Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

What is the answer ?
by

Related questions

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

What Supreme Court decision allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities?

Description : What Supreme Court decision allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities?

Last Answer : Need answer

This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Which of these court rulings held that separate schools were unequal, and thus a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Description : Which of these court rulings held that separate schools were unequal, and thus a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Last Answer : Mendez v. Westminster

Why were some schools still segregated in 1960 even though the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation was unconstitutional in 1954?

Description : Why were some schools still segregated in 1960 even though the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation was unconstitutional in 1954?

Last Answer : Reginald F. Lewis (December 7, 1942 - January 19, 1993), was an American businessman. He was one of the richest African-American men in the 1980s, and the first African American to build a ... In 1993, Forbes listed Lewis among the 400 richest Americans, with a net worth estimated at $400 million.

THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Description : THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Last Answer : Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

How did the Supreme Court's interpretation of the equal protection clause differ in the Plessy Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education rulings?

Description : How did the Supreme Court's interpretation of the equal protection clause differ in the Plessy Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education rulings?

Last Answer : in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause allowedracial segregation; in the brown, it ruled that clause did notallow segregation

Are blacks any less prejudiced against whites than whites are against blacks in the United States?

Description : Are blacks any less prejudiced against whites than whites are against blacks in the United States?

Last Answer : Answer.

Which outcomes of reconstruction most likely appealed to both southern blacks and whites?

Description : Which outcomes of reconstruction most likely appealed to both southern blacks and whites?

Last Answer : the introduction of a tax-supported school system

Martin Luther king Junior thought that whites and blacks?

Description : Martin Luther king Junior thought that whites and blacks?

Last Answer : could live together in peace~apex

Affirmative Action policy is to help: (a) Whites (b) Blacks (c) Women (d) None of these

Description : Affirmative Action policy is to help: (a) Whites (b) Blacks (c) Women (d) None of these

Last Answer : (d) None of these

Which supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the United States?

Description : Which supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the United States?

Last Answer : The Dred Scott decision

Why were the 13th 14th and 15th amendments passed by Congress?

Description : Why were the 13th 14th and 15th amendments passed by Congress?

Last Answer : Need answer

How did the 14th and 15th amendments change the constitution?

Description : How did the 14th and 15th amendments change the constitution?

Last Answer : The 14th Amendment outlawed slavery and granted civil rights and liberties to African-Americans. The 15th Amendment prohibited the government from denying a citizen the right to vote based on race.

On which of the following grounds can a judge of the Supreme Court be impeached? (1) Violation of constitution (2) Proved misbehaviors (3) Incapacity to act as a judge (4) (2) & (3) both

Description : On which of the following grounds can a judge of the Supreme Court be impeached? (1) Violation of constitution (2) Proved misbehaviors (3) Incapacity to act as a judge (4) (2) & (3) both

Last Answer : (4) (2) & (3) both Explanation: A judge of the Supreme Court can be removed under the Constitution only on grounds of proven misconduct or incapacity and by an order of the President of India, after ... Sabha (Council of the States) is passed by a two-third majority in each House of the Parliament.

Impeachment Proceedings against the President for violation of the Constitution can be intiated in : (1) Either House of Parliament (2) The Lok Sabha (3) The Rajya Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Description : Impeachment Proceedings against the President for violation of the Constitution can be intiated in : (1) Either House of Parliament (2) The Lok Sabha (3) The Rajya Sabha (4) The Supreme Court

Last Answer : (1) Either House of Parliament Explanation ; According to Article 61 of Indian Constitution, when a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either ... passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.

Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Description : Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Last Answer : Article32

If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Description : If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Last Answer : B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

According to the Supreme Court of India, the foundation of composite culture', as mentioned in clause (f) of Article 51 A, is : (1) the diverse culture of India (2) the Sanskrit language and literature (3) the secular fabric of India (4) the values evolved during the freedom movement

Description : According to the Supreme Court of India, the foundation of composite culture', as mentioned in clause (f) of Article 51 A, is : (1) the diverse culture of India (2) the Sanskrit language and literature (3) the secular fabric of India (4) the values evolved during the freedom movement

Last Answer : (2) the Sanskrit language and literature Explanation: According to Supreme Court of India, the Foundation of `Composite Culture', as mentioned in clause (f) of Article 51 A is the Sanskrit Language and literature.

In the brown ruling, the Supreme Court required public schools to desegregate?

Description : In the brown ruling, the Supreme Court required public schools to desegregate?

Last Answer : This decision actually declared that states' practices where separate schools be used to educate white children and black children was unconstitutional. It overturned an 1896 decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, which allowed segregation in public schools to be sponsored by individual states.

Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Description : Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Last Answer : Yes! Great idea. @ragingloli

Did you hear that the US Supreme Court ruled against being able to patent genes?

Description : Did you hear that the US Supreme Court ruled against being able to patent genes?

Last Answer : I had not heard until now – but this is great news!

In 1916 what supreme court ruled that it was constitutional to?

Description : In 1916 what supreme court ruled that it was constitutional to?

Last Answer : Require a higher rate of pay after eight hours of work per day- apex

In Gratz v. Bollinger the Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan and chief admissions officer violated .?

Description : In Gratz v. Bollinger the Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan and chief admissions officer violated .?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Description : When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Last Answer : Need answer

In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Description : In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Last Answer : "Money is speech"

In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Description : In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Last Answer : "Money is speech"

In 2018 Which South Asian Country Supreme court has ruled that gay sex is no longer a criminal offence in the country? (a) Bangladesh (b) India (c) Nepal (d) None of These

Description : In 2018 Which South Asian Country Supreme court has ruled that gay sex is no longer a criminal offence in the country? (a) Bangladesh (b) India (c) Nepal (d) None of These

Last Answer : (b) India

This was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were "separate but equal."?

Description : This was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were "separate but equal."?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson pretty sure

What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Description : What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Last Answer : (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest Explanation: Public Interest Litigation, or PIL, is defined as the use of litigation, or legal action, which seeks to advance the cause ... who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court.

In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Description : In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Last Answer : Need answer

The elimination of the practice of providing separate schools and other public facilities for racial groups?

Description : The elimination of the practice of providing separate schools and other public facilities for racial groups?

Last Answer : not sure

Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Description : Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Last Answer : answer:Criminally negligent? No. Child endangerment? Yes. These “parents” (and I use the term only in its biological sense) should lose parental rights. All they have done is raised 9 children who will be incapable of crossing a street, let alone take care of them selves or hold a job.

What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Description : What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Description : In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Description : What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Last Answer : You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework.Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills skillsand not our answers.

What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?

Description : What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?

Last Answer : It formed the basis for the need of Judicial review.

What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Description : What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Last Answer : Need answer

What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Description : What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Last Answer : Need answer

What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Description : What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Last Answer : Need answer

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Description : To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: Article 71 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that all doubts and disputes relating to election of a President or VicePresident are required to be enquired into and decided by the Supreme Court.

To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Description : To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: According to Article 71 of the Constitution, all doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President ... and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, an election petition can be filed before the Supreme Court.

The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Description : The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Last Answer : (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case Explanation: The basic structure doctrine was first articulated by Justice Hans Raj Khanna in the landmark decision of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (case ... the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the constitution.

The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Description : The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Last Answer : (4) five Explanation: Minimum five Judges of the Supreme Court are required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference to it.