What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?

What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

Need answer
by

Related questions

The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Description : The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Last Answer : (2) Inter-State disputes Explanation: The Supreme Court. has exclusive original jurisdiction over any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any ... of a legal right depend. In this capacity, it serves as the federal court of India.

How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?

Description : How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?

Last Answer : how the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law wereextended by landmark court cases

Which is the highest Court of Justice for civil cases at the District level? -SST 10th

Description : Which is the highest Court of Justice for civil cases at the District level? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Civil Court—Court of District Judge.

4. This Innovative science of Operations Research was discovered during ________ a. Civil War b. World War I c. World War II d. Industrial Revolution

Description : 4. This Innovative science of Operations Research was discovered during ________ a. Civil War b. World War I c. World War II d. Industrial Revolution

Last Answer : c. World War II

The innovative science of Operations Research was discovered during ...................... a. Civil war b. World war I c. World war II d. Industrial Revolution

Description : The innovative science of Operations Research was discovered during ...................... a. Civil war b. World war I c. World war II d. Industrial Revolution

Last Answer : c. World war II

Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Description : Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Last Answer : (4) against a general topic Explanation: Although the proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or orders made by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of ... India only and perhaps no other Court in the world has been exercising this extraordinary jurisdiction.

Which Courts have Original Jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases? -SST 10th

Description : Which Courts have Original Jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Presidency High Courts have Original Jurisdiction in almost all civil and criminal cases.

The National Green Tribunal deals with cases relating to : (1) Issues relating to protection and conservation of historical monuments. (2) Civil cases (3) Criminal offences (4) Environmental protection and conservation of forests.

Description : The National Green Tribunal deals with cases relating to : (1) Issues relating to protection and conservation of historical monuments. (2) Civil cases (3) Criminal offences (4) Environmental protection and conservation of forests.

Last Answer : (4) Environmental protection and conservation of forests Explanation: The National Green Tribunal was established on 18 October 2010 under the National Green Tribunal Act 2010 for effective and ... natural resources. It is responsible for enforcement of any legal right relating to environment.

Members of Parliament enjoy the Privilege of freedom from arrest in — (1) Criminal Cases (2) Civil Cases (3) Preventive detention (4) All types of cases

Description : Members of Parliament enjoy the Privilege of freedom from arrest in — (1) Criminal Cases (2) Civil Cases (3) Preventive detention (4) All types of cases

Last Answer : (2) Civil Cases Explanation: Members of Parliament enjoy the Privilege of freedom from arrest in Civil Cases.

When will Pre Audit of Estimates is applicable a . on estimates of work of Government department executed through Civil wingb . The amount incurred for work is very high c Both cases

Description : When will Pre Audit of Estimates is applicable a . on estimates of work of Government department executed through Civil wing b . The amount incurred for work is very high c Both cases

Last Answer : a . on estimates of work of Government department executed through Civil wing

How did the wilmington riots of 1898 contributed to the decline in federal protection of civil rights?

Description : How did the wilmington riots of 1898 contributed to the decline in federal protection of civil rights?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is the theme topic sentence for war of the worlds chapter 4?

Description : What is the theme topic sentence for war of the worlds chapter 4?

Last Answer : Do you know? :)

Do you think former jurors on big court cases should be prevented from selling their stories for a profit?

Description : Do you think former jurors on big court cases should be prevented from selling their stories for a profit?

Last Answer : answer:How would you prevent it? and why? I guess as a general rule I don’t think things should be regulated unless there’s someone who is harmed by it directly. If someone will pay for their point of view and opinions, it’s completely theirs to give.

What are the court cases that highlight the republican party's distribution of misleading election materials to minority and immigrant neighborhoods in NJ?

Description : What are the court cases that highlight the republican party's distribution of misleading election materials to minority and immigrant neighborhoods in NJ?

Last Answer : And folks wonder why I sometimes bash NJ politics/politicians.

Which cases does the district level court deal with ? -SST 10th

Description : Which cases does the district level court deal with ? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The district level court deals with cases involving claims up to Rs 20 lakhs.

Mention three cases in which the High Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction. -SST 10th

Description : Mention three cases in which the High Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Original Jurisdiction extends to those cases which High Court has authority to hear and decide in the first instance. (i) The cases regarding wills, divorce, marriage Admiralty, Company Law and ... has the power to interpret the Constitution. This is known as the power of Judicial Review.

Which kind of cases does a Commissioner’s Court take up? -SST 10th

Description : Which kind of cases does a Commissioner’s Court take up? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Commissioner’s Court takes up the cases relating to assessment and collection of revenue.

Which kind of cases does the Tehsildar’s Court deal with? -SST 10th

Description : Which kind of cases does the Tehsildar’s Court deal with? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Tehsildar’s Court deals with the cases relating to the assessment of land revenue and property tax.

Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Description : Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Criminal Courts: From 31st March, 1973, a new Criminal Procedure Act came into effect. Criminal Courts deal with criminal cases. These courts are divided into four categories: The Session Courts: The Session ... rioting. He can award imprisonment for not more than one month and a fine upto Rs. 50.

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

What are the most common cases seen in family court?

Description : What are the most common cases seen in family court?

Last Answer : According to my opinion, the most common cases seen in family courts revolve around domestic violence, divorce issues, child custody, child visitation issues, child abuse or child support issues, spousal support and adoption.

When are cases heard by supreme court?

Description : When are cases heard by supreme court?

Last Answer : The Supreme Court is the court of last resort. When all appealsand lower courts have heard and ruled on a case it may go to theSupreme Court, but the court doesn’t have to hear it and may letthe lower ruling stand or kick it back to the lower federalcourt.

What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Description : What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Last Answer : Need answer

Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Description : Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Description : Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Last Answer : common law

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Description : How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Description : What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Description : How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Last Answer : The justices of the Supreme Court only take on the cases that they wish to hear. Typically no more than 100 cases are heard by the court each year.

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Description : Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Last Answer : Answer: National Company Law Tribunal

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Description : In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Last Answer : (3) Both (1) and (b) Explanation: The Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award in the case of interstate river water disputes and delimitation of constitution.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the offender shall be punished for the offence a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all b) For which the highest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all c) Shall be reduced but subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of reduction d) None of the above

Description : In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several  offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is  guilty, the offender ... subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of  reduction d) None of the above

Last Answer : a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all

Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice

Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved

Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Description : Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Last Answer : Yes! Great idea. @ragingloli

Was Aaron Burr a lawyer of the Southern District of New York Federal Court?

Description : Was Aaron Burr a lawyer of the Southern District of New York Federal Court?

Last Answer : He was appointed New York AG the same year that the Federal district system was established. So you could make the argument.

If you are opposed to the death penalty, would you suspend your opposition if Dzhokar Tsarnaev is found guilty in federal court of a capital crime?

Description : If you are opposed to the death penalty, would you suspend your opposition if Dzhokar Tsarnaev is found guilty in federal court of a capital crime?

Last Answer : answer:I am opposed to the death penalty. Not because I think it is immoral. I think it is too quick of a punishment. Life in prison is much worse. So no, I will not change my position on the death penalty.

How do you feel about, a federal court of appeals recently threw out a jury verdict in favor of a father, Albert Snyder, who had sued protesters at his son Matthew's funeral for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Description : How do you feel about, a federal court of appeals recently threw out a jury verdict in favor of a father, Albert Snyder, who had sued protesters at his son Matthew's funeral for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Last Answer : I think it’s terrible. Those people should’ve been kept away from that funeral

Which scenario describes the federal court going against the principle of precedent?

Description : Which scenario describes the federal court going against the principle of precedent?

Last Answer : A federal judge rules that newspapers may be censored during an emergency despite earlier courts declaring this practice unconstitutional. -Apex

When Congress doesn't approve a president's choice for a federal court?

Description : When Congress doesn't approve a president's choice for a federal court?

Last Answer : Need answer

What Supreme Court appointed by the executive branch was a feature of which plan for the federal government president at the constitutional convention?

Description : What Supreme Court appointed by the executive branch was a feature of which plan for the federal government president at the constitutional convention?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

What two factors determine federal juristdiction if a case is heard in federal court?

Description : What two factors determine federal juristdiction if a case is heard in federal court?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer