What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?

What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

It formed the basis for the need of Judicial review.
by
selected by

Related questions

What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Description : What is the significance of the supreme court case Marbury v. Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Description : This 1896 Supreme Court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided A. Plessy v. Ferguson B. Marbury v. Madison C. Brown v. Board of Education D. Dred Scott v. Stanford?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson

When and where did the case take place for marbury v Madison?

Description : When and where did the case take place for marbury v Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

How might the marbury v. Madison ruling affect future action by congress?

Description : How might the marbury v. Madison ruling affect future action by congress?

Last Answer : The Marbury v. Madison ruling cemented the idea of checks andbalances by establishing the idea of judicial review. This allowedfor the Supreme Court to interpret and declare lawsunconstitutional as they saw fit.

Which action did the marbury v. Madison ruling make possible?

Description : Which action did the marbury v. Madison ruling make possible?

Last Answer : The Supreme Court voinds a new tax because it UN constitutionally targets religious minorities

What did marbury hope to achieve by suing Secretary of State James Madison?

Description : What did marbury hope to achieve by suing Secretary of State James Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

What describes the effect of the marbury vs Madison decision apex?

Description : What describes the effect of the marbury vs Madison decision apex?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

What was the significance of the Supreme Court decision bush v gore?

Description : What was the significance of the Supreme Court decision bush v gore?

Last Answer : the supreme court ended a recount in Florida that had stalled the election.

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Description : In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional; however, this ruling was overturned by other Supreme Court cases and segregation was found to be unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : 1

What was the Supreme Court decision in pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust?

Description : What was the Supreme Court decision in pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust?

Last Answer : the federal income tax was unconstitutional

In the 1925 gitlow v New York the Supreme Court rules that?

Description : In the 1925 gitlow v New York the Supreme Court rules that?

Last Answer : rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights must also be guaranteed by the states

How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Gideon v Wainwright?

Description : How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Gideon v Wainwright?

Last Answer : it established that states must provide people accused of crimeswith access to an attorney

In Gratz v. Bollinger the Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan and chief admissions officer violated .?

Description : In Gratz v. Bollinger the Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan and chief admissions officer violated .?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

How did the supreme court reinterpret civil liberties in tinker v. Dee Moines?

Description : How did the supreme court reinterpret civil liberties in tinker v. Dee Moines?

Last Answer : Need answer

In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Description : In Bigelow v. Virginia 1975 the Supreme Court extended protection to what form of speech?

Last Answer : Need answer

THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Description : THe landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka held that separate schools for black and white children were equal?

Last Answer : Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want

The Supreme Court decision in brown v. Board of education overturned its earlier decision in?

Description : The Supreme Court decision in brown v. Board of education overturned its earlier decision in?

Last Answer : Plessy v. Ferguson.

What was the Supreme Court decision in korematsu v United States?

Description : What was the Supreme Court decision in korematsu v United States?

Last Answer : the government was allowed to take away individual rights in times of war

What was the reaction to the supreme court decision and Nixon v. Herndon?

Description : What was the reaction to the supreme court decision and Nixon v. Herndon?

Last Answer : The Texas Democratic Party passed rules to ensure continued discrimination.

How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Description : In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Last Answer : "Money is speech"

What was the Supreme Court decision in korematsu v United States?

Description : What was the Supreme Court decision in korematsu v United States?

Last Answer : the government was allowed to take away individual rights in times of war

What was the reaction to the supreme court decision and Nixon v. Herndon?

Description : What was the reaction to the supreme court decision and Nixon v. Herndon?

Last Answer : The Texas Democratic Party passed rules to ensure continued discrimination.

How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Description : How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

Last Answer : it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections

In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Description : In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?

Last Answer : "Money is speech"

The first High/Supreme Court judge, who voluntarily made his assets public is - (1) Justice D.V.S. Kumar (2) Justice K. Chandra (3) Justice K. Kannan (4) Justice V.C. Srivastava

Description : The first High/Supreme Court judge, who voluntarily made his assets public is - (1) Justice D.V.S. Kumar (2) Justice K. Chandra (3) Justice K. Kannan (4) Justice V.C. Srivastava

Last Answer : (3) Justice K. Kannan Explanation: High court judge Justice K Kannan was the first judge to have voluntarily made his assets public.

Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Description : Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Last Answer : answer:Criminally negligent? No. Child endangerment? Yes. These “parents” (and I use the term only in its biological sense) should lose parental rights. All they have done is raised 9 children who will be incapable of crossing a street, let alone take care of them selves or hold a job.

In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Description : In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

Last Answer : Need answer

What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Description : What is the supreme court case study 42 answer?

Last Answer : You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework.Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills skillsand not our answers.

Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Description : Was the Supreme Court case that ruled that maintaining separate public schools for blacks and whites was in violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Description : What type of jurisdiction did the supreme court have in this case and why?

Last Answer : Need answer

What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Description : What U.S. supreme court case defined the constitutional right to counsel at police interrogation?

Last Answer : Need answer

What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Description : What are the answers Supreme Court case study 4?

Last Answer : Need answer

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Description : What is the meaning of “Public Interest Litigation”? (1) Anything of public interest (2) A case brought by victim to court, involving public interest (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest (4) A directive issued by Supreme Court involving public interest

Last Answer : (3) Acase brought by anyone to court involving public interest Explanation: Public Interest Litigation, or PIL, is defined as the use of litigation, or legal action, which seeks to advance the cause ... who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court.

To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Description : To whom can a case of dispute in the election of the President be referred? (1) Chief Election Commissioner (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) None of these

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: Article 71 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that all doubts and disputes relating to election of a President or VicePresident are required to be enquired into and decided by the Supreme Court.

To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Description : To whome can a case of dispute in the election of the President of India be referred to? (1) Election Commission (2) Parliament (3) Supreme Court of India (4) Cabinet

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court of India Explanation: According to Article 71 of the Constitution, all doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President ... and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, an election petition can be filed before the Supreme Court.

The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Description : The Basic Structure of our Constitution was proclaimed by the Supreme Court in – (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case (2) Golak Nath Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) Gopalan Case

Last Answer : (1) Keshvananda Bharati Case Explanation: The basic structure doctrine was first articulated by Justice Hans Raj Khanna in the landmark decision of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (case ... the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the constitution.

The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Description : The minimum number of Judges of the Supreme Court required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution is (1) ten (2) nine (3) seven (4) five

Last Answer : (4) five Explanation: Minimum five Judges of the Supreme Court are required for hearing any case involving interpretation of the Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference to it.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Description : Who has the right to transfer any case anywhere in India? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) High Court (4) None of these

Last Answer : (2) Supreme Court Explanation: Supreme Court has the power to transfer any Case, appeal or other proceedings from High Court or other court in one State to a High Court or other civil court in any other State.

Mark the correct option relating to competent authority means:- a) The president or the governor in case of constituted by or under the constitution b) Speaker in case of house of people c) The chief justice of high court in case of a high court d) Chief justice of India in case of supreme court e) All the above

Description : Mark the correct option relating to competent authority means:- a) The president or the governor in case of constituted by or under the constitution b) Speaker in case of house of people c) The chief justice ... of a high court d) Chief justice of India in case of supreme court e) All the above

Last Answer : e) All the above

The District forum, the State commission or the National commission as the case may be, shall have power of a a) Supreme court judge b) High court judge c) Judicial magistrate of the first classd) All the above

Description : The District forum, the State commission or the National commission as the case  may be, shall have power of a  a) Supreme court judge b) High court judge c) Judicial magistrate of the first classd) All the above

Last Answer : c) Judicial magistrate of the first class

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : B) Keshavanand Bharati case

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : (B) Keshavanand Bharati case

If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Description : If the amount claimed by consumer is Rs. 89 Lacs, the case under the consumer protection act shall be filed with A. District Consumer Redressal forum B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission C. National consumer Dispute Redressal Commission D. Supreme court

Last Answer : B. State consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

WHAT is the importance of Marburg v. Madison?

Description : WHAT is the importance of Marburg v. Madison?

Last Answer : Need answer

What happened for the first time in Mardbury v. Madison?

Description : What happened for the first time in Mardbury v. Madison?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer