answer:This is interesting and I’m certain it could serve as a valuable aid to teaching a whole slew of subjects. “The object is for all countries to come out ahead.” If that’s really the case, then the game seems flawed to me from the outset and it would naturally drive the players to cooperative and altruistic behavior. In real life, leaders of truly independent nation states get little to no credit for improving conditions in countries other than their own. Are students really free to realistically role play dictatorial regimes? Coming at it like these students, if it’s called the “World Peace Game”, I’m not sure my efforts would be appreciated by the teacher if I embarked on regional or world conquest and wholesale internal repression of dissent, even if such would be the logical outcome of my government’s ideological makeup. And leaving out such countries would seem to make world peace much easier to achieve.