answer:Yes, and it is a move that they should have made a couple of years ago. As you note in your question, the Chamber’s view “business at all costs” – which generally means that ethics, morals, and decency are sacrificed to the ‘end’ of business business business. Something along the line of “profit without ethics” is inherently better than profit with morality. This is, of course, inimical to Google’s stance, which is “business and profit are good, but we have to do this in the context of ethics and morality”. Since they are at two opposite ends of the spectrum, I don’t see how Google can reconcile its membership in the Chamber with its professed values.