How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?

How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

how the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law wereextended by landmark court cases
by
selected by

Related questions

THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Description : THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Last Answer : Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want

Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a federal system? (1) There are two distinct levels of government (2) The responsibilities and powers of each level of government are clearly defined in a written Constitution (3) There is no separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government (4) A Supreme Court is entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting these provisions and arbitrating in matters of dispute

Description : Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a federal system? (1) There are two distinct levels of government (2) The responsibilities and powers of each level of ... Court is entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting these provisions and arbitrating in matters of dispute

Last Answer : (3) There is no separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government Explanation: One of the features of the federal system is the distribution of power ... importance. Both federal and state governments functioning strictly within the sphere demarcated for them.

_______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan(b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Description : _______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan (b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Last Answer : (b) India

The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Description : The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Last Answer : (2) Inter-State disputes Explanation: The Supreme Court. has exclusive original jurisdiction over any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any ... of a legal right depend. In this capacity, it serves as the federal court of India.

The power to enlarge the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India with respect to any matter included in the Union list of legislative powers rests with: (1) The President of India (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Parliament (4) The Union Ministry of Law

Description : The power to enlarge the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India with respect to any matter included in the Union list of legislative powers rests with: (1) The President of India (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) The Parliament (4) The Union Ministry of Law

Last Answer : (3) The Parliament Explanation: The parliament can regulate the organization and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It can expand the jurisdiction but can't curtail the same.

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Description : In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Last Answer : Need answer

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

Describe the powers of the Supreme Court. -Civics 9th

Description : Describe the powers of the Supreme Court. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. ... Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution.

Describe the powers of the Supreme Court. -Civics 9th

Description : Describe the powers of the Supreme Court. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : (i) The Supreme Court can take up disputes between governments, citizens and government, governments at the union and state level. (ii) Highest Court of justice and hears appeals against High ... legislature or executive invalid. (v) People can approach Supreme Court if their rights are violated.

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Last Answer : (1) Indian Parliament is supreme Explanation: Though the Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India, the legislation passed by parliament may be challenged in Supreme Court. The ... houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President. 

Last Answer : (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review.

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

When are cases heard by supreme court?

Description : When are cases heard by supreme court?

Last Answer : The Supreme Court is the court of last resort. When all appealsand lower courts have heard and ruled on a case it may go to theSupreme Court, but the court doesn’t have to hear it and may letthe lower ruling stand or kick it back to the lower federalcourt.

What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Description : What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Last Answer : Need answer

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Description : How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Description : What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Description : How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Last Answer : The justices of the Supreme Court only take on the cases that they wish to hear. Typically no more than 100 cases are heard by the court each year.

In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Description : In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Last Answer : (3) Both (1) and (b) Explanation: The Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award in the case of interstate river water disputes and delimitation of constitution.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?

Description : What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?

Last Answer : Need answer

Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Description : Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Last Answer : Yes! Great idea. @ragingloli

What Supreme Court appointed by the executive branch was a feature of which plan for the federal government president at the constitutional convention?

Description : What Supreme Court appointed by the executive branch was a feature of which plan for the federal government president at the constitutional convention?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Which of the following is a feature to both the Indian Federation and the American Federation? (1) A single citizenship (2) Dual judiciary (3) Three Lists in the Constitution (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution

Description : Which of the following is a feature to both the Indian Federation and the American Federation? (1) A single citizenship (2) Dual judiciary (3) Three Lists in the Constitution (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution

Last Answer : (4) A Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution Explanation: According to the Constitution of India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the ... and advisory jurisdiction. It functioned until 1950, when the Supreme Court. of India was established.

Who makes federal laws? Choose one: a. Congress. b. The states. c. The President. d. The Supreme Court.

Description : Who makes federal laws? Choose one: a. Congress. b. The states. c. The President. d. The Supreme Court.

Last Answer : Correct Answer: a. Congress.

Which governing principle is best reflected by the three branches of the federal government created by the Constitution A) limited government B)republicanism C)rule of law D)separation of powers?

Description : Which governing principle is best reflected by the three branches of the federal government created by the Constitution A) limited government B)republicanism C)rule of law D)separation of powers?

Last Answer : That is separation of powers.

Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Description : Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Last Answer : common law

Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Description : Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Last Answer : Answer: National Company Law Tribunal

If the President of India considers that a question of law may be referred to the Supreme Court, under which jurisdiction will the Supreme Court express its opinion in the matter? -SST 10th

Description : If the President of India considers that a question of law may be referred to the Supreme Court, under which jurisdiction will the Supreme Court express its opinion in the matter? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Advisory Jurisdiction.

Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal can appeal to which one of the following and within how much period ? (A) High Court, within 30 days (B) Supreme Court within 60 days (C) SEBI within 90 days (D) Department of Companies Affairs within 60 days

Description : Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal can appeal to which one of the following and within how much period ? (A) High Court, within 30 days (B) ... Court within 60 days (C) SEBI within 90 days (D) Department of Companies Affairs within 60 days

Last Answer : Answer: Supreme Court within 60 days

Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Description : Which one of the following is correct about the Supreme Court regarding its judgement? (1) It cannot change the judgement (2) Only the Chief Justice of India can change the judgement (3) It can change the judgement (4) Only the Ministry of Law can change the judgement.

Last Answer : (3) It can change the judgement Explanation: Supreme Court can only change its position in a case decided earlier by it where it considers for good and substantial reasons to overrule itself on an application if the need arises.

Who is authorised to transfer the Judge of one High Court to another High Court? (1) The President (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) A Collegium of Judges of the Supreme Court (4) The Law Minister

Description : Who is authorised to transfer the Judge of one High Court to another High Court? (1) The President (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) A Collegium of Judges of the Supreme Court (4) The Law Minister

Last Answer : (1) The President Explanation: Article 222 empowers the President to transfer judges from one High. Court to another. Clause (2) of this article goes on to provide that when a judge is so ... there is no real justification for granting such an allowance and it is accordingly proposed to omit clause.

The Attorney General of India has the right of audience in – (1) the Supreme Court (2) any High Court (3) any Sessions Court (4) any Court of Law within India

Description : The Attorney General of India has the right of audience in – (1) the Supreme Court (2) any High Court (3) any Sessions Court (4) any Court of Law within India

Last Answer : (4) any Court of Law within India Explanation: The Attorney General has the right of audience in all Courts in India as well as the right to participate in the proceedings of the Parliament, ... the Indian government's chief legal advisor, and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India.

Who advises the Government of India on legal matters? (1) Attorney General (2) Chief justice of Supreme Court (3) Chairman, Law Commission (4) None of these

Description : Who advises the Government of India on legal matters? (1) Attorney General (2) Chief justice of Supreme Court (3) Chairman, Law Commission (4) None of these

Last Answer : (1) Attorney General Explanation: Attorney general of India, appointed by President, advises the government of India on legal matters. Presently Venugopal is an Attorney General of India.

Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India. (2) There is one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency. (3) The Parliament has the power to make laws relating to the delimitation of constituencies. (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Description : Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India ... has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies. Explanation: Under Article 82 of the constitution, ... the delimitation commission demarcates the boundary of parliamentary constituency on the basis of Delimitation Act.

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other (3) between two or more States, if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Description : The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the ... (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Last Answer : (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument Explanation: Any dispute between the Union and one or more states comes under the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.

Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in India is appointed by the - (1) Chief Justice of Supreme Court (2) Prime Minister (3) President (4) Law Minister

Description : Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in India is appointed by the - (1) Chief Justice of Supreme Court (2) Prime Minister (3) President (4) Law Minister

Last Answer : (3) President Explanation: The President of India appoints the Chief Justice of Supreme court as per the following procedure. The Government of India proposes the name of the most senior Judge of the ... of the Supreme Court and the Judges of State High Courts, as the President may think necessary.

The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Description : The number of judges can be modified in the Supreme Court by - (1) Presidential Order (2) Supreme Court by Notification (3) Parliament by Law (4) Central Government by notification

Last Answer : (3) Parliament by Law Explanation: The no judges can be modified in the court Supreme Court by parliament by laws.

Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any judge of the High Court (4) All of the above

Description : Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any judge of the High Court (4) All of the above

Last Answer : (2) President Explanation: According to Article 143 of the Constitution of India, the President of India can request the Supreme Court of India to provide its advice on certain matters. This procedure is called "Presidential Reference".

Under which law it is prescribed that all proceedings in the Supreme Court of India shall be in English language? (1) The Supreme Court Rules, 1966 (2) A Legislation made by the Parliament (3) Article 145 of the Constitution of India (4) Article 348 of the Constitution of India

Description : Under which law it is prescribed that all proceedings in the Supreme Court of India shall be in English language? (1) The Supreme Court Rules, 1966 (2) A Legislation made by the Parliament (3) Article 145 of the Constitution of India (4) Article 348 of the Constitution of India

Last Answer : (4) Article 348 of the Constitution of India Explanation: Article 348 of Indian Constitution mentions the language to be used in Supreme Court and the High Courts. According to the article 348, the language of all proceedings in the Supreme court and in every high court shall be English.

Who is authorized to transfer the judges of one High Court to another High Court? (1) The President (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) A collegium of judges of the Supreme Court. (4) The Law Minister

Description : Who is authorized to transfer the judges of one High Court to another High Court? (1) The President (2) The Chief Justice of India (3) A collegium of judges of the Supreme Court. (4) The Law Minister

Last Answer : (1) The President Explanation: The President may, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, transfer a judge from one high court to any other high court. When a judge has been or is ... commencement of the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, as a Judge of the other High Court.

Who is the Chief Law Officer of the Government of India? (1) The Chief Justice of India (2) The Registrar of the Supreme Court (3) The Law Minister of India (4) The Attorney General of India

Description : Who is the Chief Law Officer of the Government of India? (1) The Chief Justice of India (2) The Registrar of the Supreme Court (3) The Law Minister of India (4) The Attorney General of India

Last Answer : (4) The Attorney General of India Explanation: The Attorney General of India is the Indian government's chief legal advisor, and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. He is appointed by the ... the President. He must be a person qualified to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court.

What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Description : What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Last Answer : (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government Explanation: An ordinary law is a normal law, generally distinguished from a constitutional law. It is made and enforced by the competent authorities of ... to the State and to one another. An ordinary law requires only simple majority in Parliament.

Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Description : Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Last Answer : (1) Right to privacy Explanation: Judicial activism has brought the Right to Privacy within the realm of Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court of India has construed "right to privacy" as a part of ... conceive to be their duty must strictly and scrupulously observe the forms and rules of the law".