answer:1. Governments are corrupt, bought and controlled by corporations. It is only a matter of time before restrictions on where children can be forced work are undermined and eventually eliminated. The emergence of sweatshop conditions is only a matter of time. 2. Children are impressionable. Employers would find it easy to intimidate children into doing all kinds of work outside of regulations and restrictions, and get them to shut their mouths about it. Think of child molesting priests telling their victims not to tell anyone. It works. Plus, children do not know their rights and would not know when they would have the right to say no, as well as being too scared to say no. 3. It would interfere with education. At first, just with them being able to do homework, deteriorating their grades. Later, as restrictions are lifted due to corporate lobbying, school attendance itself will be compromised. 4. Their health would be compromised. Child labour causes developmental defects and chronic illness in adulthood, especially when the work is backbreaking. 5. Employers would use it as an excuse to further depress wages. “oh, your kid is working? then you do not need to be paid as much, ha!” 6. It would likely fail to increase parent’s involvement with their children. There is no guarantee that they would work at the same place, at the same time. Hell, there is not even a guarantee that they would work at the same company. In fact, it would likely further drive children and parents apart. So my prediction is that the end result would be further fractured families, less educated children, children with chronic illnesses, and a widened gap between the rich and the poor. All in all, I consider it to be a dreadful idea.