answer:I don’t live in CA and offer no opinion, but I did a short search on wiki and found this: According to the California Attorney General, the measure would “increase annual state costs ranging from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods”. It would also incur “Potential, but likely not significant, costs to state and local governments due to litigation resulting from possible violations of the requirements of this measure. Some of these costs would be supported by court filing fees that the parties involved in each legal case would be required to pay under existing law.”[3] Opponents argued that “Prop. 37 is a deceptive, deeply flawed food labeling scheme, full of special-interest exemptions and loopholes. Prop. 37 would: create new government bureaucracy costing taxpayers millions, authorize expensive shakedown lawsuits against farmers and small businesses, and increase family grocery bills by hundreds of dollars per year.”[4] Was there ever any mention of who was going to pay for the inspectors? Would CA require new labels for foods that were sold in other states? Would food grown or manufactured in other states be required to have CA labels? Who will pay for that?