The explicit provision of the statute of limitations of 1908 is that if a case , appeal or petition is not submitted to the court within the time limit prescribed by this Act, the court will not accept it thereafter. As per the provisions of section 3 to section 25 of the statute of limitations, the general rules regarding the duration of submission of any kind of appeal or application have been mentioned with exceptions. Section 5 of this Act provides for exemption or delay waiver. Section 26 of the statute of limitations provides for the abolition of ownership of immovable property through forcible possession and the provisions relating to the time limit for acquisition of property by a forcible occupier. Apart from this, there is a provision in Sections 16 and 27 of this Act regarding the time limit for acquiring the right to exercise. Therefore, the court shall not make any conjecture or apology in respect of the time limit allowed by the statute of limitations in the interest of justice except in the provision of delay remission under section 5 of this Act. Therefore, the court does not have the jurisdiction to extend the time limit even if the claim expires, nor can it revive the petitioned claim or right in the court. The statute of limitations, therefore, refers to a self-contained law which helps in resolving all kinds of claims or conflicts of rights by law without giving them a chance to prolong the process indefinitely. Moreover, this law prevents fraudulent activities. There are 183 paragraphs in Schedule 1 of the 29th section of the statute of limitations of 1908. Therefore, since this statute contains all kinds of statutory rules, it is considered as a complete statutory law. Therefore, in the light of the above discussion, it can be said that the statute of limitations of 1906 is a self-contained law.