Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.
by
selected by

Related questions

Which is the highest judicial authority in India whose decisions are binding on all courts? (a) Supreme Court (b) Parliament (c) Law Minister (d) Lok Sabha

Description : Which is the highest judicial authority in India whose decisions are binding on all courts? (a) Supreme Court (b) Parliament (c) Law Minister (d) Lok Sabha

Last Answer : (a) Supreme Court

The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) has been declared unconstitutional by (A) The Supreme Court of India (B) The High Court (C) The High Court and the Supreme Court both (D) The President of India

Description : The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) has been declared unconstitutional by (A) The Supreme Court of India (B) The High Court (C) The High Court and the Supreme Court both (D) The President of India

Last Answer : (A) The Supreme Court of India

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Last Answer : (1) Indian Parliament is supreme Explanation: Though the Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India, the legislation passed by parliament may be challenged in Supreme Court. The ... houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Description : If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Last Answer : (1) Valid Explanation: If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain valid.

What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Description : What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Last Answer : (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws Explanation: The Supreme Court has been given the power to decide whether a law passed by the Parliament or the State legislatures and the executive ... such a law or executive decision is found unconstitutional, then it can declare it as invalid.

what power allows the supreme court to declare laws unconstitutional.?

Description : what power allows the supreme court to declare laws unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : The power of judicial review allows the US Supreme Court to declare laws, policies, executive orders and US treaties that are relevant to cases before the Court unconstitutional and nullify them if they violate the principles of the US Constitution.

Which Institution has the final authority to interpret the Constitution of India? (1) Parliament (2) Supreme Court of India (3) President (4) Attorney General of India

Description : Which Institution has the final authority to interpret the Constitution of India? (1) Parliament (2) Supreme Court of India (3) President (4) Attorney General of India

Last Answer : (2) Supreme Court of India Explanation: The Supreme Court is the highest court in India and has ultimate judicial authority to interpret the Constitution and decide questions of national ... the final authority whether amendment violates or infringes upon the basic structure of the constitution.

Who is the final authority to interpret the Constitution? (1) The President (2) The Parliament (3) The Lok Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Description : Who is the final authority to interpret the Constitution? (1) The President (2) The Parliament (3) The Lok Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is regarded as the guardian of the Constitution. It is the Supreme or final interpreter of the Constitution. The interpretation of the Constitution given by the Supreme Court is to be respected.

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten years as an Advocate of a High Court (3) In the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Description : Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten ... the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Last Answer : (4) At least twenty years as a SubJudicial Magistrate Explanation: Eligibility of a judge of the Supreme Court a judge of one high court or more (continuously), for at least five years, or. an ... opinion of the president, power conferred by clause (2) of article 124 of the Constitution of India.

Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India. (2) There is one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency. (3) The Parliament has the power to make laws relating to the delimitation of constituencies. (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Description : Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India ... has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies. Explanation: Under Article 82 of the constitution, ... the delimitation commission demarcates the boundary of parliamentary constituency on the basis of Delimitation Act.

Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Description : Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Which Article mentioned that the Supreme Court of india is the highest Judicial authority of the Nation a) Art-121 b) Art-122 c) Art-123 d) Art-124

Description : Which Article mentioned that the Supreme Court of india is the highest Judicial authority of the Nation a) Art-121 b) Art-122 c) Art-123 d) Art-124

Last Answer : d) Art-124

What is the meaning of “Judicial Review” of Supreme Court

Description : What is the meaning of “Judicial Review” of Supreme Court

Last Answer : Review of constitutional validity of laws

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President. 

Last Answer : (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review.

Which of the following writs/orders of the High Court/Supreme Court is sought to get an order of an authority quashed? (1) Mandamus (2) Certiorari (3) Quo Warranto (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : Which of the following writs/orders of the High Court/Supreme Court is sought to get an order of an authority quashed? (1) Mandamus (2) Certiorari (3) Quo Warranto (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (2) Certiorari Explanation: Literally, Certiorari means to be certified. The writ of certiorari can be issued by the Supreme Court or any High Court for quashing the order already passed by ... decision complained of or whether the tribunal exceeded its powers in issuing the decision complained of.

Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (3) Writ of Mandamus Explanation: A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means "we command" in Latin) is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by ... of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

In a democracy, the will of the people is supreme. Which of the following statement concerning democracy in India best reflects this? (1) The President appoints the Prime Minister who is the leader of the political party possessing a majority in the Lok Sabha. (2) An assembly of elected representatives exercises political authority on behalf of the people. (3) In case of a difference between the two Houses of Parliament, the final decision is taken in a joint session of the two Houses. (4) The permanent executive has more powers than the political executive.

Description : In a democracy, the will of the people is supreme. Which of the following statement concerning democracy in India best reflects this? (1) The President appoints the Prime Minister who is the ... session of the two Houses. (4) The permanent executive has more powers than the political executive.

Last Answer : (2) An assembly of elected representatives exercises political authority on behalf of the people. Explanation: In all democracies an assembly of elected representatives exercises political authority on ... consists of elected representative of the people, it exercises authority over the government.

Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Description : Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by law Explanation: Judicial Review is based on procedure established by law.

Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Description : Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by Law Explanation: Judicial review is adopted in the Constitution of India from the Constitution of the United States of America. In the Indian constitution, judicial review ... the court to exercise the power. Normally, it works according to procedure established by law.

In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Description : In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Last Answer : (3) Both (1) and (b) Explanation: The Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award in the case of interstate river water disputes and delimitation of constitution.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Description : The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Last Answer : (2) Inter-State disputes Explanation: The Supreme Court. has exclusive original jurisdiction over any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any ... of a legal right depend. In this capacity, it serves as the federal court of India.

The source of authority of the Indian Constitution is: (1) The Supreme Court (2) The Government (3) The People of India (4) The President

Description : The source of authority of the Indian Constitution is: (1) The Supreme Court (2) The Government (3) The People of India (4) The President

Last Answer : (3) The People of India Explanation: The preamble of the Indian Constitution mentions that the Constitution derives its authority from the people of India. The words in the preamble-"We, the ... the ultimate sovereignty of the people of India and that the constitution rests on their authority.

Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order? (1) (1) Article 137 (2) (2) Article 138 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 140

Description : Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order? (1) (1) Article 137 (2) (2) Article 138 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 140

Last Answer : (1) Article 137 Explanation: Article 137 of the constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order. Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and ... Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order madc) by it.

Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order? (1) Article 137 (2) Article 130 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 138

Description : Which article of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgment or order? (1) Article 137 (2) Article 130 (3) Article 139 (4) Article 138

Last Answer : (1) Article 137 Explanation: Article 137 of the Constitution permits the Supreme Court to review its own judgement or order. Article 130 deals, with seat of supreme court. Article 138 ... court mentioned. Article 139 refers conferment on the supreme court of powers to issue certain writs.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

The final authority to interpret our Constitution is the – (1) President (2) Parliament (3) Prime Minister (4) Superme Court

Description : The final authority to interpret our Constitution is the – (1) President (2) Parliament (3) Prime Minister (4) Superme Court

Last Answer : (4) Superme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal as established by Part V, Chapter IV of the Constitution of India. ... on the interpretation of the Constitution of India and all statutes and regulations created pursuant to it.

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: The legislative excess of parliament and state assemblies checked by judicial review of Supreme Court.

During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Description : During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Fundamental Rights Explanation: National emergency under article 352 of the Indian Constitution is caused by war, external aggression or armed rebellion in the whole of India or a part of ... according to the original Constitution, It modifies the federal system of government to a unitary one.

Why were some schools still segregated in 1960 even though the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation was unconstitutional in 1954?

Description : Why were some schools still segregated in 1960 even though the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation was unconstitutional in 1954?

Last Answer : Reginald F. Lewis (December 7, 1942 - January 19, 1993), was an American businessman. He was one of the richest African-American men in the 1980s, and the first African American to build a ... In 1993, Forbes listed Lewis among the 400 richest Americans, with a net worth estimated at $400 million.

Why did the treatment of the Cherokee get worse after the Supreme Court declares Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?

Description : Why did the treatment of the Cherokee get worse after the Supreme Court declares Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?

Last Answer : The federal government did not enforce the court's decision>:((

Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Description : Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Last Answer : (1) Right to privacy Explanation: Judicial activism has brought the Right to Privacy within the realm of Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court of India has construed "right to privacy" as a part of ... conceive to be their duty must strictly and scrupulously observe the forms and rules of the law".

The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are – (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty, territorial integrity and parliamentary system of government. (3) Judicial review and the federal system. (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Description : The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are - (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty ... 4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Last Answer : (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government. Explanation: The power of Parliament to legislate and amend provisions of the ... review; Independence of Judiciary; Harmony between Fundamental rights and Directive principles; etc.

The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Description : The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Last Answer : (4) The system of judicial review Explanation: The law that the British Parliament enacts, cannot be brought to the Judiciary for its review unlike the Indian Parliament, wherein the legislation that ... in case the courts declare it to be violating the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.

The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Description : The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Last Answer : (2) Article 32 and Article 226 Explanation: Legislature, executive and judiciary under the Constitution are to exercise powers with checks and balances, but not in water-tight rigid mould. In India, on the basis of Articles 32 and 136, the Supreme Court can exercise the power of judicial review.

We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Description : We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Last Answer : (4) Both in India and U. S. A. Explanation: We have the system of Judicial Review in both states of India and U. S. A.

The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Description : The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Last Answer : (4) Minor contradictions in society Explanation: The presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a President who serves as both head of state and head of government. It operates most successfully in the USA because of Minor Contradictions in society.

How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. Specific courts with ... a modern governmental system (where the judiciary is one of three branches of government).

Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Description : Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Last Answer : (2) Judicial Review Explanation: Sovereignty of Indian parliament is restricted by judicial review. The concept also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so that it is not bound by written law (in some cases, even a constitution) or by precedent.

Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Description : Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Sovereignty of Parliament Explanation: Sovereignty of Parliament is not a feature of Indian constitution. Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to interpret the constitution and law or order of the legislature and executive void.

The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.

Description : The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.

Last Answer : (4) U.S.A. Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. It is an example ... to the adjudication of constitutionality of statutes, especially by the Supreme Court of the United States.

What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Description : What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (4) Judicial Review Explanation: Because the Supreme Court is given the power to protect, safeguard and uphold the Constitution and empowered to declare a law null and void if it is found to be inconsistent with the Constitution.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism. Judicial review is a process under which executive and legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism in India.