The 880K (19-22 thousand) is not the best choice, because AMD FM2 processor sockets (12-18 thousand) have quite a few motherboards to choose from, and they have DDR3 (8GB DDR3 Ram 11-15 thousand) respectively. The GTX 1050Ti (51-65 thousand) has so many "today's" cards that it's worth putting a DDR4-based system under it. If the price is in favor of AMD because there is a smaller frame for machine building, (the combination of the above is 95-120 thousand at the moment), then the newer Ryzen 2400G (40-42 thousand) with AM4 socket may be better because the built-in GPU ( Vega) is a GT1030 on its own, beating price range in terms of price, performance, and video performance, respectively. With a motherboard (15-17 thousand) and memory (8GB 3000Mhz DDR4 Ram 16-19 thousand), if you leave the GTX 1050Ti VGA, the budget you outline will be little more (120-140 thousand), but the difference is huge. The Ryzen 2400G has 4 cores, 8 threads 3.6Ghz (turbo 3.9Ghz) while the 880K has only 4 cores, 4 threads, 4.0Ghz (turbo 4.2Ghz) - despite the latter's higher clock speed, the ryzen has twice as many program threads and Vega's integrated GPU takes the prime. Not to mention that the end result is a DDR4 system, not a DDR3. And if you’re given the Athlon X4 880K, you’ll temporarily take it next to the 1050Ti, but expect bottleneck, so that less CPU power (and slow RAM) won’t take full advantage of your video card’s capabilities. Games Low-Normal, FullHD warmed up, there will be no obstacles around 50-60FPS with 880K either.