The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.

The system of judicial review originated in – (1) India (2) Gemany (3) Russia (4) U.S.A.
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(4) U.S.A. Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. It is an example of the separation of powers in a modern governmental system (where the judiciary is one of three branches of government). Is is one of the main characteristics of government in the Republic of the United States. In the United States, federal and state courts (at all levels, both appellate and trial) are able to review and declare the "constitutionality", or agreement with the Constitution (or lack there of) of legislation that is relevant to any case properly within their jurisdiction. In American legal language, "judicial review" refers primarily to the adjudication of constitutionality of statutes, especially by the Supreme Court of the United States.
by
selected by

Related questions

We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Description : We have a system of Judicial Review in (1) Indian only (2) U. K. only (3) U. S. A. only (4) Both in India and U. S. A.

Last Answer : (4) Both in India and U. S. A. Explanation: We have the system of Judicial Review in both states of India and U. S. A.

The system of Judicial Review exists in (1) India only (2) U.K. only (3) U.S.A. only (4) India and U.S.A.

Description : The system of Judicial Review exists in (1) India only (2) U.K. only (3) U.S.A. only (4) India and U.S.A.

Last Answer : (4) India and U.S.A. Explanation: The system of judicial review exists in India and U.S.A. Judicial review is the power of a court to review the constitutionality of a statute or treaty, or ... , a treaty, or the Constitution itself. In U.K. tribunal system is part of the administrative justice.

The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Description : The Indian parliamentary system is different from the British Parliamentary system in that India has? (1) Both a real and a nominal executive (2) A system of collective responsibility (3) Bicameral legislature (4) The system of judicial review

Last Answer : (4) The system of judicial review Explanation: The law that the British Parliament enacts, cannot be brought to the Judiciary for its review unlike the Indian Parliament, wherein the legislation that ... in case the courts declare it to be violating the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.

The ‘Due Process of Law’ is the characteristics of the judicial system of - (1) India (2) France (3) U.K. (4) U.S.A

Description : The ‘Due Process of Law’ is the characteristics of the judicial system of - (1) India (2) France (3) U.K. (4) U.S.A

Last Answer : (4) U.S.A Explanation: The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution cach contains a Due Process Clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the ... from arbitrary dental of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law.

The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are – (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty, territorial integrity and parliamentary system of government. (3) Judicial review and the federal system. (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Description : The basic features of the Indian Constitution which are not amendable under Article 368 are - (1) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system and judicial review. (2) Sovereignty ... 4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government.

Last Answer : (4) Sovereignty, territorial integrity, federal system, judicial review and parliamentary system of government. Explanation: The power of Parliament to legislate and amend provisions of the ... review; Independence of Judiciary; Harmony between Fundamental rights and Directive principles; etc.

The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Description : The Presidential system operates most successfully in the USA because of (1) A strong two party system (2) A well demarcated constitution (3) Judicial review (4) Minor contradictions in society

Last Answer : (4) Minor contradictions in society Explanation: The presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a President who serves as both head of state and head of government. It operates most successfully in the USA because of Minor Contradictions in society.

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (1) Indian Parliament is supreme. (2) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (3) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (4) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Last Answer : (1) Indian Parliament is supreme Explanation: Though the Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India, the legislation passed by parliament may be challenged in Supreme Court. The ... houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Description : If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain - (1) Valid (2) Invalid (3) Valid Subject to the judicial review (4) Valid Subject to the approval of the parliament

Last Answer : (1) Valid Explanation: If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court, the acts performed by President Incumbent before the date of such decision of court remain valid.

The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Description : The two provisions of the Constitution of India that most clearly express the power of Judicial review are: (1) Article 21 and Article 446 (2) Article 32 and Article 226 (3) Article 44 and Article 152 (4) Article 17 and Article 143

Last Answer : (2) Article 32 and Article 226 Explanation: Legislature, executive and judiciary under the Constitution are to exercise powers with checks and balances, but not in water-tight rigid mould. In India, on the basis of Articles 32 and 136, the Supreme Court can exercise the power of judicial review.

Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Description : Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is restricted by: (1) Powers of the President of India (2) Judicial Review (3) Powers of the Prime Minister of India (4) Leader of the opposition

Last Answer : (2) Judicial Review Explanation: Sovereignty of Indian parliament is restricted by judicial review. The concept also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so that it is not bound by written law (in some cases, even a constitution) or by precedent.

The concept of Constitution first originated in – (1) Switzerland (2) Britain (3) U.S.A. (4) Japan

Description : The concept of Constitution first originated in – (1) Switzerland (2) Britain (3) U.S.A. (4) Japan

Last Answer : (2) Britain Explanation: England is treated as the place where the constitutional concept germinated, though the ancient Greek and Roman Republics, too, had such a facility. In England, Henry Fs proclamation of ... , outlaw, exile or kill anyone at a whim there must be due process of law first.

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How is legislative excess of Parliament and State Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/Governor (2) No- confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: The legislative excess of parliament and state assemblies checked by judicial review of Supreme Court.

Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Description : Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on which of the following? (1) Rule of law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by law (4) Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by law Explanation: Judicial Review is based on procedure established by law.

What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Description : What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Last Answer : (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws Explanation: The Supreme Court has been given the power to decide whether a law passed by the Parliament or the State legislatures and the executive ... such a law or executive decision is found unconstitutional, then it can declare it as invalid.

Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Description : Judicial review in the Indian Constitution is based on : (1) Rule of Law (2) Due process of Law (3) Procedure established by Law (4) Precedents and Conventions

Last Answer : (3) Procedure established by Law Explanation: Judicial review is adopted in the Constitution of India from the Constitution of the United States of America. In the Indian constitution, judicial review ... the court to exercise the power. Normally, it works according to procedure established by law.

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Description : How are legislative excesses of Parliament and Assemblies checked? (1) Intervention from President/ Governor (2) No Confidence motions (3) Judicial review (4) General elections

Last Answer : (3) Judicial review Explanation: Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary. Specific courts with ... a modern governmental system (where the judiciary is one of three branches of government).

During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Description : During emergency, imposed under Art. 352, which of the following Constitutional provisions stands suspended? (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (2) Amendment Procedures (3) Fundamental Rights (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Fundamental Rights Explanation: National emergency under article 352 of the Indian Constitution is caused by war, external aggression or armed rebellion in the whole of India or a part of ... according to the original Constitution, It modifies the federal system of government to a unitary one.

Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Description : Which of the following is not a feature of the Indian Constitution? (1) Written constitution (2) Federalism (3) Sovereignty of Parliament (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (3) Sovereignty of Parliament Explanation: Sovereignty of Parliament is not a feature of Indian constitution. Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to interpret the constitution and law or order of the legislature and executive void.

What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Description : What makes the judiciary the guardian of the constitution? (1) Independence (2) Service conditions (3) Salary (4) Judicial Review

Last Answer : (4) Judicial Review Explanation: Because the Supreme Court is given the power to protect, safeguard and uphold the Constitution and empowered to declare a law null and void if it is found to be inconsistent with the Constitution.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism. Judicial review is a process under which executive and legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Description : Public Interest Litigation (PIL) may be linked with - (1) judicial review (2) judicial activism (3) judicial intervention (4) judicial sanctity

Last Answer : (2) judicial activism Explanation: Public Interest litigation (PIL) may be linked with judicial activism in India.

The growth of judicial power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies have taken place because - (1) The constitutions have given the judiciary more powers (2) Acceptance of the theory of separation of powers (3) The U. N. Directives (4) Protect Human Rights

Description : The growth of judicial power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies have taken place because - (1) The constitutions have given the judiciary more powers (2) Acceptance of the theory of separation of powers (3) The U. N. Directives (4) Protect Human Rights

Last Answer : (4) Protect Human Rights Explanation: The growth of Judicial Power over the last one hundred years in liberal democracies has taken place to protect Human rights.

Who was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatuiliah (2) A.M. Ahmedi (3) P.N. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Description : Who was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatuiliah (2) A.M. Ahmedi (3) P.N. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Last Answer : (3) P.N. Bhagwati Explanation: P.N. Bhagwati was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest Litigation was introduced in the Indian Judicial system.

Who was the Chief Justice of India when public Interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatullah (2) A.M. Ahmadi (3) PN. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Description : Who was the Chief Justice of India when public Interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system? (1) M. Hidayatullah (2) A.M. Ahmadi (3) PN. Bhagwati (4) A.S. Anand

Last Answer : (3) PN. Bhagwati Explanation: P.N. Bhagwati was the chief justice of India when public interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system. The concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is in ... of AMU (1994-1997). A.S. Anand - 29th Chief Justice of India (1998- 2001).

The concept of Sovereign Parliament originated in : (1) England (2) India (3) France (4) Japan

Description : The concept of Sovereign Parliament originated in : (1) England (2) India (3) France (4) Japan

Last Answer : (1) England Explanation: The concept of Parliamentary sovereignty holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so that it is not bound by written law ... cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change.

Why was quickly defeating France a key element of Gemany military strategy before world war 1?

Description : Why was quickly defeating France a key element of Gemany military strategy before world war 1?

Last Answer : Need answer

The concept of 'Right of service' originated in — (1) The United States of America (2) Switzerland (3) Great Britain (4) China

Description : The concept of 'Right of service' originated in — (1) The United States of America (2) Switzerland (3) Great Britain (4) China

Last Answer : (3) Great Britain Explanation: The concept of `Right of Service' originated in Great Britain.

The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in – (1) The United Kingdom (2) Australia (3) The United States (4) Canada

Description : The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in – (1) The United Kingdom (2) Australia (3) The United States (4) Canada

Last Answer : (3) The United States Explanation: The concept of public Interest litigation (PIL) originated in the USA.

What is the objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission? (1) Training of the judges (2) Reforms in legal system (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. (4) To examine the working period of the judges.

Description : What is the objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission? (1) Training of the judges (2) Reforms in legal system (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. (4) To examine the working period of the judges.

Last Answer : (3) Bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level. Explanation: The main objective advocated for appointment of the National Judicial Commission is bringing about transparency and impartiality in the appointment of judges of the highest level.

Which of the following is the inalienable attribute of the parliamentaiy system of government? (1) Flexibility of the Constitution (2) Fusion of Executive and Legislature (3) Judicial Supremacy (4) Parliamentary Sovereignty

Description : Which of the following is the inalienable attribute of the parliamentaiy system of government? (1) Flexibility of the Constitution (2) Fusion of Executive and Legislature (3) Judicial Supremacy (4) Parliamentary Sovereignty

Last Answer : (2) Fusion of Executive and Legislature Explanation: A parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state in which the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy ... to, the legislature (parliament). The executive and legislative branches are thus interconnected.

What is the basis of classification of governments as unitary and federal? (1) Relationship between legislature and executive (2) Relationship between executive and judiciary (3) Relationship between the Centre and States (4) Relationship between the legislature, executive and judicial wings of government

Description : What is the basis of classification of governments as unitary and federal? (1) Relationship between legislature and executive (2) Relationship between executive and judiciary (3) Relationship ... Centre and States (4) Relationship between the legislature, executive and judicial wings of government

Last Answer : (3) Relationship between the Centre and States Explanation: The basic principles of federalism are the distribution of powers between the Centre and the States.

The Bureaucracy performs – (1) only administrative functions (2) only judicial functions (3) only legislative functions (4) administrative as well as quasi-judicial and quasilegislative functions

Description : The Bureaucracy performs – (1) only administrative functions (2) only judicial functions (3) only legislative functions (4) administrative as well as quasi-judicial and quasilegislative functions

Last Answer : (4) administrative as well as quasi-judicial and quasilegislative functions Explanation: The primary function of bureaucracy is the execution and enforcement of the laws made by the legislature ... of the federal bureaucracy. Its major functions are executing laws, creating rules and adjudication.

The House of Lords in Great Britain is mainly retained because - (1) It is as important as the House of Commons (2) It plays an important role of checks and balances (3) It acts as a judicial court (4) It is maintained as an institution

Description : The House of Lords in Great Britain is mainly retained because - (1) It is as important as the House of Commons (2) It plays an important role of checks and balances (3) It acts as a judicial court (4) It is maintained as an institution

Last Answer : (4) It is maintained as an institution Explanation: It is observed That British people are very conservative and have great regard for their historical institutions. Therefore, they continue to support historical institutions like Crown and House of Lords.

Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten years as an Advocate of a High Court (3) In the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Description : Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten ... the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Last Answer : (4) At least twenty years as a SubJudicial Magistrate Explanation: Eligibility of a judge of the Supreme Court a judge of one high court or more (continuously), for at least five years, or. an ... opinion of the president, power conferred by clause (2) of article 124 of the Constitution of India.

Which one of the following is not the tool of good governance? (1) Right to information (2) Citizens' Charter (3) Social Auditing (4) Judicial Activism

Description : Which one of the following is not the tool of good governance? (1) Right to information (2) Citizens' Charter (3) Social Auditing (4) Judicial Activism

Last Answer : (4) Judicial Activism Explanation: Judicial activism refers to judicial rulings that are suspected of being based on personal opinion, rather than on existing law. The question of judicial activism is closely related to constitutional interpretation, statutory construction, and separation of powers.

Which among the following Union Territory has a Judicial Commissioner? (1) Pondicherry (2) Andaman & Nicobar Islands (3) Daman & Diu (4) Lakshadweep

Description : Which among the following Union Territory has a Judicial Commissioner? (1) Pondicherry (2) Andaman & Nicobar Islands (3) Daman & Diu (4) Lakshadweep

Last Answer : (3) Daman & Diu Explanation: Act no. 16 of 1964 is an act to declare the judicial commissioner's court for Goa, Daman and Diu [16th may, 1964].

A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

A proceeding under Article 226 in case of detention of a person is a – (1) Civil proceeding (2) Criminal proceeding (3) Judicial proceeding (4) Statutory proceeding

Description : A proceeding under Article 226 in case of detention of a person is a – (1) Civil proceeding (2) Criminal proceeding (3) Judicial proceeding (4) Statutory proceeding

Last Answer : (2) Criminal proceeding Explanation: Under the writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court intervenes and asks the authority to provide the reasons for such detention. All proceedings under Article 226 are ... asks for any other writ than the Habeas Corpus, the proceedings are necessarily civil proceedings.

What is the main difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of state policy? (1) Constitutional Protection (2) Political Protection (3) Judicial Protection (4) Moral Protection

Description : What is the main difference between Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of state policy? (1) Constitutional Protection (2) Political Protection (3) Judicial Protection (4) Moral Protection

Last Answer : (3) Judicial Protection Explanation: Fundamental rights are enforceable rights which means on violation of these rights you can move to court of law but directive principles are not enforceable which means on violation of these you can't move to court law.

Judicial Review’s Doctrine of Partial Annulment is related to which article of the Constitution? (1) Article 13 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 141 (4) Article 246

Description : Judicial Review’s Doctrine of Partial Annulment is related to which article of the Constitution? (1) Article 13 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 141 (4) Article 246

Last Answer : (1) Article 13 Explanation: Article 13 of the Indian Constitution deals with the Judicial review.

Judicial review in India is governed by the principle a) Due process of Law b) Procedure established by Law c) By Law d) None of the above

Description : Judicial review in India is governed by the principle a) Due process of Law b) Procedure established by Law c) By Law d) None of the above

Last Answer : b) Procedure established by Law

Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.

Description : Which one of the following statements is not correct? (A) Indian Parliament is supreme. (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review. (C) There is a division of powers between the Centre and the States. (D) There is a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President. 

Last Answer : (B) The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review.

Awlaki and the CIA Hit List -- Should US Presidents have the right to target US Citizens for assassination without any judicial review?

Description : Awlaki and the CIA Hit List -- Should US Presidents have the right to target US Citizens for assassination without any judicial review?

Last Answer : No.

What do you understand by the term ‘Judicial Review’? -SST 10th

Description : What do you understand by the term ‘Judicial Review’? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Judicial Review means that the Supreme Court can reject the laws passed by the Legislature and the orders issued by the Executive and declare them void, if they are not in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

What is meant by Judicial Review and Original Jurisdiction? -SST 10th

Description : What is meant by Judicial Review and Original Jurisdiction? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Judicial Review refers to the power of the Supreme Court to declare null and void those laws of the legislature and those orders of the executive which go against the provisions of ... Also, in cases involving the violation of Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction.

Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Description : Judicial Review is one of the major role played by judiciary.'Support the statement. -Civics 9th

Last Answer : The judicial review refers to the power of judiciary to declare invalid any law of the legislature or the actions of the executive, whether at the Union level or at the state level, if they ... Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of the country and have the power of judicial review.

What does the power of judicial review ensure? -Do You Know?

Description : What does the power of judicial review ensure? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer: