In the brown ruling, the Supreme Court required public schools to desegregate?

1 Answer

Answer :

This decision actually declared that states' practices where separate schools be used to educate white children and black children was unconstitutional. It overturned an 1896 decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, which allowed segregation in public schools to be sponsored by individual states.

Related questions

Description : Is there still busing in America to desegregate schools?

Last Answer : Desegregation Busing in the United States

Description : During the effort to desegregate schools in Little Rock Eisenhower places the Arkansas national guard under army command?

Last Answer : so that the guard would follow its commanders and prevent violence

Description : THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Last Answer : Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want

Description : Do you agree with the Supreme Court ruling that upheld a school policy that the students weren't allowed to wear T-shirts displaying the American flag, and other such paraphernalia, to school on Cinco de Mayo?

Last Answer : answer:The case isn't that unusual to me. The Supreme Court has consistently maintained the stance that K-12 students do not have freedom of speech while on campus, as outlined in some of the ... came to free speech, but I can't really fault the school for trying to handle this situation.

Description : Can the Supreme Court upheld or overturned the previous ruling?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

Description : When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Last Answer : Need answer

Description : Which part of a supreme court decisions presents the argument in favor of the courts ruling?

Last Answer : majority opinion. -apex

Description : Which supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the United States?

Last Answer : The Dred Scott decision

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

Description : _______ Country Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling allowing “passive euthanasia”: (a) Pakistan (b) India (c) Saudi Arabia (d) None of These

Last Answer : (b) India

Description : Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

Description : Why were some schools still segregated in 1960 even though the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation was unconstitutional in 1954?

Last Answer : Reginald F. Lewis (December 7, 1942 - January 19, 1993), was an American businessman. He was one of the richest African-American men in the 1980s, and the first African American to build a ... In 1993, Forbes listed Lewis among the 400 richest Americans, with a net worth estimated at $400 million.

Description : What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford?

Last Answer : That Scott had no right to argue in court

Description : The Supreme Court decision in brown v. Board of education overturned its earlier decision in?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson.

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

Description : a major newspaper runs an editorial declaring that the U.S. Senate should confirm a new Supreme Court Justice. What method of shaping public opinion does this represent?

Last Answer : Direct argument

Description : A writ of Mandamus can be issued by the Supreme Court to – (1) an official to perform public duty (2) the Prime Minister to dissolve the Cabinet (3) the company to raise wages (4) the Government to pay the salaries to employees

Last Answer : (1) an official to perform public duty Explanation: The term "mandamus" literally means "command." Writ of mandamus is issued to a person or lower level Court or a body by a superior Court. ... a particular act. The writ of mandamus is an effective writ that checks the functioning of the government.

Description : Which among the following Writs comes into the category of public litigation petition before High Court or Supreme Court? (1) a challenge to elections of the office-bearers of a political party (2) against political interference (3) against the decision of Lower Court (4) against a general topic

Last Answer : (4) against a general topic Explanation: Although the proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or orders made by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of ... India only and perhaps no other Court in the world has been exercising this extraordinary jurisdiction.

Description : Who decides the office of profit? (1) President and Governor (2) Union Parliament (3) Supreme Court (4) Union Public Service Commission

Last Answer : (1) President and Governor Explanation: Under article 102 mentioned the decision of the president shall be final. President and Governor decides the office of profit.

Description : A member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the – (1) President (2) Prime Minister (3) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (4) Chairman of the UPSC

Last Answer : (1) President Explanation: A member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed from office only by an order of the President on the ground of misbehaviour. The President is empowered ... any way participate in its profit or benefits except as an ordinary member of an incorporated company.

Description : The annual report of the UPSC is submitted to – (1) The President (2) The Supreme Court (3) The Prime Minister (4) The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission

Last Answer : (1) The President Explanation: The UPSC annually submits a report of its work to the President of India. Further it is sent to each house of Parliament for discussion.

Description : What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Last Answer : (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest Explanation: Public Interest Litigation, or PIL, is defined as the use of litigation, or legal action, which seeks to advance the cause ... who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court.

Description : Members of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed by the- (1) Parliament after a resolution adopted with 2/3rds majority (2) President on a unani-mous recommendation from ... an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court (4) President on recommendation from Central Administrative Tribunal

Last Answer : (3) President on the basis of an inquiry and report by the Supreme Court Explanation: Every member holds office for a term of six years or until he attains the age of sixty-five years, whichever ... in the opinion of the President unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of mind or body.

Description : The first High/Supreme Court judge, who voluntarily made his assets public is - (1) Justice D.V.S. Kumar (2) Justice K. Chandra (3) Justice K. Kannan (4) Justice V.C. Srivastava

Last Answer : (3) Justice K. Kannan Explanation: High court judge Justice K Kannan was the first judge to have voluntarily made his assets public.

Description : A writ issued by the Supreme Court compelling a quasi-judicial/public authority to petiomi its manciatoly dusty is – (1) Quo warrant (2) Mandamus (3) Certiorari (4) Prohibition

Last Answer : (3) Certiorari Explanation: Equality before the law, also known as legal equality, is the principle under which all people are subject to the same laws of justice (due prodess). Article 14 of Indian ... has to face trial in the same law courts, irrespective of his status or position in the society.

Description : A monopolistic trade practice is deemed to be prejudicial to public interest except when A. Authorized by Central Government B. Authorized by State Government C. Authorized by Supreme Court D. None of the above

Last Answer : B. Authorized by State Government

Description : Which one of the following criteria is not required to be qualified for appointment as Judge of the Supreme Court? (1) At least five years as a Judge of a High Court (2) At least ten ... the opinion of the President, a distinguished Jurist (4) At least twenty years as a Sub Judicial Magistrate

Last Answer : (4) At least twenty years as a SubJudicial Magistrate Explanation: Eligibility of a judge of the Supreme Court a judge of one high court or more (continuously), for at least five years, or. an ... opinion of the president, power conferred by clause (2) of article 124 of the Constitution of India.

Description : The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Last Answer : (4) five Explanation: Minimum five Judges of the Supreme Court are required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference to it.

Description : What do you think of this recent court ruling?

Last Answer : answer:The best case might be that the judge was sending the message that, in the future, cops should be charged with murder, not manslaughter. In the past, in similar circumstances, prosecutors have given cops lighter charges than average people.

Description : Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Description : Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Last Answer : Yes! Great idea. @ragingloli

Description : Do you think given the opportunity Democrats would steal a Supreme Court seat similar to what McConnell did with Garland?

Last Answer : Seems like they’ve let the Republicans deny them one way or another, several times in a row now, no?

Description : So now we have two sexual abusers on the Supreme Court and one in the White House. How will you celebrate?

Last Answer : Hmmm…let me think…what did we do when Bill Clinton was elected? We should do that again.

Description : People who have favored Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court Justice, how do you feel about this article?

Last Answer : The author finds her account more believable than his. But there is no corroboration. No evidence. When even her best friend said she has no memory of this gathering and has never met ... against Kavanaugh. The Atlantic has been running a LOT of anti-Kavanaugh pieces and live interviews lately.

Description : Justice Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court. Should Trump be allowed to nominate another judge, since this is probably his last year in office?

Last Answer : Yes, Trump will nominate another judge. Kennedy's decision to step down could transform the Supreme Court for generations. Trump will have his second opportunity to nominate a justice and will likely ... foreseeable future. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/27/politics/anthony-kennedy-retires/index.html

Description : Can you imagine Clarence Thomas being appointed to the Supreme Court today?

Last Answer : Can you imagine Roy Moore being elected to the Senate next month?

Description : Should Gorsuch's plagiarism be considered grounds for his disqualification as a Supreme Court candidate?

Last Answer : He’ll fit right in with the rest of King Trump’s troops.

Description : Does anyone else think that If Clinton wins the election, and the Dems overturn GOP Congressional majorities, Obama will be appointed to the Supreme Court?

Last Answer : answer:No. He’s a politician, not a jurist. Granted, he taught constitutional law, but he has no experience on the bench. It will never happen.

Description : Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Last Answer : answer:Criminally negligent? No. Child endangerment? Yes. These “parents” (and I use the term only in its biological sense) should lose parental rights. All they have done is raised 9 children who will be incapable of crossing a street, let alone take care of them selves or hold a job.

Description : What do you think about Merrick Garland being nominated to the Supreme Court?

Last Answer : 1) He’s Jewish 2) He seems reasonable 3) Yes, if Clinton wins in November. But not before.

Description : Aren't Republicans taking one hell of a chance in stalling the selection of a Supreme Court Justice?

Last Answer : Right now I doubt even the Republicans know what they are doing, their only goal is to stall,block and bitch about anything the Democrats say or do.

Description : Will Srikanth Srinivasan be the next Supreme Court appointee?

Last Answer : In 2013 USA Today thought he would possibly become a Supreme Court Justice. We will see shortly.

Description : How did the story about a face covering end up in the Supreme Court?

Last Answer : I’m curious too, since that article said nothing about the Supreme Court.

Description : Has the recent Supreme Court decision on unlimited campaign financing dealt the final death blow to USA democracy?

Last Answer : It’s time for a revolution.

Description : Did you hear that the US Supreme Court ruled against being able to patent genes?

Last Answer : I had not heard until now – but this is great news!

Description : Is the 2012 election going to wind up in the Supreme Court?

Last Answer : No. The nation learned from Bush/Gore. This may be stinky but no. Neither candidate would stoop so low as the Bushes did. That was the nadir of the American political process. http://www.anartist.com/imagesNonSite/b-g2sc.jpg http://www.anartist.com/imagesNonSite/b-g1sc.jpg

Description : If it was your call, what Supreme Court Justice/s would you replace?

Last Answer : Roberts Scalia Alito Kennedy and Thomas