rather no, it depends on what (see ALE) In my opinion it is a private law relationship (the auditor is not a public official, they can shoot according to the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court in 2010) and therefore according to Act 89/2012 Coll. Civil Code Sections 84 and 85 generally apply: It is possible to capture a person's form in any way so that, according to the depiction, it is possible to determine his or her identity, it is only possible with his or her permission. It is only possible to expand a person's form with his permission. BUT according to § 88 Permission is not required if a portrait or audio or video recording is made or used to exercise or protect other rights or legally protected interests of other persons. NO AS WOOD pursuant to Section 89 ... may also be acquired or used in a reasonable manner for scientific or artistic purposes and for press, radio, television or similar news without the consent of a person. as can be seen, there will be a fundamental problem with the purpose of use and with dissemination than with the filming itself, §88 can be applied to filming, but dissemination is not possible without the permission of the person, even if it is not possible to determine the identity from the record