answer:The wiki article actually has a few decent examples. But for example: Person A: I think that we need tighter gun control laws, in order to prevent guns from falling into the hands of people who would use them to perpetrate crimes. Person B: But if you take away everyone’s legal guns, criminals will still get illegal guns and then no one will be able to defend themselves. In this example, Person B has taken Person A’s suggestion that “tighter gun control laws” would “prevent guns from falling into the hands of people who would use them to perpetrate crimes,” and replaced it with taking “away everyone’s legal guns.” They then provide an explanation for why the new argument would not be a favorable condition and assume that they are victorious. However, they have not addressed the actual argument being made by Person A, instead they have built a straw man and then defeated the straw man instead.