Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

answer:Criminally negligent? No. Child endangerment? Yes. These “parents” (and I use the term only in its biological sense) should lose parental rights. All they have done is raised 9 children who will be incapable of crossing a street, let alone take care of them selves or hold a job.
by

Related questions

What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Description : What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Last Answer : Need answer

Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Description : Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Last Answer : (2) Supreme Court Explanation: Supreme Court has the power to transfer any Case, appeal or other proceedings from High Court or other court in one State to a High Court or other civil court in any other State.

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : B) Keshavanand Bharati case

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : (B) Keshavanand Bharati case

If it was your call, what Supreme Court Justice/s would you replace?

Description : If it was your call, what Supreme Court Justice/s would you replace?

Last Answer : Roberts Scalia Alito Kennedy and Thomas

What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Description : What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Description : In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Description : What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Last Answer : You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework.Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills skillsand not our answers.

What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?

Description : What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?

Last Answer : It formed the basis for the need of Judicial review.

Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Description : Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Description : What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Last Answer : Need answer

What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Description : What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Last Answer : Need answer

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Description : What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Last Answer : (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest Explanation: Public Interest Litigation, or PIL, is defined as the use of litigation, or legal action, which seeks to advance the cause ... who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court.

To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Description : To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: Article 71 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that all doubts and disputes relating to election of a President or VicePresident are required to be enquired into and decided by the Supreme Court.

To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Description : To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: According to Article 71 of the Constitution, all doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President ... and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, an election petition can be filed before the Supreme Court.

The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Description : The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Last Answer : (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case Explanation: The basic structure doctrine was first articulated by Justice Hans Raj Khanna in the landmark decision of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (case ... the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the constitution.

The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Description : The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Last Answer : (4) five Explanation: Minimum five Judges of the Supreme Court are required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference to it.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Mark the correct option relating to competent authority means:- a) The president or the governor in case of constituted by or under the constitution b) Speaker in case of house of people c) The chief justice of high court in case of a high court d) Chief justice of India in case of supreme court e) All the above

Description : Mark the correct option relating to competent authority means:- a) The president or the governor in case of constituted by or under the constitution b) Speaker in case of house of people c) The chief justice ... of a high court d) Chief justice of India in case of supreme court e) All the above

Last Answer : e) All the above

The District forum, the State commission or the National commission as the case may be, shall have power of a a) Supreme court judge b) High court judge c) Judicial magistrate of the first classd) All the above

Description : The District forum, the State commission or the National commission as the case  may be, shall have power of a  a) Supreme court judge b) High court judge c) Judicial magistrate of the first classd) All the above

Last Answer : c) Judicial magistrate of the first class

If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Description : If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Last Answer : B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

Does it bother you that the textbooks used across the country need to conform to the standards of the Texas State School Board?

Description : Does it bother you that the textbooks used across the country need to conform to the standards of the Texas State School Board?

Last Answer : How does it make me feel? Disgusted.

What's a good school in Texas that is a state school to get a Doctorate in Psychiatry?

Description : What's a good school in Texas that is a state school to get a Doctorate in Psychiatry?

Last Answer : Psychiatry is a medical degree. Are you interested in psychiatry or psychology?

Did the Supreme Court get this right?

Description : Did the Supreme Court get this right?

Last Answer : The more they free-speech it, the quicker we can find them and prosecute them for animal cruelty. or just have a nice ‘talk’

Why was the religious right upset with some of president reagan’s supreme court appointments?

Description : Why was the religious right upset with some of president reagan’s supreme court appointments?

Last Answer : They ruled in favor of gay rights

Why was the Religious Right upset with some of President Reagan's Supreme Court appointments ?

Description : Why was the Religious Right upset with some of President Reagan's Supreme Court appointments ?

Last Answer : they supported womens rights to have an abortion -

Why was the religious right upset with some of President Reagan’s supreme court appointment?

Description : Why was the religious right upset with some of President Reagan’s supreme court appointment?

Last Answer : They struck down a school prayer law. or they upheld a woman's right to have an abortion. or They ruled in favor of gay rights

Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Description : Right to the enjoyment of pollution free water as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Subhas Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (1991) falls under - (1) Right to Equality (2) Right to Liberty (3) Right against Exploitation (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty

Last Answer : (4) Right to Life and Personal liberty Explanation: Right to life and personal liberty is Article 21 of Fundamental rights. Without this right, for an individual to enjoy other fundamental rights become meaningless.

Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation and business (2) Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Description : Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation ... any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Last Answer : (4) Freedom of the press Explanation: The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Description : The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Last Answer : (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the Private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under Article 19 (1) (1) of the constitution.

The Attorney General of India has the right of audience in – (1) the Supreme Court (2) any High Court (3) any Sessions Court (4) any Court of Law within India

Description : The Attorney General of India has the right of audience in – (1) the Supreme Court (2) any High Court (3) any Sessions Court (4) any Court of Law within India

Last Answer : (4) any Court of Law within India Explanation: The Attorney General has the right of audience in all Courts in India as well as the right to participate in the proceedings of the Parliament, ... the Indian government's chief legal advisor, and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India.

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other (3) between two or more States, if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Description : The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India does not extend to which of the following matters? (1) between the Government of India and one or more States (2) between the ... (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument

Last Answer : (4) dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sand or other similar instrument Explanation: Any dispute between the Union and one or more states comes under the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.

Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any judge of the High Court (4) All of the above

Description : Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any judge of the High Court (4) All of the above

Last Answer : (2) President Explanation: According to Article 143 of the Constitution of India, the President of India can request the Supreme Court of India to provide its advice on certain matters. This procedure is called "Presidential Reference".

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Description : Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Last Answer : (1) Right to privacy Explanation: Judicial activism has brought the Right to Privacy within the realm of Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court of India has construed "right to privacy" as a part of ... conceive to be their duty must strictly and scrupulously observe the forms and rules of the law".

The Attorney General of India has the right to audience in – (1) any Sessions Court (2) High Court (3) Supreme Court (4) any court of law within the territory of India

Description : The Attorney General of India has the right to audience in – (1) any Sessions Court (2) High Court (3) Supreme Court (4) any court of law within the territory of India

Last Answer : (4) any court of law within the territory of India Explanation: Powers and duties of the Attorney General of India is given in Article 76 of the Indian Constitution which mentions that in the ... in any reference made by the President to the Supreme Court under Article 143 of the Constitution.

Who has the right under the Constitution to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on Question of law? (1) President (2) Any High Court (3) Prime Minister (4) All the above

Description : Who has the right under the Constitution to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on Question of law? (1) President (2) Any High Court (3) Prime Minister (4) All the above

Last Answer : (1) President Explanation: President can seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on the question of law or fact which has arisen or is likely to arise of such nature. Article 143 of the Constitution of India directs it as a duty upon the Supreme Court to advise the President on such matter.

Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any of the high courts (4) All of the above

Description : Who has the right to seek advisory opinion of the Supreme Court of India, on any question of law? (1) Prime Minister (2) President (3) Any of the high courts (4) All of the above

Last Answer : (2) President Explanation: President has the right to seek advisory opinion of the supreme court of India.

Indian citizen have the right to information because of a) Judgment of Supreme court b) Implementation of international laws by Indian govt c) All states adopted agree to implement the act d) A law passed by the parliament of India

Description : Indian citizen have the right to information because of a) Judgment of Supreme court b) Implementation of international laws by Indian govt c) All states adopted agree to implement the act d) A law passed by the parliament of India

Last Answer : d) A law passed by the parliament of India

The Supreme Court of India recognizes Fundamental Right as a. Natural right b. Political right. c. Social right. d. All of these.

Description : The Supreme Court of India recognizes Fundamental Right as a. Natural right b. Political right. c. Social right. d. All of these.

Last Answer : b. Political right.

Which of the following can be done under conditions of financial emergency? 1. State Legislative Assemblies can be abolished. 2. Central Government can acquire control over the budget and expenditure of States. 3. Salaries of the Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court can be reduced. 4. Right to Constitutional Remedies can be suspended. Select the correct answer from the codes given below: Codes: (A) 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1 and 2 (D) 2 and 3

Description : Which of the following can be done under conditions of financial emergency? 1. State Legislative Assemblies can be abolished. 2. Central Government can acquire control over the budget and expenditure of States. 3. Salaries of the Judges of ... 1, 2 and 3 (B) 2, 3 and 4 (C) 1 and 2 (D) 2 and 3

Last Answer : (D) 2 and 3

The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an inferior court or body exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions to transfer the record to proceedings in a case for its review (3) where it can call upon a person to show under what authority he/she is holding the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Description : The writ of Prohibition is issued by a superior court - (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice (2) to an ... the office (4) to an authority to produce an illegally detained person before the court for trial.

Last Answer : (1) to prevent an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice Explanation: The writ of Prohibition is an order from a superior ... because the lower court does not have proper jurisdiction to hear or determine the matters before it.

Is it okay to call after sending in an application?

Description : Is it okay to call after sending in an application?

Last Answer : Always call, unless the employer instructs you not to. When you call, also inquire about whether or not you need to stay in touch, or can expect to hear back.

How much schooling have you had, and what do you call your various school years - e.g. grade school and high school? Middle school? Wherever in the world you are - please explain a bit about your schooling system.

Description : How much schooling have you had, and what do you call your various school years - e.g. grade school and high school? Middle school? Wherever in the world you are - please explain a bit about your schooling system.

Last Answer : I finished 7 of 11 grades in Russia where schools weren't divided into age-related portions. When I moved to the US, I went to some middle school followed by high school through grade 12. I went to ... in a PhD program that should last around 5-7 years. I never went to pre-school or kindergarten.

What would you call a decent salary at this point in your life?

Description : What would you call a decent salary at this point in your life?

Last Answer : I remember a long time ago when the standard definition of “a good salary” was 1,000 times your age. Now it’s probably more like 2,000. Of course, higher is better and lower works if it’s all you got.

Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India. (2) There is one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency. (3) The Parliament has the power to make laws relating to the delimitation of constituencies. (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Description : Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India ... has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies. Explanation: Under Article 82 of the constitution, ... the delimitation commission demarcates the boundary of parliamentary constituency on the basis of Delimitation Act.

With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. (3) The minimum age prescribed for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court is 40 years. (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Description : With reference to India polity, which one of the following statements is correct? (1) Planning commission is accountable to parliament. (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses ... (4) NDC is constituted of Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of all the states.

Last Answer : (2) President can make ordinance only when either of the two houses of parliament is not in session. Explanation: President can promulgate ordinances when the parliament is not in session. ... take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require.