The following argument: “ All mammals have wings. All reptiles are mammals. Therefore all reptiles have wings ”. A) Inductive B) invalid C) sound D) Valid.

The following argument:

 “ All mammals have wings.

 All reptiles are mammals. 

Therefore all reptiles have wings ”.

A) Inductive

 B) invalid

 C) sound

 D) Valid. 
by

1 Answer

Answer :

 D) Valid. 
by

Related questions

All Indians are hardworking All Keralites are Indians Therefore, All Keralites are hardworking The above argument is A) Invalid B) False C) Valid D) True

Description : All Indians are hardworking All Keralites are Indians Therefore, All Keralites are hardworking The above argument is A) Invalid B) False C) Valid D) True 

Last Answer : C) Valid 

A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is A) valid and all its premises are true B) invalid and all its premises are true C) is valid and one of the premise is false D) is valid and its conclusion is false.

Description : A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is A) valid and all its premises are true B) invalid and all its premises are true C) is valid and one of the premise is false D) is valid and its conclusion is false. 

Last Answer : A) valid and all its premises are true 

If it is possible for the premises of a deductive argument to be true and its conclusion to be false, that argument is A) Valid B) Invalid C) Indescribable D) Sound.

Description : If it is possible for the premises of a deductive argument to be true and its conclusion to be false, that argument is A) Valid B) Invalid C) Indescribable D) Sound.  

Last Answer : B) Invalid

Inductive arguments are properly characterised as A) valid-invalid B) strong-weak C) definite-indefinite D) certain-uncertain.

Description : Inductive arguments are properly characterised as A) valid-invalid B) strong-weak C) definite-indefinite D) certain-uncertain. 

Last Answer : B) strong-weak 

The following argument: Aristotle is human and mortal. Bacon is human and mortal. Castro is human and mortal. Descartes is human and mortal. Therefore all humans are mortal. is an example for --------- argument. A) Deductive B) Inductive C) Syllogistic D) Deduction-Induction combined.

Description : The following argument:  Aristotle is human and mortal.  Bacon is human and mortal.  Castro is human and mortal.  Descartes is human and mortal.  Therefore all humans are mortal.  is an example ... ---- argument. A) Deductive  B) Inductive C) Syllogistic D) Deduction-Induction combined. 

Last Answer : B) Inductive 

A valid deductive argument with true premises is called a ------ argument. A) sound B) unsound C) fallacious D) dilemma.

Description : A valid deductive argument with true premises is called a ------ argument. A) sound B) unsound C) fallacious D) dilemma.  

Last Answer : A) sound 

The falsehood of a valid deductive argument’s conclusion guarantees that A) the argument is sound B) atleast one of the premise is false C) premises are true D) the validity is uncertain.

Description : The falsehood of a valid deductive argument’s conclusion guarantees that A) the argument is sound B) atleast one of the premise is false C) premises are true D) the validity is uncertain. 

Last Answer : B) atleast one of the premise is false 

The claim of an inductive argument is that premises provide---------- for the conclusion. A) invalidity B) absolute evidence C) no evidence D) some evidence

Description : The claim of an inductive argument is that premises provide---------- for the conclusion. A) invalidity B) absolute evidence C) no evidence D) some evidence 

Last Answer : D) some evidence 

The premises provide conclusive grounds for the conclusion in ----------- argument. A) Inductive B) Deductive C) Fallacious D) Intuitive

Description : The premises provide conclusive grounds for the conclusion in ----------- argument. A) Inductive B) Deductive C) Fallacious D) Intuitive

Last Answer : B) Deductive

“All thugs are murderers Therefore all Indians are murderers”. The fallacy committed by above argument is A) Illicit minor B) Illicit major C) Ambiguous major D) Undistributed middle.

Description : “All thugs are murderers  Therefore all Indians are murderers”.  The fallacy committed by above argument is  A) Illicit minor  B) Illicit major  C) Ambiguous major  D) Undistributed middle. 

Last Answer : A) Illicit minor 

“All men are selfish No apes are men Therefore no apes are selfish”. The above argument commits the fallacy of A) Undistributed middle B) Illicit major C) Illicit minor D) Ambiguous minor

Description : “All men are selfish  No apes are men  Therefore no apes are selfish”.  The above argument commits the fallacy of  A) Undistributed middle  B) Illicit major  C) Illicit minor  D) Ambiguous minor

Last Answer : B) Illicit major

“All men are mortal Socrates is a man Therefore Socrates is mortal”. _________ is the middle term of the above argument. A) Mortal B) Socrates C) Men D) Is

Description : “All men are mortal  Socrates is a man  Therefore Socrates is mortal”.  _________ is the middle term of the above argument.  A) Mortal  B) Socrates  C) Men  D) Is 

Last Answer : C) Men

“All men are mortal All kings are men Therefore all kings are mortal”. __________ is the minor term of the above argument. A) Mortal B) Kings C) Men D) Are

Description : “All men are mortal  All kings are men  Therefore all kings are mortal”.  __________ is the minor term of the above argument.  A) Mortal  B) Kings  C) Men  D) Are

Last Answer :  B) Kings 

“He is either a saint or a sinner He is not a saint Therefore he is a sinner”. The above argument commits the fallacy of________. A) Undistributed middle B) Improper disjunction C) Four terms D) Illicit minor.

Description : “He is either a saint or a sinner  He is not a saint  Therefore he is a sinner”.  The above argument commits the fallacy of________.  A) Undistributed middle  B) Improper disjunction  C) Four terms  D) Illicit minor. 

Last Answer :  B) Improper disjunction

An advantage of inductive reasoning is A) to sustain existing beliefs B) to formulate valid arguments C) to create aesthetic sense D) to frame future expectations.

Description : An advantage of inductive reasoning is A) to sustain existing beliefs B) to formulate valid arguments C) to create aesthetic sense D) to frame future expectations.

Last Answer : D) to frame future expectations.

Which of the following statements are true? Choose from the codes given below. 1. Some arguments, while not completely valid, are almost valid. 2. A sound argument may be invalid. 3. A cogent argument may have a probably false conclusion. 4. A statement may be true or false. Codes: (A) 1 and 2 (B) 1, 3 and 4 (C) 4 alone (D) 3 and 4

Description : Which of the following statements are true? Choose from the codes given below. 1. Some arguments, while not completely valid, are almost valid. 2. A sound argument may be invalid. 3. A cogent argument may have a probably false ... Codes: (A) 1 and 2 (B) 1, 3 and 4 (C) 4 alone (D) 3 and 4

Last Answer : (D) 3 and 4

The proposition: “Socrates is wise”, is an example for ___________ proposition. A) negative B) singular C) emotive D) invalid.

Description : The proposition: “Socrates is wise”, is an example for ___________ proposition. A) negative B) singular C) emotive D) invalid.

Last Answer : B) singular 

A syllogism is form of mediate _________ inference. A) deductive B) inductive C) intuitive D) fallacious.

Description : A syllogism is form of mediate _________ inference. A) deductive B) inductive C) intuitive D) fallacious.

Last Answer : A) deductive

A syllogism is a form of ___________ inference. A) mediate B) immediate C) intuitive D) inductive.

Description : A syllogism is a form of ___________ inference. A) mediate B) immediate C) intuitive D) inductive.

Last Answer : A) mediate

Inductive logic is also known as A) Formal logic B) Model logic C) Material logic D) Sentential logic

Description : Inductive logic is also known as A) Formal logic B) Model logic C) Material logic D) Sentential logic 

Last Answer : C) Material logic 

A single ------ is enough to prove the inductive conclusion false. A) intuition B) Assumption C) counter-example D) concept.

Description : A single ------ is enough to prove the inductive conclusion false. A) intuition B) Assumption C) counter-example D) concept. 

Last Answer : C) counter-example

Inductive method is identified with A) Religious activity B) Scientific activity C) Moral activity D) Aesthetic activity.

Description : Inductive method is identified with A) Religious activity B) Scientific activity C) Moral activity D) Aesthetic activity. 

Last Answer : B) Scientific activity 

Discovering a new ------- is permissible in inductive reasoning. A) cause B) effect C) assumption D) evidence.

Description : Discovering a new ------- is permissible in inductive reasoning. A) cause B) effect C) assumption D) evidence. 

Last Answer :  D) evidence. 

In inductive reasoning the conclusion is -------. A) Probable B) Certain C) Definite D) Predictable.

Description : In inductive reasoning the conclusion is -------. A) Probable B) Certain C) Definite D) Predictable.

Last Answer : A) Probable 

“All animals are mortal All men are animals Therefore all men are mortal.” _________ is the major term of the above syllogism. A) Mortal B) Men C) Animals D) Are.

Description : “All animals are mortal  All men are animals  Therefore all men are mortal.”  _________ is the major term of the above syllogism.  A) Mortal  B) Men  C) Animals  D) Are. 

Last Answer : A) Mortal 

“ All donkeys are animals. All monkeys are animals. Therefore all monkeys are donkeys”. The fallacy committed by the above syllogism is A) Ambiguous major B) Ambiguous minor C) Ambiguous middle D) Undistributed middle.

Description : “ All donkeys are animals. All monkeys are animals. Therefore all monkeys are donkeys”. The fallacy committed by the above syllogism is A) Ambiguous major B) Ambiguous minor C) Ambiguous middle D) Undistributed middle.  

Last Answer : D) Undistributed middle. 

“ Food is indispensable to life. Plantain is a food. Therefore plantain is indispensable to life.” The fallacy committed by the above syllogism is A) Ambiguous major B) Ambiguous minor C) Ambiguous middle D) Undistributed middle.

Description : “ Food is indispensable to life. Plantain is a food. Therefore plantain is indispensable to life.” The fallacy committed by the above syllogism is A) Ambiguous major B) Ambiguous minor C) Ambiguous middle D) Undistributed middle. 

Last Answer : C) Ambiguous middle 

“B is a friend of C. A is a friend of B. Therefore A is a friend of C.” The above syllogism commits the fallacy of__________. A) quarterino-terminorum B) ambiguous major C) ambiguous minor D) equivocation.

Description : “B is a friend of C.  A is a friend of B.  Therefore A is a friend of C.”  The above syllogism commits the fallacy of__________.  A) quarterino-terminorum  B) ambiguous major   C) ambiguous minor  D) equivocation. 

Last Answer : A) quarterino-terminorum 

Both premises and conclusion of an argument are _______. A) Commands B) Propositions C) Exclamations D) Questions.

Description : Both premises and conclusion of an argument are _______. A) Commands B) Propositions C) Exclamations  D) Questions.  

Last Answer : B) Propositions 

Words and names can become terms only if they are used in---------. A) an argument B) proposition C) thought D) reasoning.

Description : Words and names can become terms only if they are used in---------. A) an argument B) proposition C) thought D) reasoning. 

Last Answer :  B) proposition 

The relationship between premises and conclusion in a deductive argument is--. A) Cause-Effect B) Analytic-Synthetic C) A priori-A posterior D) Implication-Entailment.

Description : The relationship between premises and conclusion in a deductive argument is--. A) Cause-Effect B) Analytic-Synthetic C) A priori-A posterior D) Implication-Entailment. 

Last Answer : D) Implication-Entailment. 

The verbal expression of reasoning is called---------. A) an argument B) a term C) a proposition D) a concept

Description : The verbal expression of reasoning is called---------. A) an argument B) a term C) a proposition D) a concept

Last Answer : A) an argument 

The verbal expression of a judgment is called ----------. A) Argument B) Term C) Proposition D) Reasoning

Description : The verbal expression of a judgment is called ----------. A) Argument B) Term C) Proposition D) Reasoning

Last Answer : C) Proposition 

The verbal expression of a concept is called a --------. A) Proposition B) Argument C) Judgment D) Term

Description : The verbal expression of a concept is called a --------. A) Proposition B) Argument C) Judgment D) Term

Last Answer : D) Term

Propositions which supports the conclusion of an argument are called A) Inferences B) Premises C) Terms D) Concepts.

Description : Propositions which supports the conclusion of an argument are called  A) Inferences B) Premises C) Terms D) Concepts.

Last Answer : B) Premises 

Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning: (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment (B) The conclusion should be supported by the premise/premises (C) The conclusion must follow from the premise/premises necessarily (D) The argument may be valid or invalid

Description : Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning: (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment ( ... must follow from the premise/premises necessarily (D) The argument may be valid or invalid

Last Answer : (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment

Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a deductive type of argument ? (A) The conclusion follows from the premise/premises necessarily. (B) The argument admits degree of complexity. (C) The argument provides us knowledge about matters of fact. (D) The argument must be either valid or invalid.

Description : Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a deductive type of argument ? (A) The conclusion follows from the premise/premises necessarily. (B) The argument admits degree of complexity. ( ... provides us knowledge about matters of fact. (D) The argument must be either valid or invalid.

Last Answer : (C) The argument provides us knowledge about matters of fact.

When in a group of propositions, one proposition is claimed to follow from the others, that group of propositions is called (A) An argument (B) A valid argument (C) An explanation (D) An invalid argument

Description : When in a group of propositions, one proposition is claimed to follow from the others, that group of propositions is called (A) An argument (B) A valid argument (C) An explanation (D) An invalid argument

Last Answer : (A) An argument

Two_______ premises yield no valid conclusion. A) universal B) particular C) affirmative D) categorical.

Description : Two_______ premises yield no valid conclusion. A) universal B) particular C) affirmative D) categorical. 

Last Answer : B) particular 

The defining feature of a valid deduction is its A) vagueness B) uncertatinty C) indefiniteness D) certainty.

Description : The defining feature of a valid deduction is its A) vagueness B) uncertatinty C) indefiniteness D) certainty.

Last Answer : D) certainty. 

Which of the following statements are false ? Choose from the code given below : 1. Inductive arguments always proceed from the particular to the general. 2. A cogent argument must be inductively strong. 3. A valid argument may have a false premise and a false conclusion. 4. An argument may legitimately be spoken of as ‘true’ or ‘false’. Code : (A) 2, 3 and 4 (B) 1 and 3 (C) 2 and 4 (D) 1 and 2

Description : Which of the following statements are false ? Choose from the code given below : 1. Inductive arguments always proceed from the particular to the general. 2. A cogent argument must be inductively strong. 3. A valid argument may have a ... (A) 2, 3 and 4 (B) 1 and 3 (C) 2 and 4 (D) 1 and 2

Last Answer : (C) 2 and 4

What does invalid argument mean?

Description : What does invalid argument mean?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Select the code which states the condition of an invalid deductive argument : (A) All the premises are true but the conclusion is false. (B) Some of the premises are true but the conclusion is false. (C) All the premises are false and the conclusion is also false. (D) All the premises are true and the conclusion is also true.

Description : Select the code which states the condition of an invalid deductive argument : (A) All the premises are true but the conclusion is false. (B) Some of the premises are true but the conclusion is false. ... the conclusion is also false. (D) All the premises are true and the conclusion is also true.

Last Answer : (A) All the premises are true but the conclusion is false. 

A deductive argument is invalid if: (A) Its premises and conclusions are all true (B) Its premises and conclusions are all false (C) Its premises are true but its conclusion is false (D) Its premises are false but its conclusion is true

Description : A deductive argument is invalid if: (A) Its premises and conclusions are all true (B) Its premises and conclusions are all false (C) Its premises are true but its conclusion is false (D) Its premises are false but its conclusion is true

Last Answer : (C) Its premises are true but its conclusion is false

A dilemma is complex when the conclusion is __________ proposition. A) implicative B) categorical C) disjunctive D) negative

Description : A dilemma is complex when the conclusion is __________ proposition. A) implicative B) categorical C) disjunctive D) negative 

Last Answer : C) disjunctive

A dilemma is simple when the conclusion is__________ proposition. A) disjunctive B) implicative C) negative D) categorical

Description : A dilemma is simple when the conclusion is__________ proposition. A) disjunctive B) implicative C) negative D) categorical 

Last Answer : D) categorical 

A dilemma is ________ when disjunctive minor premise denies the consequents of the major premise A) constructive B) destructive C) subjective D) objective

Description : A dilemma is ________ when disjunctive minor premise denies the consequents of the major premise A) constructive B) destructive C) subjective D) objective

Last Answer :  B) destructive

A dilemma is ________ when disjunctive minor premise affirms the antecedents of the major premise A) constructive B) destructive C) objective D) subjective.

Description : A dilemma is ________ when disjunctive minor premise affirms the antecedents of the major premise A) constructive B) destructive C) objective D) subjective. 

Last Answer : A) constructive 

If one premise is particular the conclusion must be_________. A) Universal B) Negative C) Affirmative D) Particular.

Description : If one premise is particular the conclusion must be_________. A) Universal B) Negative C) Affirmative D) Particular. 

Last Answer : D) Particular.  

From two ________ premises no conclusion is possible. A) universal B) affirmative C) negative D) categorical

Description : From two ________ premises no conclusion is possible. A) universal B) affirmative C) negative D) categorical  

Last Answer : C) negative