Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification

Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(3) A writ Explanation: Under the Indian legal system, jurisdiction to issue `prerogative writs' is given to the Supreme Court, and to the High Courts of Judicature of all Indian states. Parts of the law relating to writs are set forth in the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court, the highest in the country, may issue writs under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and under Articles 139 for enforcement of rights other than Fundamental Rights, while High Courts, the superior courts of the States, may issue writs under Articles 226. The Constitution broadly provides for five kinds of "prerogative" writs: habeas corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.
by
selected by

Related questions

A court enforces enjoyment of a Fundamental Right by issuing – (1) a decree (2) an ordinance (3) a writ (4) a notification

Description : A court enforces enjoyment of a Fundamental Right by issuing – (1) a decree (2) an ordinance (3) a writ (4) a notification

Last Answer : (3) a writ Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. The courts can issue various kinds of writs. ... Rights, while High Courts, the superior courts of the States, may issue writs under Articles 226.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Both the Supreme Court (Article 139) and the High Courts (Article 226) are empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, ... enforcement of the Fundamental Rights, the high courts can issue writs for other purposes as well.

A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (4) Habeas Corpus Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. This procedure of asking the ... release of a person from illegal detention, thereby protecting their fundamental right of life and liberty.

When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Description : When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Last Answer : (1) Article 20 and Article 21 Explanation: Indian constitution Article 359 of the Constitution authorizes the President of India to suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights during National Emergency except Article 20 and Article 21.

Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus.

Why did one of the High Courts in India decree that "bandhs are unconstitutional and punitive"? (1) It infringes on the fundamental rights of some groups of people (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom (3) It adversely affects production (4) It is not part of a right to protest

Description : Why did one of the High Courts in India decree that "bandhs are unconstitutional and punitive"? (1) It infringes on the fundamental rights of some groups of people (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom (3) It adversely affects production (4) It is not part of a right to protest

Last Answer : (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom Explanation: The Kerala High Court in 1997 declared that bandhs are unconstitutional. Freedom is seen as the will and aspiration of an individual ... blow to economy, they throw normal life out of gear, infringing upon the very concept of freedom.

In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Description : In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Last Answer : (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court Explanation: In Indian constitution, the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is vested only in the Supreme Court and the High Court. A writ ... or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention.

Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Description : Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Last Answer : (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Indian Constitution has adopted 5 Prerogative writs. Article 13 clearly states that Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights ... to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights against any authority of the State.

Which one among the following statements is not correct? (1) The right conferred by Article 32 cannot be suspended except by virtue of Article 359 (1) of the Constitution of India (2) The enforcement of Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended (3) Punishments can he prescribed by a State Legislation for offences under Part III of the Constitution of India (4) The Fundamental Rights can he abrogated by law made by the Parliament with regard to members of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order

Description : Which one among the following statements is not correct? (1) The right conferred by Article 32 cannot be suspended except by virtue of Article 359 (1) of the Constitution of India (2) The ... made by the Parliament with regard to members of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order

Last Answer : (3) Punishments can he prescribed by a State Legislation for offences under Part 111 of the Constitution of India Explanation: The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights ... law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.

Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Description : Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Last Answer : (4) Article 226 Explanation: Under Article 226 of Indian Constitution a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights. Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have ... jurisdiction. Article 35 deals with legislation to give effect to the provisions of this part.

Name the courts that are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name the courts that are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court and the High Court are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Government Rights.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights?

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights?

Last Answer : The Supreme Court, the High Court 780.

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised by the chief justice of India. (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Description : When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised ... power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Last Answer : (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State Explanation: According to Article 227(b), the Chief Justice of High Court when acts in an administrative capacity, any rules made by him ... inconsistent with the provision of any law in force and requires the previous approval of the governor.

A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Description : A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Last Answer : (1) an official to perform public duty Explanation: The term "mandamus" literally means "command." Writ of mandamus is issued to a person or lower level Court or a body by a superior Court. ... a particular act. The writ of mandamus is an effective writ that checks the functioning of the government.

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Description : Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Last Answer : (2) Prohibition Explanation: Prohibition writ is issued by the high court to the lower courts to stop legal action. A writ of prohibition is a writ directing a subordinate to stop doing something the law ... the subordinate, and the clerk prepares the writ and gives it to the Sheriff, who serves it.

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (3) Writ of Mandamus Explanation: A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means "we command" in Latin) is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by ... of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

The Supreme Court of India declares by issuing a writ that "respondent was not entitled to an office he was holding or a privilege he was exercising". Which writ is that? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Prohibition (4) Certiorari

Description : The Supreme Court of India declares by issuing a writ that "respondent was not entitled to an office he was holding or a privilege he was exercising". Which writ is that? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Prohibition (4) Certiorari

Last Answer : (2) Quo Warranto Explanation: The given provision came under a writ Quo Warranto issued by the Supreme Court of India. Quo warranto (Medieval Latin for "by what warrant?") is a prerogative writ ... what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or "franchise") they claim to hold.

With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. (3) The minimum age prescribed for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court is 40 years. (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Description : With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses ... (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Last Answer : (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. Explanation: President can promulgate ordinances when the parliament is not in session. ... take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require.

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Description : Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Last Answer : (1) Directive Principles of state policy Explanation: The Directive principles of state policy are the directions given to the state these cannot be challenged in the court.

Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Description : Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Last Answer : (1) Supreme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal as established by Part V, Chapter IV of the Constitution of India. According to the ... India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the Constitution.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Description : Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Last Answer : (1) Fundamental Rights

What kind of writ can a citizen file in case of violation of fundamental rights ?

Description : What kind of writ can a citizen file in case of violation of fundamental rights ?

Last Answer : Can file four types of writ.

How can the number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased? (1) Representation from the Supreme Court (2) By amendment of the Constitution (3) By a Parliamentary Act (4) By Presidential notification

Description : How can the number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased? (1) Representation from the Supreme Court (2) By amendment of the Constitution (3) By a Parliamentary Act (4) By Presidential notification

Last Answer : (2) By amendment of the Constitution Explanation: By amendment of constitution number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased.

The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Description : The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Last Answer : (3) Parliament by Law Explanation: The no judges can be modified in the court Supreme Court by parliament by laws.

Name any two writs issued by the courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name any two writs issued by the courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : (i) Certiorari: It is an order by the Supreme Court to the judicial or quasi-judicial authorities to quash its order or decision. Prohibition is issued when certain proceedings are still going on. ... the legality of his holding a public office and ousts him if his claim is not well founded.

The writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is issued in the event of – (1) Los of property (2) Refund of excess taxes (3) Wrongful police detention (4) Violation of the freedom of speech

Description : The writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is issued in the event of – (1) Los of property (2) Refund of excess taxes (3) Wrongful police detention (4) Violation of the freedom of speech

Last Answer : (3) Wrongful police detention Explanation: Habeas corpus means "you must present the person in court". It is a writ (legal action) which requires a person under arrest to be brought ... prisoner can be released from unlawful detention, in other words, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence.

An ordinance issued by Governor is subject to approval by – (1) The President (2) The State Legislature (3) The State Council of Ministers (4) The Parliament

Description : An ordinance issued by Governor is subject to approval by – (1) The President (2) The State Legislature (3) The State Council of Ministers (4) The Parliament

Last Answer : (2) The State Legislature Explanation: Article 213 of the constitution provides that Governor of the state can promulgate ordinance. The same article states that once an ordinance is passed, it should ... both the houses and approved by then within six weeks of their respective dates of reassembly.

An ordinance issued by the Governor, without the approval of the State Legislature shall be effective for a period of – (1) Six months (2) Six weeks (3) One year (4) One month

Description : An ordinance issued by the Governor, without the approval of the State Legislature shall be effective for a period of – (1) Six months (2) Six weeks (3) One year (4) One month

Last Answer : (2) Six weeks Explanation: The Governor has the power of making ordinances during the recess of the legislature to meet some emergency. A Governor's Ordinance ceases to operate six weeks after the reassembly of the legislature if not disapproved by the state legislature.

An ordinance issued by the Governor has to be passed by the Assembly within - (1) 8 weeks (2) 10 weeks (3) 12 weeks (4) 6 weeks

Description : An ordinance issued by the Governor has to be passed by the Assembly within - (1) 8 weeks (2) 10 weeks (3) 12 weeks (4) 6 weeks

Last Answer : (4) 6 weeks Explanation: As per Article 213 of Indian Constitution, an Ordinance promulgated by the Governor of a state has to be laid before the Legislative Assembly or where there is a ... a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council.

A Presidential Ordinance can remain in force – (1) For three months (2) For six months (3) For nine months (4) Indefinitely

Description : A Presidential Ordinance can remain in force – (1) For three months (2) For six months (3) For nine months (4) Indefinitely

Last Answer : (2) For six months Explanation: The Indian constitution under Article 123 gives special legislative powers to President of India for promulgating ordinance under certain circumstances. If a legislation is ... resolution is passed by Parliament against it. The ordinance remains in force for 6 months.

What is the time limit given to Parliament to pass the ordinance promulgated by the President of India? (1) 6 days (2) 6 weeks (3) 6 months (4) 6 months and six weeks

Description : What is the time limit given to Parliament to pass the ordinance promulgated by the President of India? (1) 6 days (2) 6 weeks (3) 6 months (4) 6 months and six weeks

Last Answer : (2) 6 weeks Explanation: Ordinances remain valid for no more than six weeks from the date the Parliament is convened unless approved by it earlier.

The voting age in India was lowered from 21 year to 18 years through – (1) Presidential ordinance. (2) Constitutional Amendment. (3) Executive Order. (4) Parliamentary Legislation.

Description : The voting age in India was lowered from 21 year to 18 years through – (1) Presidential ordinance. (2) Constitutional Amendment. (3) Executive Order. (4) Parliamentary Legislation.

Last Answer : (2) Constitutional Amendment Explanation: The minimum age of voting in India was lowered from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Amendment Act in .1988 read with Act 21 of 1989.

Which constitutional Amendment deleted the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights? (1) 42nd Amendment (2) 62nd Amendment (3) 44th Amendment (4) 43rd Amendment

Description : Which constitutional Amendment deleted the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights? (1) 42nd Amendment (2) 62nd Amendment (3) 44th Amendment (4) 43rd Amendment

Last Answer : (3) 44th Amendment Explanation: The Constitution originally provided for the right to property under Articles 19 and 31. The Forty-Forth Amendment of 1978 deleted the right to property from the list of fundamental rights. So it is now a legal right, not a fundamental right.

The mind of the makers of the Constitution of India is reflected in which of the following? (1) The Preamble (2) The Fundamental Rights (3) The Directive Principles of State Policy (4) The Fundamental Duties

Description : The mind of the makers of the Constitution of India is reflected in which of the following? (1) The Preamble (2) The Fundamental Rights (3) The Directive Principles of State Policy (4) The Fundamental Duties

Last Answer : (1) The Preamble Explanation: Sir Alladi Krishnaswami Iyer, a member of the Constituent Assembly, had said 'The Preamble to our Constitution expresses what we had thought or dreamt so long." So "A" is the answer.

Economic presence of the government in social realm is found under - (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Fundamental Duties (3) Directive Principles of State Policy (4) Policy for determining citizenship

Description : Economic presence of the government in social realm is found under - (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Fundamental Duties (3) Directive Principles of State Policy (4) Policy for determining citizenship

Last Answer : (3) Directive Principles of State Policy Explanation: The principles have been inspired by the Directive Principles given in the Constitution of Ireland and also by the principles of Gandhism; and relate to social justice, economic welfare, foreign policy, and legal and administrative matters.

Which one of the following categories of persons is not treated at par so far as the availability of Fundamental Rights is concerned? (1) Members of the armed forces (2) Members of the forces charged with the responsibility of maintenance of public order (3) Members of the forces employed in connection with the communication systems set up in the country (4) Members of the forces employed in connection with the communication systems set up for maintenance of public order

Description : Which one of the following categories of persons is not treated at par so far as the availability of Fundamental Rights is concerned? (1) Members of the armed forces (2) Members of ... Members of the forces employed in connection with the communication systems set up for maintenance of public order

Last Answer : a) Members of the armed forces Explanation: Members of Armed Forces are not treated at par so far as the availability of Fundamental Rights is concerned.

The Constitution of India guarantees the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion to all its citizens. Which among the following is not true for this Rights? (1) It gives freedom of conscience and freedom to profess, practice and propagate any religion (2) It gives freedom to establish and maintain institution for religious and charitable purposes (3) The Right is subject to public order, morality and health (4) The State cannot make any law which abrogates this Right for citizens

Description : The Constitution of India guarantees the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion to all its citizens. Which among the following is not true for this Rights? (1) It gives freedom of conscience and ... , morality and health (4) The State cannot make any law which abrogates this Right for citizens

Last Answer : (4) The State cannot make any law which abrogates this Right for citizens Explanation: The state can make laws which abrogate the right in case there is a threat to public order, morality and health.

The citizens of India do not have which one of the following Fundamental Rights? (1) Right to reside and settle in any part of India (2) Right to acquire, hold and dispose of property (3) Right to practice any profession (4) Right to form co-operative societies

Description : The citizens of India do not have which one of the following Fundamental Rights? (1) Right to reside and settle in any part of India (2) Right to acquire, hold and dispose of property (3) Right to practice any profession (4) Right to form co-operative societies

Last Answer : (2) Right to acquire, hold and dispose of property.

The philosophical foundation of the Indian constitution is - (1) Directive principle of state policy (2) Fundamental rights (3) Federal structure (4) Preamble

Description : The philosophical foundation of the Indian constitution is - (1) Directive principle of state policy (2) Fundamental rights (3) Federal structure (4) Preamble

Last Answer : (4) Preamble Explanation: Preamble is the philosophical foundation of the Indian constitution.

Which of the following Fundamental Rights includes the Right to Education? (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Freedom (3) Cultural and Educational Rights (4) Right to Constitutional Remedies

Description : Which of the following Fundamental Rights includes the Right to Education? (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Freedom (3) Cultural and Educational Rights (4) Right to Constitutional Remedies

Last Answer : (2) Right to Freedom Explanation: Right to education is a part of Right to freedom (Article 21A). Right to education inserted in constitution through 86th amendment act. According to this fundamental right for ... the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the state may, by law determine."