Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?

1 Answer

Answer :

Feel Free to Answer

Related questions

Description : A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is A) valid and all its premises are true B) invalid and all its premises are true C) is valid and one of the premise is false D) is valid and its conclusion is false. 

Last Answer : A) valid and all its premises are true 

Description : If it is possible for the premises of a deductive argument to be true and its conclusion to be false, that argument is A) Valid B) Invalid C) Indescribable D) Sound.  

Last Answer : B) Invalid

Description : The falsehood of a valid deductive argument’s conclusion guarantees that A) the argument is sound B) atleast one of the premise is false C) premises are true D) the validity is uncertain. 

Last Answer : B) atleast one of the premise is false 

Description : Select the code, which is not correct in the context of deductive argument with two premises: (A) An argument with one true premise, one false premise and a false conclusion may be valid. (B) An argument ... may be valid. (D) An argument with two false premises and a false conclusion may be valid. 

Last Answer : (B) An argument with two true premises and a false conclusion may be valid. 

Description : A deductive argument can not be valid : (A) If its premise / premises is/are true and its conclusion is true. (B) If its premise / premises is /are true and its conclusion is false. (C) If ... conclusion is false. (D) If its premise / premises is / are false and its conclusion is true.

Last Answer : (B) If its premise / premises is /are true and its conclusion is false

Description : A deductive argument is valid if: (A) premises are false and conclusion true (B) premises are false and conclusion is also false (C) premises are true and conclusion is false (D) premises are true and conclusion is true

Last Answer : (D) premises are true and conclusion is true

Description : Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning: (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment ( ... must follow from the premise/premises necessarily (D) The argument may be valid or invalid

Last Answer : (A) The conclusion must be based on observation and experiment

Description : Which one among the following is not a characteristic of a deductive type of argument ? (A) The conclusion follows from the premise/premises necessarily. (B) The argument admits degree of complexity. ( ... provides us knowledge about matters of fact. (D) The argument must be either valid or invalid.

Last Answer : (C) The argument provides us knowledge about matters of fact.

Description : The premises of a valid deductive argument: (A) Provide some evidence for its conclusion (B) Provide no evidence for its conclusion (C) Are irrelevant for its conclusion (D) Provide conclusive evidence for its conclusion

Last Answer : (D) Provide conclusive evidence for its conclusion

Description : Select the code which states the condition of an invalid deductive argument : (A) All the premises are true but the conclusion is false. (B) Some of the premises are true but the conclusion is false. ... the conclusion is also false. (D) All the premises are true and the conclusion is also true.

Last Answer : (A) All the premises are true but the conclusion is false. 

Description : A deductive argument is invalid if: (A) Its premises and conclusions are all true (B) Its premises and conclusions are all false (C) Its premises are true but its conclusion is false (D) Its premises are false but its conclusion is true

Last Answer : (C) Its premises are true but its conclusion is false

Description : Choose the right code: A deductive argument claims that: I. The conclusion does not claim something more than that which is contained in the premises. II. The conclusion is supported by the premise/premises conclusively. III. If ... (A) I and II (B) I and III (C) II and III (D) All the above

Last Answer : Answer: A

Description : The relationship between premises and conclusion in a deductive argument is--. A) Cause-Effect B) Analytic-Synthetic C) A priori-A posterior D) Implication-Entailment. 

Last Answer : D) Implication-Entailment. 

Description : The premises provide conclusive grounds for the conclusion in ----------- argument. A) Inductive B) Deductive C) Fallacious D) Intuitive

Last Answer : B) Deductive

Description : When the conclusion of an argument follows from its premise/premises conclusively, the argument is called (A) Circular argument (B) Inductive argument (C) Deductive argument (D) Analogical argument

Last Answer : (C) Deductive argument

Description : In a deductive argument conclusion is: (A) Summing up of the premises (B) Not necessarily based on premises (C) Entailed by the premises (D) Additional to the premises

Last Answer : (C) Entailed by the premises

Description : Which of the following statements are false ? Choose from the code given below : 1. Inductive arguments always proceed from the particular to the general. 2. A cogent argument must be inductively strong. 3. A valid argument may have a ... (A) 2, 3 and 4 (B) 1 and 3 (C) 2 and 4 (D) 1 and 2

Last Answer : (C) 2 and 4

Description : Which of the following statements are true? Choose from the codes given below. 1. Some arguments, while not completely valid, are almost valid. 2. A sound argument may be invalid. 3. A cogent argument may have a probably false ... Codes: (A) 1 and 2 (B) 1, 3 and 4 (C) 4 alone (D) 3 and 4

Last Answer : (D) 3 and 4

Description : A valid deductive argument with true premises is called a ------ argument. A) sound B) unsound C) fallacious D) dilemma.  

Last Answer : A) sound 

Description : Which one of the following supports “reasoning moves from general to specific situation or conclusion”? a. Scientific reasoning b. Deductive reasoning c. Inductive reasoning d. None of the above

Last Answer : b. Deductive reasoning

Description : Which form of reasoning is the process of drawing a specific conclusion from a set of premises? a. Rationalism b. Deductive Reasoning c. Inductive Reasoning d. Probabilistic

Last Answer : b. Deductive Reasoning

Description : Deductive reasoning proceeds from (A) general to particular (B) particular to general (C) one general conclusion to another general conclusion (D) one particular conclusion to another particular conclusion

Last Answer : (A) general to particular

Description : The following argument:  Aristotle is human and mortal.  Bacon is human and mortal.  Castro is human and mortal.  Descartes is human and mortal.  Therefore all humans are mortal.  is an example ... ---- argument. A) Deductive  B) Inductive C) Syllogistic D) Deduction-Induction combined. 

Last Answer : B) Inductive 

Description : Consider the following statement and select the correct code stating the nature of the argument involved in it: To suppose that the earth is the only populated world in the infinite space is as absurd ... only one grain will grow. (A) Astronomical (B) Anthropological (C) Deductive (D) Analogical

Last Answer : (D) Analogical

Description : Consider the argument given below: ‘Pre - employment testing of teachers is quite fair because doctors, architects and engineers who are now employed had to face such a testing.’ What type of argument it is? (A) Deductive (B) Analogical (C) Psychological (D) Biological

Last Answer : Answer: B

Description : A man ought no more to value himself for being wiser than a woman if he owes his advantage to a better education, than he ought to boast of his courage for beating a man when his hands ... an instance of (A) Deductive argument (B) Hypothetical argument (C) Analogical argument (D) Factual argument

Last Answer : (C) Analogical argument

Description : "lf a large diamond is cut up into little bits, it will lose its value just as an army is divided up into small units of soldiers, it loses its strength." The argument put above may be called as (A) Analogical (B) Deductive (C) Statistical (D) Casual

Last Answer : (A) Analogical

Description : Saturn and Mars are planets like the earth. They borrow light from the Sun and moves around the Sun as the Earth does. So those planets are inhabited by various orders of creatures as the earth is ... is contained in the above passage ? (A) Deductive (B) Astrological (C) Analogical (D) Mathematical

Last Answer : (C) Analogical 

Description : Deductive argument involves (A) sufficient evidence (B) critical thinking (C) seeing logical relations (D) repeated observation

Last Answer : (C) seeing logical relations

Description : All Indians are hardworking All Keralites are Indians Therefore, All Keralites are hardworking The above argument is A) Invalid B) False C) Valid D) True 

Last Answer : C) Valid 

Description : determine whether it is argument or not argument Write the premises and conclusion separately?

Last Answer : 1) economics should never have sought to divorce itself from the other social sciences and can advance only in conjunction with them.2) ... speculation 3) Economists are all too often preoccupied with petty mathematical problems of interest only to themselves .?

Description : What is a coherence is an absurd conclusion that follows form an argument that appears to be good?

Last Answer : What is the answer ?

Description : Is a paradox an absurd conclusion that follows from an argument that appears to be good?

Last Answer : A paradox doesn't have to be a conclusion from an argument itcan be an absurd or contradictory statement or proposition whichwhen investigated may prove to be well founded or true.

Description : Is a paradox an absurd conclusion that follows from an argument that appears to be good?

Last Answer : A paradox doesn't have to be a conclusion from an argument itcan be an absurd or contradictory statement or proposition whichwhen investigated may prove to be well founded or true.

Description : Evaluating an argument involves a. assessing the reasons given and their relationship to the conclusion. b. dismissing the reasons given and their relationship to the conclusion. c. assessing the ... the conclusion. d. assessing the conclusion, and reformulating the reasons given for the conclusion.

Last Answer : a. assessing the reasons given and their relationship to the conclusion.

Description : Both premises and conclusion of an argument are _______. A) Commands B) Propositions C) Exclamations  D) Questions.  

Last Answer : B) Propositions 

Description : The claim of an inductive argument is that premises provide---------- for the conclusion. A) invalidity B) absolute evidence C) no evidence D) some evidence 

Last Answer : D) some evidence 

Description : Propositions which supports the conclusion of an argument are called  A) Inferences B) Premises C) Terms D) Concepts.

Last Answer : B) Premises 

Description : Select the code which is not correct :  An analogical argument is strengthened by (A) increasing the number of entities. (B) increasing the number of similar respects. (C) reducing the claim made earlier stronger. (D) making the conclusion stronger when premises remain unchanged.

Last Answer : (D) making the conclusion stronger when premises remain unchanged. 

Description : Given below are some characteristics of logical argument. Select the code which expresses a characteristic which is not of inductive in character. (A) The conclusion is claimed to follow from ... conclusively follows from its premises. (D) The conclusion is based on observation and experiment

Last Answer : (C) The conclusion conclusively follows from its premises. 

Description : which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source’s conclusion is valid?

Last Answer : Answer this question… Comparing the conclusion with severalother sources

Description : Attempting to find a win-win solution that allows both parties‟ goals to be completely achieved and seeking a conclusion that incorporates the valid insights of both parties is an example of which conflicthandling intention? (a) collaborating ; (b) accommodating ; (c) avoiding ; (d) competing

Last Answer : (a) collaborating ;

Description : Two_______ premises yield no valid conclusion. A) universal B) particular C) affirmative D) categorical. 

Last Answer : B) particular 

Description : Is the common argument against technology, that you will lose a common and essential skill, actually a valid objection?

Last Answer : I don’t understand. You state that you don’t believe the premise true, then list examples highlighting its validity. Which is it?

Description : Why is a person's "label" sometimes deemed as a valid dismissal to any argument?

Last Answer : I agree. Dismissing arguments based on labels, either self-appointed or given, is a cop-out. Discuss the points raised. Dismissing out of hand' is not ok. It is perfectly ok to point out ... in understanding and drawing out facts and help you counter any points. Labels are for boxes. Not people.

Description : I'll agree that you have a valid argument for the prohibition of marijuana when you can present a valid argument for parking lots outside of bars. Thoughts from the collective?

Last Answer : you need somewhere for designated drivers to park their cars. also, where would the fights happen?

Description : The following argument:  “ All mammals have wings.  All reptiles are mammals.  Therefore all reptiles have wings ”. A) Inductive  B) invalid  C) sound  D) Valid. 

Last Answer :  D) Valid. 

Description : A Cluster of propositions with a structure that exhibits some inference is called (A) An inference (B) An argument (C) An explanation (D) A valid argument

Last Answer : Answer: B

Description : When in a group of propositions, one proposition is claimed to follow from the others, that group of propositions is called (A) An argument (B) A valid argument (C) An explanation (D) An invalid argument

Last Answer : (A) An argument

Description : A single ------ is enough to prove the inductive conclusion false. A) intuition B) Assumption C) counter-example D) concept. 

Last Answer : C) counter-example