Awlaki and the CIA Hit List -- Should US Presidents have the right to target US Citizens for assassination without any judicial review?

1 Answer

Answer :

No.

Related questions

Description : What do you think of Romney choosing Robert Bork to select his judicial nominees?

Last Answer : I hope this gets people who are disappointed in Obama interested in fighting for his re-election.

Description : Is the U.S. more... or less "safe" from NSA spying on their own citizens?

Last Answer : Sure. Unless you are a reporter who would report negatively on the government, or you have an ex who works for the Feds. Only 4 million people have top secret access. What are the odds you have upset someone in that set?

Description : Would it be better if the US president served only one term?

Last Answer : I’d say yes, it would force the president to actually get things done rather than focus on getting reelected and then coasting on with a who gives a damn attitude.

Description : Would you support an Amendment prohibiting the US Gov. from deficit spending even if it would likely lead to a future Great Depression?

Last Answer : Oh, if it were only that easy…

Description : Does the right to bear arms include swords?

Last Answer : Words mean things. Sometimes, definitions change. Arms at the time when the constitution was written implied those arms which one personally carried (e.g., musket, pistol, swords, dagger). Ordnance ... of today. Its illegal to the constitution to collect federal tax, but they do that anyways.

Description : President Trump suggested that all people who cross the border illegally (“invade” was the term he used) should be deported summarily, without a court hearing. Not Constitutional Law but is it another step in Trump running the country his way?

Last Answer : I mean, the guy did say that he would like people to treat him like the North Koreans treat Kim. He wants to be a dictator.

Description : Should the USA Amend the Constitution to allow the President limited powers of war without a Congressional Declaration of War?

Last Answer : I think the President is the commander in chief and has the right to onvoke the use of military force without authorization from Congress.

Description : Okay what is your take on Jared Kushner (Trump's Son-in-law) being named Senior Advisor to the President and Federal anti-nepotism rules?

Last Answer : All hail our Highness, the kind Donald I of Trump dynasty.

Description : Should the Electoral College be done away with?

Last Answer : answer:The Electoral College was created with the sole purpose of getting the slave states to agree to ratify the new Constitution and join the union. The non-slave states gave them extra votes ... and the President through the EC. It is an egregious institution and needs to be abolished.

Description : Will the Electoral College serve the purpose the Founding Fathers created it for?

Last Answer : answer:Since the electors are party hacks, the chances are slim. Some states prohibit their electors from backing anyone but the person the state selected but the penalties are not very prohibitive. I ... kill any future they may have within the party structure and, hey, party before country right?

Description : What's your take on the Trump supporters's initiative to repeal the 19th Amendment to the Constitution so women couldn't vote? If women couldn't vote, Trump would win big.

Last Answer : Will Hillary win if only women are allowed to vote?

Description : Should an educated American know what all of the amendments to the Constitution are, by heart?

Last Answer : I certainly couldn’t pull all of them up, but an educated American should at least have been exposed to them to the extent that they are recognized when referenced. eg. Obama’s 3rd term.

Description : Can the president re-name anything just by the stroke of a pen?

Last Answer : answer:Read the whole article that you didn't link to. The quick answer is no he can't, but in this case, the Bureau of Geographic Names had sat on this request for 40 years, and the president has ... action by the agency. So yes, in this case, the president has the power, but not in all cases.

Description : Is the President breaking the law?

Last Answer : I don't think he is breaking the law. I think he has a tendency to overlook other important details that greatly influence his decisions and law-making plans, and focus mainly on the main idea. (I think the ... he doesn't seem to see that.) He is, and continues to be, a work-in-progress president.

Description : How would you role play a Dungeons and Dragons chaotic good bard/character with straight 18's for ability scores?

Last Answer : Singing so badly that any monster dies from internal haemorrhaging. Then finish them off with my lute. (My only contacts with D&D are the movie, Neverwinter Nights 2 and the current Neverwinter MMO)

Description : Do you think that any of the 17 amendments of the Constitution, subsequent to the first 10 (which became the Bill of Rights,) should also come under the auspices of "The Bill of Rights?"?

Last Answer : answer:Many of the Founders would object to many of the 17 amendments. Allowing blacks and women to vote? Are you crazy? This is why it is good people die. Civilization needs to weed out that kind of thinking.

Description : There are 27 amendments to the Constitution. Why do only the first 10 come under the umbrella of "The Bill of Rights?"?

Last Answer : answer:Many of the original Founders were concerned (rightly so, apparently!) that a strong centralized government would be automatically too-strong from the get-go and would only get stronger. For ... the Bill of Rights as a precondition for their support of the Constitution as it was written.

Description : Is the U.S. Constitution really clearcut?

Last Answer : The constitution was written about 236 years ago. Maybe when it was written it was clearcut. But times have changed and shit needs to be updated from time to time, just like the second amendment. Guns need ... all of which would have a lesser of chance of happening if guns weren't legal in the US.

Description : What is the constitutional basis for the Civil Rights Act?

Last Answer : answer:I think its basis is this section of the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator ... , Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Description : Is there a defense fund for protesters wrongly arrested while exercising their constitutional rights?

Last Answer : I have no idea, but that is the greatest darn idea, ever. We can start with the woman that was pulled by her hair across the street, and the woman that was punched in the face.

Description : Casey Anthony acquittal, to whom does it seem to be the O.J. trial feminine style?

Last Answer : Spoiler Alert: She was proven non-guilty on all cases in which she was trialed for.

Description : Is there a difference between racism and racial discrimination?

Last Answer : Racial discrimination implies some sort of act. Racism is a belief.

Description : Is the Supreme Court broken?

Last Answer : Welcome to America.

Description : We're Not Legally Obligated to Pay State/Federal Income Tax? It is a voluntary tax?

Last Answer : I can direct you to a law on a dot-gov website that states pretty darn clearly what happens to you if you don’t pay federal income taxes. You go to jail. So if by “voluntary” you mean, your choice is your money or your freedom, the suuuure, it’s voluntary.

Description : Which one of the American presidents remained the head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) before becoming the president? (a) Richard Nixon (b) Jimmy Carter (c) George Herbert Walker Bush (d) Gerald Rudolph Ford

Last Answer : (c) George Herbert Walker Bush

Description : Which one of the following is not the tool of good governance? (1) Right to information (2) Citizens' Charter (3) Social Auditing (4) Judicial Activism

Last Answer : (4) Judicial Activism Explanation: Judicial activism refers to judicial rulings that are suspected of being based on personal opinion, rather than on existing law. The question of judicial activism is closely related to constitutional interpretation, statutory construction, and separation of powers.

Description : Which one of the following is not the tool of good governance? (A) Right to information (B) Citizens' Charter (C) Social Auditing (D) Judicial Activism

Last Answer : Answer: D Judicial activism refers to judicial rulings suspected of being based on pe rsonal or political considerations rather than on existing law. The definition of judicial activism, and ... social audit helps to narrow gaps between vision/goal and reality, between efficiency and effectiveness 

Description : Which case of the US set up the principle of Judicial Review?

Last Answer : Marbury v. Madison.

Description : Is the ACLU really going to make hay over the Al-Awlaki kill in Yemen?

Last Answer : answer:You mean this? Heck, I actually agree with Ron Paul on something!

Description : A pilot has to release the bomb to hit a target – (1) right above the target (2) beyond the target (3) before the target (4) None of these

Last Answer : (3) before the target Explanation: According to Newton's first law, an object that is at rest will stay at rest unless an unbalanced force acts upon it and an object that is in motion will not change its velocity unless an unbalanced force acts upon it.

Description : A pilot has to release the bomb to hit a target (1) right above the target (2) beyond the target (3) before the target (4) None of these

Last Answer : before the target

Description : What do you understand by the term ‘Judicial Review’? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Judicial Review means that the Supreme Court can reject the laws passed by the Legislature and the orders issued by the Executive and declare them void, if they are not in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

Description : What is meant by Judicial Review and Original Jurisdiction? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Judicial Review refers to the power of the Supreme Court to declare null and void those laws of the legislature and those orders of the executive which go against the provisions of ... Also, in cases involving the violation of Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction.

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

Description : What does the power of judicial review ensure? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Description : Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Description : What is judicial review why is it important?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Description : What did the courts get the power of judicial review?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Description : What was an argument President Jefferson against the idea of judicial review?

Last Answer : it gave too much power to officials with lifetime terms~APEX

Description : How Does judicial review really strengthen the constitutional principle of checks and balances or not justify your answer?

Last Answer : Need answer

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Last Answer : (1) Indian Parliament is supreme Explanation: Though the Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India, the legislation passed by parliament may be challenged in Supreme Court. The ... houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

Description : If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Last Answer : (1) Valid Explanation: If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain valid.

Description : How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: The legislative excess of parliament and state assemblies checked by judicial review of Supreme Court.

Description : Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by law Explanation: Judicial Review is based on procedure established by law.

Description : The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are - (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty ... 4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Last Answer : (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government. Explanation: The power of Parliament to legislate and amend provisions of the ... review; Independence of Judiciary; Harmony between Fundamental rights and Directive principles; etc.

Description : The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Last Answer : (4) The system of judicial review Explanation: The law that the British Parliament enacts, cannot be brought to the Judiciary for its review unlike the Indian Parliament, wherein the legislation that ... in case the courts declare it to be violating the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.

Description : What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Last Answer : (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws Explanation: The Supreme Court has been given the power to decide whether a law passed by the Parliament or the State legislatures and the executive ... such a law or executive decision is found unconstitutional, then it can declare it as invalid.

Description : The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Last Answer : (2) Article 32 and Article 226 Explanation: Legislature, executive and judiciary under the Constitution are to exercise powers with checks and balances, but not in water-tight rigid mould. In India, on the basis of Articles 32 and 136, the Supreme Court can exercise the power of judicial review.