Which cases does the district level court deal with ? -SST 10th

Which cases does the district level court deal with ? -SST 10th
by

1 Answer

Answer :

The district level court deals with cases involving claims up to Rs 20 lakhs.
by

Related questions

Which is the highest Court of Justice for civil cases at the District level? -SST 10th

Description : Which is the highest Court of Justice for civil cases at the District level? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Civil Court—Court of District Judge.

Which kind of cases does the Tehsildar’s Court deal with? -SST 10th

Description : Which kind of cases does the Tehsildar’s Court deal with? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Tehsildar’s Court deals with the cases relating to the assessment of land revenue and property tax.

What does the consumer do if his case is dismissed in a district level court? -SST 10th

Description : What does the consumer do if his case is dismissed in a district level court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : He can appeal in state and then in national level courts.

What is the designation of a District Judge when he deals with criminal cases? -SST 10th

Description : What is the designation of a District Judge when he deals with criminal cases? -SST 10th

Last Answer : When a District Judge deals with criminal cases he is called a Sessions Judge.

The High Court is the highest court at the a) State level b) District level c) National level d) None of the above

Description : The High Court is the highest court at the a) State level b) District level c) National level d) None of the above

Last Answer : a) State level

Mention three cases in which the High Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction. -SST 10th

Description : Mention three cases in which the High Court enjoys Original Jurisdiction. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Original Jurisdiction extends to those cases which High Court has authority to hear and decide in the first instance. (i) The cases regarding wills, divorce, marriage Admiralty, Company Law and ... has the power to interpret the Constitution. This is known as the power of Judicial Review.

Which kind of cases does a Commissioner’s Court take up? -SST 10th

Description : Which kind of cases does a Commissioner’s Court take up? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Commissioner’s Court takes up the cases relating to assessment and collection of revenue.

Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Description : Explain the different categories of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of Criminal Court. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Criminal Courts: From 31st March, 1973, a new Criminal Procedure Act came into effect. Criminal Courts deal with criminal cases. These courts are divided into four categories: The Session Courts: The Session ... rioting. He can award imprisonment for not more than one month and a fine upto Rs. 50.

Under which jurisdiction can a High Court accept an appeal against the decision of the district court? -SST 10th

Description : Under which jurisdiction can a High Court accept an appeal against the decision of the district court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : Under Appellate Judgement (both civil and criminal) the High Courts can accept appeals against the decisions of the lower courts. In civil cases the High Courts hear the appeals against the decisions of ... also lie to the High Court, when the order of acquittal is passed by a Sessions judge.

Name the highest Criminal Court in a District. -SST 10th

Description : Name the highest Criminal Court in a District. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Sessions Court.

Which is the highest Revenue Court in a District? -SST 10th

Description : Which is the highest Revenue Court in a District? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The highest Revenue Court in a District is the Board of Revenue.

Do you think former jurors on big court cases should be prevented from selling their stories for a profit?

Description : Do you think former jurors on big court cases should be prevented from selling their stories for a profit?

Last Answer : answer:How would you prevent it? and why? I guess as a general rule I don’t think things should be regulated unless there’s someone who is harmed by it directly. If someone will pay for their point of view and opinions, it’s completely theirs to give.

What are the court cases that highlight the republican party's distribution of misleading election materials to minority and immigrant neighborhoods in NJ?

Description : What are the court cases that highlight the republican party's distribution of misleading election materials to minority and immigrant neighborhoods in NJ?

Last Answer : And folks wonder why I sometimes bash NJ politics/politicians.

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding which cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Description : Which factor does the Supreme Court generally considered especially important when deciding the cases to review?

Last Answer : Whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

What are the most common cases seen in family court?

Description : What are the most common cases seen in family court?

Last Answer : According to my opinion, the most common cases seen in family courts revolve around domestic violence, divorce issues, child custody, child visitation issues, child abuse or child support issues, spousal support and adoption.

When are cases heard by supreme court?

Description : When are cases heard by supreme court?

Last Answer : The Supreme Court is the court of last resort. When all appealsand lower courts have heard and ruled on a case it may go to theSupreme Court, but the court doesn’t have to hear it and may letthe lower ruling stand or kick it back to the lower federalcourt.

What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Description : What Understanding the idea of the Constitution as a living document which pair of Supreme Court cases below is the best example of governmental interpretation changing on a single issue?

Last Answer : Need answer

How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?

Description : How the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law were extended by landmark court cases?

Last Answer : how the powers of the Supreme Court and federal law wereextended by landmark court cases

Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Description : Who hands down ruling on court cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Description : Is a body of law based on custom tradition and precedent set in past court cases?

Last Answer : common law

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Description : How did the Supreme Court decision in the slaughter house cases affect American business?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?

Description : What was the topic of most of the federal court cases between the civil war and world war ii?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Description : What is one reason the Supreme Court gave for its discussion in the 1883 discrimination cases?

Last Answer : Need answer

Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Description : Can state court cases be appealed beyond the state supreme court?

Last Answer : It depends on the circumstance.If the issue in question (the issue that caused the appeal) is an error regarding state law, then the state supreme court would be the final appeal.If ... these appeals are not automatically accepted. The appellate courts are certainly capable of rejecting the appeal.

How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Description : How many court cases does the Supreme Court handle each year?

Last Answer : The justices of the Supreme Court only take on the cases that they wish to hear. Typically no more than 100 cases are heard by the court each year.

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Description : Members of a company may apply to which one among the following for relief under the Companies Act, 1956 in cases of oppression ? (A) Central Government (B) High Court of Judicature (C) National Company Law Tribunal (D) National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Last Answer : Answer: National Company Law Tribunal

Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Description : Judicial Review signifies that the Supreme Court – (1) has final authority in overall cases (2) can declare a state law as unconstitutional (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court (4) None of the above

Last Answer : (3) can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court Explanation: Supreme Court can review cases whose decisions have been given by High Court.

In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Description : In the following cases, the Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award - (1) Inter state river water disputes (2) Delimitation of constitution (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)

Last Answer : (3) Both (1) and (b) Explanation: The Supreme Court has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to change the award in the case of interstate river water disputes and delimitation of constitution.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Description : The Supreme Court of India acts as a Federal Court when it deals with – (1) Civil cases (2) Inter-State disputes (3) Appeals from lower courts (4) Election petitions

Last Answer : (2) Inter-State disputes Explanation: The Supreme Court. has exclusive original jurisdiction over any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any ... of a legal right depend. In this capacity, it serves as the federal court of India.

In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the offender shall be punished for the offence a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all b) For which the highest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all c) Shall be reduced but subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of reduction d) None of the above

Description : In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several  offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is  guilty, the offender ... subject to the discretion of the court as to the quantum of  reduction d) None of the above

Last Answer : a) For which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all

Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 57 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice

Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Description : Section 56 of Indian evidence act- a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant d) All the above

Last Answer : b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved

Was Aaron Burr a lawyer of the Southern District of New York Federal Court?

Description : Was Aaron Burr a lawyer of the Southern District of New York Federal Court?

Last Answer : He was appointed New York AG the same year that the Federal district system was established. So you could make the argument.

According to the Constitution of India the term 'district judge' shall not include - (1) Chief Presidency Magistrate (2) Sessions Judge (3) Tribunal Judge (4) Chief Justice of a Small Cause Court

Description : According to the Constitution of India the term 'district judge' shall not include - (1) Chief Presidency Magistrate (2) Sessions Judge (3) Tribunal Judge (4) Chief Justice of a Small Cause Court

Last Answer : (3) Tribunal Judge Explanation: According to Article 236, the expression district judge includes judge of a city Civil Court, additional district judge, joint district judge, ... additional chief presidency magistrate, sessions judge, additional sessions judge and assistant sessions judge.

Which among the following court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha? (1) District Court of a constituency (2) High Court of the State (3) Special Judge authorised by the ChiefJustice of India (4) Supreme Court

Description : Which among the following court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha? (1) District Court of a constituency (2) High Court of the State (3) Special Judge authorised by the ChiefJustice of India (4) Supreme Court

Last Answer : (2) High Court of the State Explanation: The High Court has the original jurisdiction to hear petition and give decision challenging election of the Lok Sabha/ Vidhan Sabha.

A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Description : A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the ... of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Last Answer : (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State Explanation: A sitting judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State.

Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Description : Under the Constitution, the power to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus is vested in – (1) High Courts alone (2) Supreme Court alone (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts (4) All Courts down to the District Courts

Last Answer : (3) Both Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Indian Constitution has adopted 5 Prerogative writs. Article 13 clearly states that Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights ... to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights against any authority of the State.

Which of the following courts in India is/are known as the courts of Records? (1) The High Court only (2) The Supreme Court only (3) The High Court and Supreme Court (4) The District Court

Description : Which of the following courts in India is/are known as the courts of Records? (1) The High Court only (2) The Supreme Court only (3) The High Court and Supreme Court (4) The District Court

Last Answer : (3) The High Court and Supreme Court Explanation: A court of record is a court whose acts and proceedings are enrolled for perpetual memory and testimony. These records are used with a high authority and ... court of record". Article 215 empowers the High Courts of the states to be courts of record.

The Indian Constitution provides for the appointment of Adhoc judges in: (1) Supreme Court (2) High Court (3) District and Session Court (4) All of these

Description : The Indian Constitution provides for the appointment of Adhoc judges in: (1) Supreme Court (2) High Court (3) District and Session Court (4) All of these

Last Answer : (1) Supreme Court Explanation: The Indian Constitution provides for the appointment of Ad hoc judge in supreme court. A Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.

District Judge is under the control of – (1) State Government (2) High Court (3) Supreme Court (4) Governor

Description : District Judge is under the control of – (1) State Government (2) High Court (3) Supreme Court (4) Governor

Last Answer : (2) High Court Explanation: District judges administer justice in India at a district level. According to Article 235 of the Indian Constitution, they are under administrative control of the High Court of the State to which the district concerned belongs.

Judges of the district court are appointed by: (1) Governor (2) Chief Minister (3) Law Minister (4) President

Description : Judges of the district court are appointed by: (1) Governor (2) Chief Minister (3) Law Minister (4) President

Last Answer : (1) Governor Explanation: The judges of subordinate courts are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State. A minimum of seven years of practice as a lawyer at bar is a necessary qualification.

Subordinate courts are supervised by _______. (1) Supreme Court (2) District Court (3) High Court (4) Parliament

Description : Subordinate courts are supervised by _______. (1) Supreme Court (2) District Court (3) High Court (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) High Court Explanation: The system of appointment of judges, their qualifications and the working of subordinate courts is under the direct control and supervision of the High Court of ... being mainly courts of appeal, hear appeals from numerous subordinate courts working at district level.

Proclamation shall be issued by a) Supdt of Police b) District Commissioner c) Court concerned d) Any one of the above

Description : Proclamation shall be issued by a) Supdt of Police b) District Commissioner  c) Court concerned d) Any one of the above

Last Answer : c) Court concerned