Who won the court case babine vs gilley's?

Last Answer : England won 12 - 6 (World Rugby have apologized formally toWales as the TMO made an error on the grounding of Gareth Anscombestry - The ball was in fact grounded subject to World Rugby Rules,which would have awarded Wales a minimum 5 point score to be addedto their final score)

did bower vs baker and mckenzie go to supreme court?

Description : did bower vs baker and mckenzie go to supreme court?

Last Answer : Need Answer

Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Description : Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Last Answer : (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty Explanation: Right to life and personal liberty is Article 21 of Fundamental rights. Without this right, for an individual to enjoy other fundamental rights become meaningless.

Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar

Small dogs vs. large dog, make the case?

Description : Small dogs vs. large dog, make the case?

Last Answer : I have a 45 lb dog. with a big bark, and loves a lap. I believe it is best of both worlds. I tend to prefer bigger dogs, but I love cuddling with this bugger. Not the one in my profile. :(

Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Description : Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Last Answer : ANSWER: C

Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Description : Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Last Answer : ANSWER: C

Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Description : Doctrine of necessity was used in the case of ________ for the first time in history. A. Dossai Vs State case B. Asma Jahangir Vs State case C. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Vs State case D. Nusrat Bhutto Vs State case

Last Answer : ANSWER: C

Garner Vs. Murray rule applies in case of– (A) Admission of a partner (B) Dissolution of a firm (C) Retirement of a partner (D) Death of a partner

Description : Garner Vs. Murray rule applies in case of– (A) Admission of a partner (B) Dissolution of a firm (C) Retirement of a partner (D) Death of a partner

Last Answer : Answer: Dissolution of a firm

Which case is related to Fundamental Rights? (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) (2) 'West Bengal vs. Union of India (1963) (3) Sharma vs. Krishna (1959) (4) State of Bombay vs. Balsara

Description : Which case is related to Fundamental Rights? (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) (2) 'West Bengal vs. Union of India (1963) (3) Sharma vs. Krishna (1959) (4) State of Bombay vs. Balsara

Last Answer : (1) Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967) Explanation: In the famous case of Golaknath V. State Of Punjab, -in 1967 the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in ... a "law" under the meaning of Article 13(2) and whether Fundamental Rights can be amended or not.

Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only by leading secondary evidence in case of a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only by leading secondary evidence in ... . State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti

A man may lie but a document will never lie in case of a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : A man may lie but a document will never lie in case of a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal

Role of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to connect accused to the alleged incident. a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Role of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to connect accused to the alleged incident. a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh

Implied admission in written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn. However, the plaintiff can be insisted upon to prove his case a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan. b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Implied admission in written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn. However, the plaintiff can be insisted upon to prove his case a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan. b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan.

The case, State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. KhudiramChakma, is concerned with (a) Minorities (b) SC & ST (c) Refugee (d) Religion

Description : The case, State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. KhudiramChakma, is concerned with (a) Minorities (b) SC & ST (c) Refugee (d) Religion

Last Answer : (c) Refugee

Has something in the law changed since the woman won her case about spilling hot coffee on her lap?

Description : Has something in the law changed since the woman won her case about spilling hot coffee on her lap?

Last Answer : answer:What is it that we are supposed to learn from this story? The story has been used as “proof” that litigation is out of control because someone simply spilled coffee on herself. If she suffered serious injury, it’s a different story.

1. ‘Hydraulic brakes’ and ‘Hydraulic lift’ are devices, why are fluids used in them? 2. Which person won seven gold medals in swimming for the U.S. in the 1972 Olympic? 3. Which Agriculture export item is second in case of India? 4. Which lake in India has the highest water salinity? 5. Who organised Ashwamedha Yajna?

Description : 1. Hydraulic brakes' and Hydraulic lift' are devices, why are fluids used in them? 2. Which person won seven gold medals in swimming for the U.S. in the 1972 Olympic? 3. Which Agriculture export ... is situated in which place? 20. Who was defeated at kannauj in the hands of Sher Shah in 1540?

Last Answer : Answer : 1. For transmitting pressure 2. Mark Spitz 3. Rice 4. Sambhar 5. Samudragupta 6. Electric power generation 7. July, 1947 8. U-235 9. Rajasthan 10. Quran 11. Virender Sehwag 12. ... 16. Either House of Parliament 17. Radon gas 18. Shri V. T. Krishnamachari 19. Chickmaglur 20. Humayun

Who won the court case babine vs gilley's?

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Answer :

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions