A court enforces enjoyment of a Fundamental Right by issuing – (1) a decree (2) an ordinance (3) a writ (4) a notification

A court enforces enjoyment of a Fundamental Right by issuing – (1) a decree (2) an ordinance (3) a writ (4) a notification
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(3) a writ Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. The courts can issue various kinds of writs. The Supreme Court, the highest in the country, may issue writs under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and under Articles 139 for enforcement of rights other than Fundamental Rights, while High Courts, the superior courts of the States, may issue writs under Articles 226.
by
selected by

Related questions

Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification

Description : Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification

Last Answer : (3) A writ Explanation: Under the Indian legal system, jurisdiction to issue `prerogative writs' is given to the Supreme Court, and to the High Courts of Judicature of all Indian states. ... for five kinds of "prerogative" writs: habeas corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.

The Supreme Court of India declares by issuing a writ that "respondent was not entitled to an office he was holding or a privilege he was exercising". Which writ is that? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Prohibition (4) Certiorari

Description : The Supreme Court of India declares by issuing a writ that "respondent was not entitled to an office he was holding or a privilege he was exercising". Which writ is that? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Prohibition (4) Certiorari

Last Answer : (2) Quo Warranto Explanation: The given provision came under a writ Quo Warranto issued by the Supreme Court of India. Quo warranto (Medieval Latin for "by what warrant?") is a prerogative writ ... what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or "franchise") they claim to hold.

A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (4) Habeas Corpus Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. This procedure of asking the ... release of a person from illegal detention, thereby protecting their fundamental right of life and liberty.

Why did one of the High Courts in India decree that "bandhs are unconstitutional and punitive"? (1) It infringes on the fundamental rights of some groups of people (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom (3) It adversely affects production (4) It is not part of a right to protest

Description : Why did one of the High Courts in India decree that "bandhs are unconstitutional and punitive"? (1) It infringes on the fundamental rights of some groups of people (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom (3) It adversely affects production (4) It is not part of a right to protest

Last Answer : (2) It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom Explanation: The Kerala High Court in 1997 declared that bandhs are unconstitutional. Freedom is seen as the will and aspiration of an individual ... blow to economy, they throw normal life out of gear, infringing upon the very concept of freedom.

Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Description : Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Last Answer : (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty Explanation: Right to life and personal liberty is Article 21 of Fundamental rights. Without this right, for an individual to enjoy other fundamental rights become meaningless.

When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised by the chief justice of India. (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Description : When the chief justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to - (1) The writ jurisdiction of any of the other judges of the High Court. (2) Special control exercised ... power of the Governor of the State (4) Special powers provided to the Chief Minister in this regard

Last Answer : (3) Discretionary power of the Governor of the State Explanation: According to Article 227(b), the Chief Justice of High Court when acts in an administrative capacity, any rules made by him ... inconsistent with the provision of any law in force and requires the previous approval of the governor.

In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Description : In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Last Answer : (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court Explanation: In Indian constitution, the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is vested only in the Supreme Court and the High Court. A writ ... or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention.

A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Description : A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Last Answer : (1) an official to perform public duty Explanation: The term "mandamus" literally means "command." Writ of mandamus is issued to a person or lower level Court or a body by a superior Court. ... a particular act. The writ of mandamus is an effective writ that checks the functioning of the government.

Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Description : Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Last Answer : (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Indian Constitution has adopted 5 Prerogative writs. Article 13 clearly states that Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights ... to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights against any authority of the State.

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Description : Which writ is issued by the High court to the lower courts to stop legal action? (1) Habeas Corpus (2) Prohibition (3) Quo Warranto (4) Certiorari

Last Answer : (2) Prohibition Explanation: Prohibition writ is issued by the high court to the lower courts to stop legal action. A writ of prohibition is a writ directing a subordinate to stop doing something the law ... the subordinate, and the clerk prepares the writ and gives it to the Sheriff, who serves it.

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which Writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (1) Writ of Certiorari (2) Writ of Habeas Corpus (3) Writ of Mandamus (4) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (3) Writ of Mandamus Explanation: A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means "we command" in Latin) is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by ... of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. (3) The minimum age prescribed for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court is 40 years. (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Description : With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses ... (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Last Answer : (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. Explanation: President can promulgate ordinances when the parliament is not in session. ... take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require.

How can the number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased? (1) Representation from the Supreme Court (2) By amendment of the Constitution (3) By a Parliamentary Act (4) By Presidential notification

Description : How can the number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased? (1) Representation from the Supreme Court (2) By amendment of the Constitution (3) By a Parliamentary Act (4) By Presidential notification

Last Answer : (2) By amendment of the Constitution Explanation: By amendment of constitution number of judges in the Supreme Court in India be increased.

The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Description : The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Last Answer : (3) Parliament by Law Explanation: The no judges can be modified in the court Supreme Court by parliament by laws.

Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation and business (2) Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Description : Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation ... any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Last Answer : (4) Freedom of the press Explanation: The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Description : The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Last Answer : (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the Private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under Article 19 (1) (1) of the constitution.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Description : When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Last Answer : (1) Article 20 and Article 21 Explanation: Indian constitution Article 359 of the Constitution authorizes the President of India to suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights during National Emergency except Article 20 and Article 21.

Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Description : Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Last Answer : (1) Directive Principles of state policy Explanation: The Directive principles of state policy are the directions given to the state these cannot be challenged in the court.

Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Description : Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Last Answer : (1) Right to privacy Explanation: Judicial activism has brought the Right to Privacy within the realm of Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court of India has construed "right to privacy" as a part of ... conceive to be their duty must strictly and scrupulously observe the forms and rules of the law".

Which writ may be issued to enforce a Fundamental Right?

Description : Which writ may be issued to enforce a Fundamental Right?

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus

Which writ may be issued to enforce a Fundamental Right?

Description : Which writ may be issued to enforce a Fundamental Right?

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus

The writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is issued in the event of – (1) Los of property (2) Refund of excess taxes (3) Wrongful police detention (4) Violation of the freedom of speech

Description : The writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is issued in the event of – (1) Los of property (2) Refund of excess taxes (3) Wrongful police detention (4) Violation of the freedom of speech

Last Answer : (3) Wrongful police detention Explanation: Habeas corpus means "you must present the person in court". It is a writ (legal action) which requires a person under arrest to be brought ... prisoner can be released from unlawful detention, in other words, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence.

An ordinance issued by Governor is subject to approval by – (1) The President (2) The State Legislature (3) The State Council of Ministers (4) The Parliament

Description : An ordinance issued by Governor is subject to approval by – (1) The President (2) The State Legislature (3) The State Council of Ministers (4) The Parliament

Last Answer : (2) The State Legislature Explanation: Article 213 of the constitution provides that Governor of the state can promulgate ordinance. The same article states that once an ordinance is passed, it should ... both the houses and approved by then within six weeks of their respective dates of reassembly.

An ordinance issued by the Governor, without the approval of the State Legislature shall be effective for a period of – (1) Six months (2) Six weeks (3) One year (4) One month

Description : An ordinance issued by the Governor, without the approval of the State Legislature shall be effective for a period of – (1) Six months (2) Six weeks (3) One year (4) One month

Last Answer : (2) Six weeks Explanation: The Governor has the power of making ordinances during the recess of the legislature to meet some emergency. A Governor's Ordinance ceases to operate six weeks after the reassembly of the legislature if not disapproved by the state legislature.

An ordinance issued by the Governor has to be passed by the Assembly within - (1) 8 weeks (2) 10 weeks (3) 12 weeks (4) 6 weeks

Description : An ordinance issued by the Governor has to be passed by the Assembly within - (1) 8 weeks (2) 10 weeks (3) 12 weeks (4) 6 weeks

Last Answer : (4) 6 weeks Explanation: As per Article 213 of Indian Constitution, an Ordinance promulgated by the Governor of a state has to be laid before the Legislative Assembly or where there is a ... a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council.

A Presidential Ordinance can remain in force – (1) For three months (2) For six months (3) For nine months (4) Indefinitely

Description : A Presidential Ordinance can remain in force – (1) For three months (2) For six months (3) For nine months (4) Indefinitely

Last Answer : (2) For six months Explanation: The Indian constitution under Article 123 gives special legislative powers to President of India for promulgating ordinance under certain circumstances. If a legislation is ... resolution is passed by Parliament against it. The ordinance remains in force for 6 months.

What is the time limit given to Parliament to pass the ordinance promulgated by the President of India? (1) 6 days (2) 6 weeks (3) 6 months (4) 6 months and six weeks

Description : What is the time limit given to Parliament to pass the ordinance promulgated by the President of India? (1) 6 days (2) 6 weeks (3) 6 months (4) 6 months and six weeks

Last Answer : (2) 6 weeks Explanation: Ordinances remain valid for no more than six weeks from the date the Parliament is convened unless approved by it earlier.

The voting age in India was lowered from 21 year to 18 years through – (1) Presidential ordinance. (2) Constitutional Amendment. (3) Executive Order. (4) Parliamentary Legislation.

Description : The voting age in India was lowered from 21 year to 18 years through – (1) Presidential ordinance. (2) Constitutional Amendment. (3) Executive Order. (4) Parliamentary Legislation.

Last Answer : (2) Constitutional Amendment Explanation: The minimum age of voting in India was lowered from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Amendment Act in .1988 read with Act 21 of 1989.

Notification regarding commencement on cessation of a state of war is the responsibility of - (1) Ministry of Home Affairs (2) Ministry of Defence (3) Ministry of External Affairs (4) None of the above

Description : Notification regarding commencement on cessation of a state of war is the responsibility of - (1) Ministry of Home Affairs (2) Ministry of Defence (3) Ministry of External Affairs (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) Ministry of External Affairs Explanation: Notification regarding commencement or cessation of a state of war is the responsibility of Ministry of External Affairs.

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Both the Supreme Court (Article 139) and the High Courts (Article 226) are empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, ... enforcement of the Fundamental Rights, the high courts can issue writs for other purposes as well.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Description : Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Last Answer : (1) Supreme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal as established by Part V, Chapter IV of the Constitution of India. According to the ... India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the Constitution.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Description : Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Last Answer : (1) Fundamental Rights

Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Description : Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Last Answer : (4) Article 226 Explanation: Under Article 226 of Indian Constitution a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights. Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have ... jurisdiction. Article 35 deals with legislation to give effect to the provisions of this part.

Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus.

What kind of writ can a citizen file in case of violation of fundamental rights ?

Description : What kind of writ can a citizen file in case of violation of fundamental rights ?

Last Answer : Can file four types of writ.

Why do you think the police enforces us to wear our seat belts?

Description : Why do you think the police enforces us to wear our seat belts?

Last Answer : If you become a projectile through your own stupidity, it affects others. You become 100+ pounds of pain and damage. Don’t think so narrowly.

What US government agency creates and enforces standards for workplace health and safety?

Description : What US government agency creates and enforces standards for workplace health and safety?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

Which writ is issued by the court in’ case of illegal detention of a person? -Do You Know?

Description : Which writ is issued by the court in’ case of illegal detention of a person? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Which of the following writ is issued by a higher court to a lower court?

Description : Which of the following writ is issued by a higher court to a lower court?

Last Answer : Prohibition

Which writ is issued by the court in case of illegal detention of a person?

Description : Which writ is issued by the court in case of illegal detention of a person?

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus

Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (C) Writ of Mandamus

Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Description : Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court to compel an authority to perform a function that it was not performing? (A) Writ of Certiorari (B) Writ of Habeas Corpus (C) Writ of Mandamus (D) Writ of Quo Warranto

Last Answer : (C) Writ of Mandamus