Which part of a supreme court decisions presents the argument in favor of the courts ruling?

Which part of a supreme court decisions presents the argument in favor of the courts ruling?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

majority opinion. -apex
by

Related questions

Which is the highest judicial authority in India whose decisions are binding on all courts? (a) Supreme Court (b) Parliament (c) Law Minister (d) Lok Sabha

Description : Which is the highest judicial authority in India whose decisions are binding on all courts? (a) Supreme Court (b) Parliament (c) Law Minister (d) Lok Sabha

Last Answer : (a) Supreme Court

What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford?

Description : What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford?

Last Answer : That Scott had no right to argue in court

Do you agree with the Supreme Court ruling that upheld a school policy that the students weren't allowed to wear T-shirts displaying the American flag, and other such paraphernalia, to school on Cinco de Mayo?

Description : Do you agree with the Supreme Court ruling that upheld a school policy that the students weren't allowed to wear T-shirts displaying the American flag, and other such paraphernalia, to school on Cinco de Mayo?

Last Answer : answer:The case isn't that unusual to me. The Supreme Court has consistently maintained the stance that K-12 students do not have freedom of speech while on campus, as outlined in some of the ... came to free speech, but I can't really fault the school for trying to handle this situation.

Can the Supreme Court upheld or overturned the previous ruling?

Description : Can the Supreme Court upheld or overturned the previous ruling?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Description : When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Last Answer : Need answer

Which supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the United States?

Description : Which supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the United States?

Last Answer : The Dred Scott decision

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

In the brown ruling, the Supreme Court required public schools to desegregate?

Description : In the brown ruling, the Supreme Court required public schools to desegregate?

Last Answer : This decision actually declared that states' practices where separate schools be used to educate white children and black children was unconstitutional. It overturned an 1896 decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, which allowed segregation in public schools to be sponsored by individual states.

How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

_______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan(b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Description : _______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan (b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Last Answer : (b) India

Mention any one power of the Supreme Court, which is not enjoyed by other courts. -SST 10th

Description : Mention any one power of the Supreme Court, which is not enjoyed by other courts. -SST 10th

Last Answer : One power of the Supreme Court, which is not enjoyed by other Courts, is that only Supreme Court has the right to revise its earlier decisions.

What is the relationship of all the High Courts with the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Description : What is the relationship of all the High Courts with the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : All the High Courts are directly under the Supreme Court, since all of them are a part of a single Judiciary.

Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Description : Which amendment curtailed the power of Judicial review of the Supreme Court and the High Courts? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Description : In Indian Constitution the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas corpus' is vested only in- (1) The Supreme Court (2) The High Court (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court (4) Lower Courts

Last Answer : (3) The Supreme Court and the High Court Explanation: In Indian constitution, the power to issue a writ of 'Habeas Corpus' is vested only in the Supreme Court and the High Court. A writ ... or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Both the Supreme Court (Article 139) and the High Courts (Article 226) are empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, ... enforcement of the Fundamental Rights, the high courts can issue writs for other purposes as well.

Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Description : Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Last Answer : (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Indian Constitution has adopted 5 Prerogative writs. Article 13 clearly states that Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights ... to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights against any authority of the State.

Which of the following is not the essential qualification for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India? (1) Should be a citizen of India (2) Should be at least 35 years of age (3) Should have practised for at least 10 years as an advocate in one or more High Courts (4) Should be an eminent jurist

Description : Which of the following is not the essential qualification for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India? (1) Should be a citizen of India (2) Should be at least 35 years of age (3) Should ... for at least 10 years as an advocate in one or more High Courts (4) Should be an eminent jurist

Last Answer : (2) Should be at least 35 years of age Explanation: The Constitution of India mentions certain conditions for a person to be eligible for being a judge of the Supreme Court of India. In order to be ... for at least 10 years or he must be, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.

The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Description : The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Last Answer : (2) Inter-State disputes Explanation: The Supreme Court. has exclusive original jurisdiction over any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any ... of a legal right depend. In this capacity, it serves as the federal court of India.

Which of the following courts in India is/are known as the courts of Records? (1) The High Court only (2) The Supreme Court only (3) The High Court and Supreme Court (4) The District Court

Description : Which of the following courts in India is/are known as the courts of Records? (1) The High Court only (2) The Supreme Court only (3) The High Court and Supreme Court (4) The District Court

Last Answer : (3) The High Court and Supreme Court Explanation: A court of record is a court whose acts and proceedings are enrolled for perpetual memory and testimony. These records are used with a high authority and ... court of record". Article 215 empowers the High Courts of the states to be courts of record.

The power to decide an Election Petition for the State is vested in the – (1) Parliament (2) Supreme Court (3) High Courts (4) Election Commission

Description : The power to decide an Election Petition for the State is vested in the – (1) Parliament (2) Supreme Court (3) High Courts (4) Election Commission

Last Answer : (3) High Courts Explanation: Section 80-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that the High Court shall be the authority for presentment of election petitions under Article 329(2) of the Constitution. This was incorporated by an amendment in the year 1966 (Act 47 of 1966).

Subordinate courts are supervised by _______. (1) Supreme Court (2) District Court (3) High Court (4) Parliament

Description : Subordinate courts are supervised by _______. (1) Supreme Court (2) District Court (3) High Court (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) High Court Explanation: The system of appointment of judges, their qualifications and the working of subordinate courts is under the direct control and supervision of the High Court of ... being mainly courts of appeal, hear appeals from numerous subordinate courts working at district level.

Writs are issued by – (1) Supreme Court. (2) High Courts (3) The President (4) Supreme Court and High Courts

Description : Writs are issued by – (1) Supreme Court. (2) High Courts (3) The President (4) Supreme Court and High Courts

Last Answer : (4) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Five writs - Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari - are issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts.

Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any of the high courts (4) All of the above

Description : Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any of the high courts (4) All of the above

Last Answer : (2) President Explanation: President has the right to seek advisory opinion of the supreme court of India.

Who among the following is/are not appointed by the President of India? (A) Governors of the States (B) Chief Justice and Judges of the High Courts (C) Vice-President (D) Chief Justice and Judges of the Supreme Court

Description : Who among the following is/are not appointed by the President of India? (A) Governors of the States (B) Chief Justice and Judges of the High Courts (C) Vice-President (D) Chief Justice and Judges of the Supreme Court

Last Answer : (C) Vice-President

Who among the following is/are not appointed by the President of India? (A) Governors of the States (B) Chief Justice and Judges of the High Courts (C) Vice-President (D) Chief Justice and Judges of the Supreme Court

Description : Who among the following is/are not appointed by the President of India? (A) Governors of the States (B) Chief Justice and Judges of the High Courts (C) Vice-President (D) Chief Justice and Judges of the Supreme Court

Last Answer : (C) Vice-President

Which of the following can be done under conditions of financial emergency? 1. State Legislative Assemblies can be abolished. 2. Central Government can acquire control over the budget and expenditure of States. 3. Salaries of the Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court can be reduced. 4. Right to Constitutional Remedies can be suspended. Select the correct answer from the codes given below: Codes: (A) 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1 and 2 (D) 2 and 3

Description : Which of the following can be done under conditions of financial emergency? 1. State Legislative Assemblies can be abolished. 2. Central Government can acquire control over the budget and expenditure of States. 3. Salaries of the Judges of ... 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1 and 2 (D) 2 and 3

Last Answer : (D) 2 and 3

During the 1870s, Supreme Court decisions?

Description : During the 1870s, Supreme Court decisions?

Last Answer : guaranteed African Americans protection from actions by other citizens

What effect did the Dred Scott Decisions by the Supreme Court have on slavery int the territories as well as on slaves themselves?

Description : What effect did the Dred Scott Decisions by the Supreme Court have on slavery int the territories as well as on slaves themselves?

Last Answer : You need to do this question.We don't do homework and yourteacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how wellyou understood the lesson.

How did supreme court decisions under chief justice john marsall affect?

Description : How did supreme court decisions under chief justice john marsall affect?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

Consider the statement which is followed by two arguments (I) and (II): Statement: Should persons with criminal background be banned from contesting elections? Arguments: (I) Yes, it will decriminalize politics. (II) No, it will encourage the ruling party to file frivolous cases against their political opponents. (A) Only argument (I) is strong. (B) Only argument (II) is strong. (C) Both the arguments are strong. (D) Neither of the arguments is strong.

Description : Consider the statement which is followed by two arguments (I) and (II): Statement: Should persons with criminal background be banned from contesting elections? Arguments: (I) Yes, it will decriminalize ... strong. (C) Both the arguments are strong. (D) Neither of the arguments is strong.

Last Answer : (A) Only argument (I) is strong. 

Do you find it interesting that young earth creationists actually make an argument in favor of evolution by espousing one of their favorite arguments against evolution?

Description : Do you find it interesting that young earth creationists actually make an argument in favor of evolution by espousing one of their favorite arguments against evolution?

Last Answer : They of course are ducking the point, and it’s a cute trick when used on the vulnerable.. It’s like saying “We didn’t evolve from our cousins”. It’s a way of avoiding the truth of the accepted scientific doctrine that we and our cousins have the SAME ancestor who was neither man nor monkey.

Argument in favor of friction is a necessary nuisance ?

Description : Argument in favor of friction is a necessary nuisance ?

Last Answer : There is nothing we can do without friction. If there were no friction, the motion of the object would not have stopped , it would have continued non-stop. A nail is fixed to the wall because ... parachute. So while friction is considered a nuisance in many areas of our daily lives, it is essential.

What happened to Texas in 1845 Give one argument against and one argument in favor of this decision.?

Description : What happened to Texas in 1845 Give one argument against and one argument in favor of this decision.?

Last Answer : Need answer

What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Last Answer : c) Argument from authority

What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Description : What kind of argument is the following: "Four out of five dentists who recommend chewing gum, favor Trident sugarless gum." a) Argument from example b) Circular reasoning c) Argument from authority d) Logical argument

Last Answer : c) Argument from authority

which of the following was true of the supreme court’s rulings concerning progressive legislation? -General Knowledge

Description : which of the following was true of the supreme court’s rulings concerning progressive legislation? -General Knowledge

Last Answer : The court often sided with business by declaring laws unconstitutional was true of the Supreme Court rulings concerning Progressive legislation.

the supreme court's ability to interpret the constitution is called -General Knowledge

Description : the supreme court's ability to interpret the constitution is called -General Knowledge

Last Answer : The Supreme Court's ability to interpret the Constitution is called Judicial Review.

How did the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson differ from its later decision in Brown v. Board of Education?

Description : How did the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson differ from its later decision in Brown v. Board of Education?

Last Answer : While the Plessy decisions established the doctrine of "separate but equal" the Brown decision stated that separate was always unequal

Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court’s decision in Engel V Vitale?

Description : Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court’s decision in Engel V Vitale?

Last Answer : People should not have restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school. (just took the quiz)

Which statement would most likely be made by a supporter of the Supreme court's decision in engel v. Vitale?

Description : Which statement would most likely be made by a supporter of the Supreme court's decision in engel v. Vitale?

Last Answer : religious activity in public schools in a dangerous violation ofthe separation of church and state

how did the supreme courts decision in shenck v. united states affect free speech?

Description : how did the supreme courts decision in shenck v. united states affect free speech?

Last Answer : it limited it by saying that opposition to the draft was a danger to the country during wartime.

How did the Supreme Court's interpretation of the equal protection clause differ in the Plessy Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education rulings?

Description : How did the Supreme Court's interpretation of the equal protection clause differ in the Plessy Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education rulings?

Last Answer : in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause allowedracial segregation; in the brown, it ruled that clause did notallow segregation

Which of the following is not included in the authority given to the supreme courts?

Description : Which of the following is not included in the authority given to the supreme courts?

Last Answer : Veto or approve legislation

The Supreme Courts of India enjoys - (1) Original jurisdiction (2) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction (3) Advisory jurisdiction (4) Appellate and advisory jurisdiction

Description : The Supreme Courts of India enjoys - (1) Original jurisdiction (2) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction (3) Advisory jurisdiction (4) Appellate and advisory jurisdiction

Last Answer : (2) Original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction Explanation: The supreme court of India enjoys original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction.

Consider the statement which is followed by two arguments (i) and (ii). Statement: India should have a very strong and powerful Lokpal. Arguments: (i) Yes, it will go a long in eliminating corruption in bureaucracy. (ii) No, it will discourage honest officers from making quick decisions. Codes: (A) Only argument (i) is strong. (B) Only argument (ii) is strong. (C) Both the arguments are strong. (D) Neither of the arguments is strong.

Description : Consider the statement which is followed by two arguments (i) and (ii). Statement: India should have a very strong and powerful Lokpal. Arguments: (i) Yes, it will go a long in eliminating corruption in ... . (C) Both the arguments are strong. (D) Neither of the arguments is strong.

Last Answer : (A) Only argument (i) is strong. 

What do you think of this recent court ruling?

Description : What do you think of this recent court ruling?

Last Answer : answer:The best case might be that the judge was sending the message that, in the future, cops should be charged with murder, not manslaughter. In the past, in similar circumstances, prosecutors have given cops lighter charges than average people.

Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Description : Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Last Answer : Need answer