After considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist that fact is said to be a) Not proved b) Disapproved c) Proved d) None of these

After considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist that fact 

is said to be

a) Not proved b) Disapproved

c) Proved d) None of these
by

1 Answer

Answer :

c) Proved
by

Related questions

After considering the matters before it, the Court either believes that it does not exist, or considers its non-existence that fact said to be a) Not proved b) Disapprovedc) Proved d) None of these

Description : After considering the matters before it, the Court either believes that it does not  exist, or considers its non-existence that fact said to be a) Not proved b) Disapproved c) Proved d) None of these 

Last Answer : b) Disapproved

In relation to expression defined in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act which of the following statement is not correct a) Facts include not only physical fact but also psychological facts b) Court includes arbitrators c) An inscription on a store is a document d) A fact is said to be not proved when it is neither proved nor disapproved

Description : In relation to expression defined in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act which of  the following statement is not correct a) Facts include not only physical fact but also psychological facts b) Court ... a document d) A fact is said to be not proved when it is neither proved nor disapproved

Last Answer : b) Court includes arbitrators

A fact neither proved nor disproved is known a) Not proved b) Disapproved c) Proved d) None of these

Description : A fact neither proved nor disproved is known a) Not proved b) Disapproved c) Proved d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Not proved

Whenever it is provided by this Act that the Court may presume a fact, it may either regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, or may call for proof of it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : Whenever it is provided by this Act that the Court may presume a fact, it may either  regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, or may call for proof of it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Last Answer : a) May presume

Mark the correct option a) All statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry such statements are called oral evidence b) All documents including electronic records produced for the inspection of the court called as documentary evidence c) Both the A and B are correct d) Neither A nor B are correct.

Description : Mark the correct option a) All statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by  witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry such statements are called  oral evidence b) ... documentary evidence c) Both the A and B are correct d) Neither A nor B are correct.

Last Answer : c) Both the A and B are correct

Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice

Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved

Which of the following statement is not correct? a) No fact of which the court will take notice need be proved b) The facts admitted need not be proved c) All the facts and contents of documents d) Oral evidence must be direct

Description : Which of the following statement is not correct? a) No fact of which the court will take notice need be proved b) The facts admitted need not be proved c) All the facts and contents of documents d) Oral evidence must be direct

Last Answer : c) All the facts and contents of documents

When one fact is declared by this Act to be conclusive proof of another, the Court shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : When one fact is declared by this Act to be conclusive proof of another, the Court  shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to  be given for the purpose of disproving it a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Conclusive proof

Whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these

Description : Whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall  regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved a) May presume b) Conclusive proof c) Shall presume d) None of these 

Last Answer : c) Shall presume

A document is said to be in handwriting of A that the document is produced from proper custody, If the document is purporting or proved to be years old the court may presume that is in A’s handwriting a) Thirty b) Fifteen c) Twenty d) Twelve

Description : A document is said to be in handwriting of A that the document is produced from  proper custody, If the document is purporting or proved to be years old the court may  presume that is in A’s handwriting a) Thirty b) Fifteen c) Twenty d) Twelve

Last Answer : a) Thirty

If digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic record, fact must be proved- a) That such digital signature is original signature b) That such signature is original c) That signature is no digital d) That signature is digital

Description : If digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic  record, fact must be proved- a) That such digital signature is original signature b) That such signature is original c) That signature is no digital d) That signature is digital

Last Answer : a) That such digital signature is original signature

Fact which need not be proved explained in ______of Indian evidence act. a) Part II, Chapter III b) Part II, Chapter IV c) Part III, Chapter II d) Part IV, Chapter V

Description : Fact which need not be proved explained in ______of Indian evidence act. a) Part II, Chapter III b) Part II, Chapter IV c) Part III, Chapter II d) Part IV, Chapter V

Last Answer : a) Part II, Chapter III

Fact admitted need not be proved according to a) Section 55 b) Section 56 c) Section 57 d) Section 58

Description : Fact admitted need not be proved according to  a) Section 55 b) Section 56 c) Section 57 d) Section 58

Last Answer : a) Section 55

Evidence includes- a) All statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of face under inquiry. b) All documents including electronic record produced for the inspection of the court c) Both the A & B d) None of these

Description : Evidence includes- a) All statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by  witnesses, in relation to matters of face under inquiry. b) All documents including electronic record produced for the inspection of the court c) Both the A & B d) None of these

Last Answer : c) Both the A & B

Whoever holds out any threat of injury to any public servant, or to any person in whom he believes that public servant to be interested shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ____ months, or with fine or with both. a) Six month b) Three month c) One year d) Two year

Description : Whoever holds out any threat of injury to any public servant, or to any person in  whom he believes that public servant to be interested shall be punished with  imprisonment of either description for a term which may ... fine or with both. a) Six month b) Three month c) One year d) Two year

Last Answer : a) Six month, One thousand

A is accused of murder of B by beating him whatever is said or done by A or B or by standers at beating or so shortly before or after it as to form part of transaction is a relevant fact under section- a) Section 6 b) Section 9 c) Section 12 d) Section 8

Description : A is accused of murder of B by beating him whatever is said or done by A or B or by  standers at beating or so shortly before or after it as to form part of transaction is a  relevant fact under section- a) Section 6 b) Section 9 c) Section 12 d) Section 8

Last Answer : a) Section 6

The contents of documents may be proved a) By primary evidence b) By secondary evidence c) Either A or B d) Neither A nor B

Description : The contents of documents may be proved  a) By primary evidence b) By secondary evidence c) Either A or B d) Neither A nor B

Last Answer : c) Either A or B

Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a deductive type of argument ? (A) The conclusion follows from the premise/premises necessarily. (B) The argument admits degree of complexity. (C) The argument provides us knowledge about matters of fact. (D) The argument must be either valid or invalid.

Description : Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a deductive type of argument ? (A) The conclusion follows from the premise/premises necessarily. (B) The argument admits degree of complexity. ( ... provides us knowledge about matters of fact. (D) The argument must be either valid or invalid.

Last Answer : (C) The argument provides us knowledge about matters of fact.

A witness described in detail articles decorated in room while giving statement before Court this is a a) Fact b) Document c) Opinion d) Cause

Description : A witness described in detail articles decorated in room while giving statement  before Court this is a a) Fact b) Document c) Opinion d) Cause

Last Answer : a) Fact

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other (3) between two or more States, if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Description : The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the ... (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Last Answer : (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument Explanation: Any dispute between the Union and one or more states comes under the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.

In agreements of a purely domestic nature, the intention of the parties to create legal relationship is _______. a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court b) presumed to exist c) deemed to exist d) not relevant at all

Description : In agreements of a purely domestic nature, the intention of the parties to create legal relationship is _______. a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court b) presumed to exist c) deemed to exist d) not relevant at all

Last Answer : In agreements of a purely domestic nature, the intention of the parties to create legal relationship is _______. a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court b) presumed to exist c) deemed to exist d) not relevant at all

In agreements of a purely domestic nature, the intention of the parties to create legal relationship is (a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court. (b) presumed to exist. (c) required to the extent of consideration. (d) not relevant at all.

Description : In agreements of a purely domestic nature, the intention of the parties to create legal relationship is (a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court. (b) presumed to exist. (c) required to the extent of consideration. (d) not relevant at all.

Last Answer : (a) to be proved to the satisfaction of the court.

The instruments by which the court is convinced of a fact is called a) Document b) Evidence c) Proof d) Witness

Description : The instruments by which the court is convinced of a fact is called a) Document b) Evidence c) Proof d) Witness

Last Answer : b) Evidence

Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Description : Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic  destinations, can be taken by court a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal d) None of these

Last Answer : b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar

Of which of following fact the court will not take judicial notice? a) Common law of Britain b) Law of state of Indian c) Division of time d) Local general customs and tradition of India

Description : Of which of following fact the court will not take judicial notice? a) Common law of Britain b) Law of state of Indian c) Division of time d) Local general customs and tradition of India

Last Answer : d) Local general customs and tradition of India

Court will take judicial notice of the following - a) All laws in force in territory of India b) The accession to office names, titles, functions and signatures of the persons filling for the time being any public office in any state if the fact of their appointment to such office is notified in any official gazette. c) The commencement continuance and termination of hostilities between the Government of India and any other state or body d) All the above

Description : Court will take judicial notice of the following - a) All laws in force in territory of India b) The accession to office names, titles, functions and signatures of the persons filling  for the ... of hostilities between the  Government of India and any other state or body d) All the above

Last Answer : d) All the above

Which is not a fact? a) That a man said certain words b) That a man heard something c) That a man has a certain reputation d) None of these

Description : Which is not a fact? a) That a man said certain words b) That a man heard something c) That a man has a certain reputation d) None of these

Last Answer : d) None of these

Which one of following is a fact a) Hari said b) Mohan saw c) Ram told a lie d) Any of these

Description : Which one of following is a fact a) Hari said b) Mohan saw c) Ram told a lie d) Any of these

Last Answer : d) Any of these

Personating a public servant shall be punished with(Cognizable non bailable) a) Imprisonment for a term which may be extend 2 years or with fine or both b) Imprisonment for a term which may be extend 3 years or with fine or both c) Either A or B at the discretion of the court d) None of these

Description : Personating a public servant shall be punished with(Cognizable non bailable) a) Imprisonment for a term which may be extend 2 years or with fine or both b) Imprisonment for a term which may be extend 3 years or with fine or both c) Either A or B at the discretion of the court d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Imprisonment for a term which may be extend 2 years or with fine or both

The power of comparison of handwriting of finger print under section 73 lies with a) Investigating officer b) Court c) Either A or B d) None of the se

Description : The power of comparison of handwriting of finger print under section 73 lies with a) Investigating officer b) Court c) Either A or B d) None of the se

Last Answer : a) Investigating officer

if a government servant re appoint after break in service , then it should be treated as in continuous service for medical examination for fitness checking Considering the above ruling please select the condition of break in service period a. more than one month b. more than two month c. within one year

Description : if a government servant re appoint after break in service , then it should be treated as in continuous service for medical examination for fitness checking Considering the above ruling please select the condition ... service period a. more than one month b. more than two month c. within one year

Last Answer : c. within one year

Embryological support for evolution was disapproved by (a) Karl Ernst von Baer (b) Alfred Wallace (c) Charles Darwin (d) Oparin.

Description : Embryological support for evolution was disapproved by (a) Karl Ernst von Baer (b) Alfred Wallace (c) Charles Darwin (d) Oparin.

Last Answer : (a) Karl Ernst von Baer

An auditor who believes that a material irregularity may exist should initially a. Consult legal counsel. b. Discuss the matter with those believed to be involved in the perpetration of the material irregularity. c. Discuss the matter with a higher level of management. d. Withdraw from the engagement

Description : An auditor who believes that a material irregularity may exist should initially a. Consult legal counsel. b. Discuss the matter with those believed to be involved in the perpetration of the material ... . c. Discuss the matter with a higher level of management. d. Withdraw from the engagement

Last Answer : Discuss the matter with a higher level of management.

An auditor who believes that a material irregularity may exist should initially a. Discuss the matter with those believed to be involved in the perpetration of material irregularity. b. Discuss the matter with a higher level of management. c. Withdraw from the engagement. d. Consult legal counsel.

Description : An auditor who believes that a material irregularity may exist should initially a. Discuss the matter with those believed to be involved in the perpetration of material irregularity. b. Discuss the matter with a higher level of management. c. Withdraw from the engagement. d. Consult legal counsel.

Last Answer : Discuss the matter with a higher level of management

To establish section 34 of IPC (a) Common intention be proved but not overt act be proved (b) Common intention and overt act both be proved (c) Common intention need not be proved but overt act be proved (d) All the above.

Description : To establish section 34 of IPC (a) Common intention be proved but not overt act be proved (b) Common intention and overt act both be proved (c) Common intention need not be proved but overt act be proved (d) All the above.

Last Answer : (d) All the above.

The proceedings of the legislature may be proved by (a) Oral evidence (b) Copy of such proceedings (c) The journals of those bodies or by published Acts or abstracts or by copies purporting to be printed by order of the Government concerned (d) None of these

Description : The proceedings of the legislature may be proved by (a) Oral evidence (b) Copy of such proceedings (c) The journals of those bodies or by published Acts or abstracts or by  copies purporting to be printed by order of the Government concerned (d) None of these

Last Answer : (c) The journals of those bodies or by published Acts or abstracts or by  copies purporting to be printed by order of the Government concerned

An Act, order or notification of the State Government may be proved by (a) Oral evidence (b) Journals publishing those documents (c) The records of the departments, certified by the heads of the dept or by any document purporting to be printed by order of the Government (d) None of these

Description : An Act, order or notification of the State Government may be proved by (a) Oral evidence (b) Journals publishing those documents (c) The records of the departments, certified by the heads of the dept or by  any document purporting to be printed by order of the Government (d) None of these

Last Answer : (c) The records of the departments, certified by the heads of the dept or by  any document purporting to be printed by order of the Government

Which of the following statement is correct? (a) If an attesting witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the document, its execution may be proved by primary evidence (b) If an attesting witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the document, its execution may be proved by other evidence (c) Its execution may be proved by secondary evidence (d) All the above

Description : Which of the following statement is correct? (a) If an attesting witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the  document, its execution may be proved by primary evidence (b) If an ... by other evidence (c) Its execution may be proved by secondary evidence (d) All the above

Last Answer : (b) If an attesting witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the document,  its execution may be proved by other evidence

. A photograph of an original is of its contents though two have been compared, if it is proved that thing photographed was original- a) Secondary evidence b) Primary evidence c) Primary and Secondary evidence d0 Oral evidence

Description : . A photograph of an original is of its contents though two have been compared, if it  is proved that thing photographed was original- a) Secondary evidence b) Primary evidence c) Primary and Secondary evidence d0 Oral evidence 

Last Answer : a) Secondary evidence

Public document under Indian evidence act can be proved by a) Certified copy b) Oral evidence c) Writer of certified copy d) Any of the above

Description : Public document under Indian evidence act can be proved by a) Certified copy b) Oral evidence c) Writer of certified copy d) Any of the above

Last Answer : a) Certified copy

Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only by leading secondary evidence in case of a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Description : Certified copy of will is not admissible per se in evidence. It cannot be presumed to  be primary document which could be adduced in evidence and same could be proved only  by leading secondary evidence in ... . State of Bhihar c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh d) None of these

Last Answer : a) Sampat Singh Vs. Bhagwanti

A candidates or Government servant can appeal against adverse of findings of medical Board . is it possible ? a. Possible when error of judgment happened and it is proved with evidence b. Not possible

Description : A candidates or Government servant can appeal against adverse of findings of medical Board . is it possible ? a. Possible when error of judgment happened and it is proved with evidence b. Not possible

Last Answer : a. Possible when error of judgment happened and it is proved with evidence

Particle nature of cathode rays is proved due to the fact that they (A) Travel in a straight line (B) Get deflected by magnetic electric field (C) Produce fluorescence (D) Heat the exposed material

Description : Particle nature of cathode rays is proved due to the fact that they (A) Travel in a straight line (B) Get deflected by magnetic electric field (C) Produce fluorescence (D) Heat the exposed material

Last Answer : Option B

With reference to Lok Adalats, which one among the following statements is correct? (1) Lok Adalats have the jurisdiction to settle the matters at pre-litigative state and not those matters pending before any court (2) Lok Adalats can deal with matters which are civil and not criminal in nature (3) Lok Adalats has not been given any statutory status so far (4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat

Description : With reference to Lok Adalats, which one among the following statements is correct? (1) Lok Adalats have the jurisdiction to settle the matters at pre-litigative state and not those matters pending before any court ... so far (4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat

Last Answer : (4) No appeal lies in a civil court against the order of the Lok Adalat Explanation: Award has the same effect as of a Civil Court decree. The Supreme Court has held that award of the Lok ... passed by itself. It was the legal services authority act 1987, which gave statutory status to Lok Adalat.