What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws Explanation: The Supreme Court has been given the power to decide whether a law passed by the Parliament or the State legislatures and the executive decisions taken by the Central or State government is constitutional or not. If such a law or executive decision is found unconstitutional, then it can declare it as invalid.
by
selected by

Related questions

Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order? (1) (1) Article 137 (2) (2) Article 138 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 140

Description : Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order? (1) (1) Article 137 (2) (2) Article 138 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 140

Last Answer : (1) Article 137 Explanation: Article 137 of the constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order. Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and ... Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order madc) by it.

What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Description : What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (4) Judicial Review Explanation: Because the Supreme Court is given the power to protect, safeguard and uphold the Constitution and empowered to declare a law null and void if it is found to be inconsistent with the Constitution.

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Last Answer : (1) Indian Parliament is supreme Explanation: Though the Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India, the legislation passed by parliament may be challenged in Supreme Court. The ... houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Description : If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Last Answer : (1) Valid Explanation: If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain valid.

Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India. (2) There is one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency. (3) The Parliament has the power to make laws relating to the delimitation of constituencies. (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Description : Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India ... has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies. Explanation: Under Article 82 of the constitution, ... the delimitation commission demarcates the boundary of parliamentary constituency on the basis of Delimitation Act.

Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order? (1) Article 137 (2) Article 130 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 138

Description : Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order? (1) Article 137 (2) Article 130 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 138

Last Answer : (1) Article 137 Explanation: Article 137 of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order. Article 130 deals, with seat of supreme court. Article 138 ... court mentioned. Article 139 refers conferment on the supreme court of powers to issue certain writs.

Which of the following is a feature to both the Indian Federation and the American Federation? (1) A single citizenship (2) Dual judiciary (3) Three Lists in the Constitution (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution

Description : Which of the following is a feature to both the Indian Federation and the American Federation? (1) A single citizenship (2) Dual judiciary (3) Three Lists in the Constitution (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution

Last Answer : (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution Explanation: According to the Constitution of India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the ... and advisory jurisdiction. It functioned until 1950, when the Supreme Court. of India was established.

During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Description : During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Fundamental Rights Explanation: National emergency under article 352 of the Indian Constitution is caused by war, external aggression or armed rebellion in the whole of India or a part of ... according to the original Constitution, It modifies the federal system of government to a unitary one.

Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Description : Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Last Answer : (3) It can change the judgement Explanation: Supreme Court can only change its position in a case decided earlier by it where it considers for good and substantial reasons to overrule itself on an application if the need arises.

The Indian Judiciary is headed by : (1) The president (2) The prime minister (3) The supreme court (4) The parliament

Description : The Indian Judiciary is headed by : (1) The president (2) The prime minister (3) The supreme court (4) The parliament

Last Answer : (3) The supreme court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal. According to the Constitution, the role of the Supreme Court is guardian of Constitution & that of a federal court.

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten years as an Advocate of a High Court (3) In the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Description : Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten ... the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Last Answer : (4) At least twenty years as a SubJudicial Magistrate Explanation: Eligibility of a judge of the Supreme Court a judge of one high court or more (continuously), for at least five years, or. an ... opinion of the president, power conferred by clause (2) of article 124 of the Constitution of India.

Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Description : Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by law Explanation: Judicial Review is based on procedure established by law.

The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are – (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty, territorial integrity and parliamentary system of government. (3) Judicial review and the federal system. (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Description : The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are - (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty ... 4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Last Answer : (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government. Explanation: The power of Parliament to legislate and amend provisions of the ... review; Independence of Judiciary; Harmony between Fundamental rights and Directive principles; etc.

The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Description : The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Last Answer : (2) Article 32 and Article 226 Explanation: Legislature, executive and judiciary under the Constitution are to exercise powers with checks and balances, but not in water-tight rigid mould. In India, on the basis of Articles 32 and 136, the Supreme Court can exercise the power of judicial review.

Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Description : Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by Law Explanation: Judicial review is adopted in the Constitution of India from the Constitution of the United States of America. In the Indian constitution, judicial review ... the court to exercise the power. Normally, it works according to procedure established by law.

The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Description : The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Last Answer : (4) Minor contradictions in society Explanation: The presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a President who serves as both head of state and head of government. It operates most successfully in the USA because of Minor Contradictions in society.

Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Description : Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Sovereignty of Parliament Explanation: Sovereignty of Parliament is not a feature of Indian constitution. Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to interpret the constitution and law or order of the legislature and executive void.

Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Description : Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

What is the meaning of “Judicial Review” of Supreme Court

Description : What is the meaning of “Judicial Review” of Supreme Court

Last Answer : Review of constitutional validity of laws

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President. 

Last Answer : (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review.

What is the basis of classification of governments as unitary and federal? (1) Relationship between legislature and executive (2) Relationship between executive and judiciary (3) Relationship between the Centre and States (4) Relationship between the legislature, executive and judicial wings of government

Description : What is the basis of classification of governments as unitary and federal? (1) Relationship between legislature and executive (2) Relationship between executive and judiciary (3) Relationship ... Centre and States (4) Relationship between the legislature, executive and judicial wings of government

Last Answer : (3) Relationship between the Centre and States Explanation: The basic principles of federalism are the distribution of powers between the Centre and the States.

The growth of judicial power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies have taken place because - (1) The constitutions have given the judiciary more powers (2) Acceptance of the theory of separation of powers (3) The U. N. Directives (4) Protect Human Rights

Description : The growth of judicial power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies have taken place because - (1) The constitutions have given the judiciary more powers (2) Acceptance of the theory of separation of powers (3) The U. N. Directives (4) Protect Human Rights

Last Answer : (4) Protect Human Rights Explanation: The growth of Judicial Power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies has taken place to protect Human rights.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its - (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its - (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (4) Original Jurisdiction Explanation: The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be categorised as original, appellate and advisory. Under the Original Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court can settle disputes (1) between the ... one or more other States on the other; or (3) between two or more States.

The minimum number of judges to sit on the Constitutional Bench or on Bench which gives its advisory opinion on the reference by the President must be: (1) One half of the total strength of the Supreme Court (2) Seven (3) Three (4) One-third of the total strength of the court

Description : The minimum number of judges to sit on the Constitutional Bench or on Bench which gives its advisory opinion on the reference by the President must be: (1) One half of the total strength of the Supreme Court (2) Seven (3) Three (4) One-third of the total strength of the court

Last Answer : (1) One half of the total strength of the Supreme Court Explanation: Court's advisory jurisdiction may be sought by the President under Article 143 of the Constitution. This procedure is termed as " ... on the reference by the President must be one half of the total strength of the Supreme Court.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its : (1) Advisory jurisdiction (2) Appellate jurisdiction (3) Original jurisdiction (4) Constitutional jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its : (1) Advisory jurisdiction (2) Appellate jurisdiction (3) Original jurisdiction (4) Constitutional jurisdiction

Last Answer : (3) Original jurisdiction Explanation: Under Article 131, disputes between different units of the Federation will be within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Subject to the provisions of this ... one or more other States on the other; or (3) between two or more States.

The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the State falls under its ________. (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Description : The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the State falls under its ________. (1) Advisory Jurisdiction (2) Appellate Jurisdiction (3) Constitutional Jurisdiction (4) Original Jurisdiction

Last Answer : (4) Original Jurisdiction Explanation: The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the centre and the states falls under its original jurisdiction. The original jurisdiction of a court is ... or judge to pronounce the sentence of law, provided by law upon a state of facts.

One feature is common to the following bodies. Find it out. Supreme Court, Election Commission, UPSC, Office of CAG – (1) They are advisory bodies. (2) They are extra constitutional bodies (3) They are controlled by legislature. (4) They are constitutional bodies.

Description : One feature is common to the following bodies. Find it out. Supreme Court, Election Commission, UPSC, Office of CAG – (1) They are advisory bodies. (2) They are extra constitutional bodies (3) They are controlled by legislature. (4) They are constitutional bodies.

Last Answer : (4) They are constitutional bodies Explanation: They are all constitutional bodies. Constitutional Bodies in India are formed by the Constitution which helps the Government to run properly ... the administration of specific functions. Some additional bodies help them by providing advisory functions.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

Under which of the constitutional provision, the Supreme Court of India extends advice to the president of India? (1) Article 141 (2) Article 142 (3) Article 143 (4) Article 144

Description : Under which of the constitutional provision, the Supreme Court of India extends advice to the president of India? (1) Article 141 (2) Article 142 (3) Article 143 (4) Article 144

Last Answer : (3) Article 143 Explanation: Under article 143 of the constitutional provision, the Supreme Court of India extends advice to the President of India. The article is about Power of President to consult ... civil and judicial authorities to act in the territory of India in aid of the Supreme Court.

Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

Implementing laws is the function of – (1) Executive (2) Legislature (3) Judiciary (4) Cabinet

Description : Implementing laws is the function of – (1) Executive (2) Legislature (3) Judiciary (4) Cabinet

Last Answer : (1) Executive Explanation: The executive branch is responsible for implementing the laws that are created by the legislative branch (the Rajya Sabha and House of Representatives). The Executive Branch ... . Its main purpose is to execute, enforce and administer the laws that legislature passes.

What is the objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission? (1) Training of the judges (2) Reforms in legal system (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. (4) To examine the working period of the judges.

Description : What is the objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission? (1) Training of the judges (2) Reforms in legal system (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. (4) To examine the working period of the judges.

Last Answer : (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. Explanation: The main objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission is bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level.

Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation and business (2) Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Description : Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation ... any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Last Answer : (4) Freedom of the press Explanation: The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution.

What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Description : What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Last Answer : (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government Explanation: An ordinary law is a normal law, generally distinguished from a constitutional law. It is made and enforced by the competent authorities of ... to the State and to one another. An ordinary law requires only simple majority in Parliament.

Sarkaria Commission was set up to review - (1) the relation between the President and the Prime Minister (2) the relation between the legislative and the executive (3) the relations between the executive and the judiciary (4) the relations between the Union and the State.

Description : Sarkaria Commission was set up to review - (1) the relation between the President and the Prime Minister (2) the relation between the legislative and the executive (3) the relations between the executive and the judiciary (4) the relations between the Union and the State.

Last Answer : (4) the relations between the Union and the State. Explanation: Sarkaria Commission was set up to review the relations between the Union and the States. Sarkaria Commission was set up in June 1983 by the central government of India.

What is the main difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of state policy? (1) Constitutional Protection (2) Political Protection (3) Judicial Protection (4) Moral Protection

Description : What is the main difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of state policy? (1) Constitutional Protection (2) Political Protection (3) Judicial Protection (4) Moral Protection

Last Answer : (3) Judicial Protection Explanation: Fundamental rights are enforceable rights which means on violation of these rights you can move to court of law but directive principles are not enforceable which means on violation of these you can't move to court law.

Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive is enjoined by (A) VII Schedule to the Constitution (B) Judicial decision (C) Directive Principles (D) Preamble

Description : Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive is enjoined by (A) VII Schedule to the Constitution (B) Judicial decision (C) Directive Principles (D) Preamble

Last Answer : (C) Directive Principles

Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive is enjoined by (A) VII Schedule to the Constitution (B) Judicial decision (C) Directive Principles (D) Preamble

Description : Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive is enjoined by (A) VII Schedule to the Constitution (B) Judicial decision (C) Directive Principles (D) Preamble

Last Answer : (C) Directive Principles

How Does judicial review really strengthen the constitutional principle of checks and balances or not justify your answer?

Description : How Does judicial review really strengthen the constitutional principle of checks and balances or not justify your answer?

Last Answer : Need answer

How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: The legislative excess of parliament and state assemblies checked by judicial review of Supreme Court.

The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Description : The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Last Answer : (4) The system of judicial review Explanation: The law that the British Parliament enacts, cannot be brought to the Judiciary for its review unlike the Indian Parliament, wherein the legislation that ... in case the courts declare it to be violating the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.

We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Description : We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Last Answer : (4) Both in India and U. S. A. Explanation: We have the system of Judicial Review in both states of India and U. S. A.

How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. Specific courts with ... a modern governmental system (where the judiciary is one of three branches of government).

Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Description : Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Last Answer : (2) Judicial Review Explanation: Sovereignty of Indian parliament is restricted by judicial review. The concept also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so that it is not bound by written law (in some cases, even a constitution) or by precedent.

The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.

Description : The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.

Last Answer : (4) U.S.A. Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. It is an example ... to the adjudication of constitutionality of statutes, especially by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism. Judicial review is a process under which executive and legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.