllogism and Descartes and kant’s critic of pure reasoning made knowledge on _____. A. Logic B. Computation logic C. Cognition logic D. All of above

Description : Aristotle’s theory of syllogism and Descartes and kant’s critic of pure reasoning made knowledge on _____. A. Logic B. Computation logic C. Cognition logic D. All of above 

Last Answer : A. Logic 

________ is a unit of reasoning in logic. A) Term B) Copula C) Proposition D) Subject

Description :  ________ is a unit of reasoning in logic. A) Term B) Copula C) Proposition D) Subject

Last Answer : C) Proposition 

What is Conclusive Meaning ?

Description : What is Conclusive Meaning ?

Last Answer : Conclusive means latest.

Why doesnt science offer conclusive proof of phonomena?

Description : Why doesnt science offer conclusive proof of phonomena?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is conclusive evidence that mixing sugar in water is a physical change?

Description : What is conclusive evidence that mixing sugar in water is a physical change?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

When one fact is declared by this Act to be conclusive proof of another, the Court shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : When one fact is declared by this Act to be conclusive proof of another, the Court  shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to  be given for the purpose of disproving it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Conclusive proof

Whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : Whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall  regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these 

Last Answer : c) Shall presume

Whenever it is provided by this Act that the Court may presume a fact, it may either regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, or may call for proof of it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : Whenever it is provided by this Act that the Court may presume a fact, it may either  regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, or may call for proof of it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Last Answer : a) May presume

Which of the following least likely limits the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatement? a. The inherent limitations of any accounting and internal control system. b. Most audit evidences are conclusive rather than being persuasive. c. Audit is based on testing d. Audit procedures that are effective in detecting ordinary misstatements are ineffective in detecting intentional misstatements

Description : Which of the following least likely limits the auditor's ability to detect material misstatement? a. The inherent limitations of any accounting and internal control system. b ... procedures that are effective in detecting ordinary misstatements are ineffective in detecting intentional misstatements

Last Answer : Most audit evidences are conclusive rather than being persuasive

How can the audit program best be described at the beginning of the audit process? a. Conclusive b. Confirmed c. Optional d. Temporary

Description : How can the audit program best be described at the beginning of the audit process? a. Conclusive b. Confirmed c. Optional d. Temporary

Last Answer : Temporary

Which of the following statements is true? a. Professional standards prohibit CPAs from performing non-assurance engagements. b. Absolute assurance is attainable owing to the fact that much of the evidence available to the CPA is persuasive rather than conclusive. c. The CPA’s conclusion provides a level of assurance about the subject matter. d. The responsible party expresses a conclusion that provides a level of assurance as to whether the subject matter conforms, in all material respects, with the identified suitable criteria

Description : Which of the following statements is true? a. Professional standards prohibit CPAs from performing non-assurance engagements. b. Absolute assurance is attainable owing to the fact that much of ... to whether the subject matter conforms, in all material respects, with the identified suitable criteria

Last Answer : The CPA’s conclusion provides a level of assurance about the subject matter.

Reducing assurance engagement risk to zero is very rarely attainable or cost beneficial as a result of the following factors, except a. The use of selective testing. b. The fact that much of the evidence available to the practitioner is persuasive rather than conclusive. c. The practitioner may not have the required assurance knowledge and skills to gather and evaluate evidence. d. The use of judgment in gathering and evaluating evidence and forming conclusions based on that evidence

Description : Reducing assurance engagement risk to zero is very rarely attainable or cost beneficial as a result of the following factors, except a. The use of selective testing. b. The fact that much ... d. The use of judgment in gathering and evaluating evidence and forming conclusions based on that evidence

Last Answer : The practitioner may not have the required assurance knowledge and skills to gather and evaluate evidence.

In the auditing environment, failure to meet the PSAs is often a. An accepted practice. b. A suggestion of negligence. c. Conclusive evidence of negligence. d. Tantamount to criminal behavio

Description : In the auditing environment, failure to meet the PSAs is often a. An accepted practice. b. A suggestion of negligence. c. Conclusive evidence of negligence. d. Tantamount to criminal behavio

Last Answer : Conclusive evidence of negligence

Inherent limitations in an audit stem from the following factors except a. Use of testing. b. Incompetence of the auditor. c. Internal control limitation. d. Most audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive

Description : Inherent limitations in an audit stem from the following factors except a. Use of testing. b. Incompetence of the auditor. c. Internal control limitation. d. Most audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive

Last Answer : Incompetence of the auditor