What did the supreme court do about laws in Georgia that took away the rights of Cherokee?

What did the supreme court do about laws in Georgia that took away the rights of Cherokee?
by

1 Answer

Answer :

It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
by

Related questions

Why did the treatment of the Cherokee get worse after the Supreme Court declares Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?

Description : Why did the treatment of the Cherokee get worse after the Supreme Court declares Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?

Last Answer : The federal government did not enforce the court's decision>:((

Why were the Cherokee forced to move of the supreme court?

Description : Why were the Cherokee forced to move of the supreme court?

Last Answer : Need answer

When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Description : When the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had no legal basis for removing Native Americans from Georgia did President Jackson honor the ruling and end the forced removal?

Last Answer : Need answer

How were the Cherokee powerful group in Georgia?

Description : How were the Cherokee powerful group in Georgia?

Last Answer : Feel Free to Answer

Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Description : Do you think that laws, federal or state, should be examined and ruled on by the Supreme Court as to their constitutionality, before they are passed?

Last Answer : Yes! Great idea. @ragingloli

what power allows the supreme court to declare laws unconstitutional.?

Description : what power allows the supreme court to declare laws unconstitutional.?

Last Answer : The power of judicial review allows the US Supreme Court to declare laws, policies, executive orders and US treaties that are relevant to cases before the Court unconstitutional and nullify them if they violate the principles of the US Constitution.

Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India. (2) There is one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency. (3) The Parliament has the power to make laws relating to the delimitation of constituencies. (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Description : Which one of the following statements about Electoral Government in India is not correct? (1) The superintendence, direction and control of elections are vested in the Election Commission of India ... has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies.

Last Answer : (4) The Supreme Court of India has the authority to scrutinize the validity of a law relating to delimitation of constituencies. Explanation: Under Article 82 of the constitution, ... the delimitation commission demarcates the boundary of parliamentary constituency on the basis of Delimitation Act.

What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Description : What does the "Judicial Review" function of the Supreme Court mean? (1) Review its own judgement (2) Review the functioning of judiciary in the country (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws (4) Undertake periodic review of the Constitution

Last Answer : (3) Examine the constitutional validity of the laws Explanation: The Supreme Court has been given the power to decide whether a law passed by the Parliament or the State legislatures and the executive ... such a law or executive decision is found unconstitutional, then it can declare it as invalid.

What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Description : What is ordinary Law? (1) Laws made by the High Court (2) Laws made by the Supreme Court (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government (4) Laws made by the common people.

Last Answer : (3) Laws made and enforced by the Government Explanation: An ordinary law is a normal law, generally distinguished from a constitutional law. It is made and enforced by the competent authorities of ... to the State and to one another. An ordinary law requires only simple majority in Parliament.

Indian citizen have the right to information because of a) Judgment of Supreme court b) Implementation of international laws by Indian govt c) All states adopted agree to implement the act d) A law passed by the parliament of India

Description : Indian citizen have the right to information because of a) Judgment of Supreme court b) Implementation of international laws by Indian govt c) All states adopted agree to implement the act d) A law passed by the parliament of India

Last Answer : d) A law passed by the parliament of India

Who signs bills to become laws? Choose one: a. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. b. The Vice President. c. The Secretary of State. d. The President.

Description : Who signs bills to become laws? Choose one: a. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. b. The Vice President. c. The Secretary of State. d. The President.

Last Answer : Correct Answer: d. The President.

Who makes federal laws? Choose one: a. Congress. b. The states. c. The President. d. The Supreme Court.

Description : Who makes federal laws? Choose one: a. Congress. b. The states. c. The President. d. The Supreme Court.

Last Answer : Correct Answer: a. Congress.

What are your thoughts on the decision made by the Supreme Court today upholding the rights of gun owners ?

Description : What are your thoughts on the decision made by the Supreme Court today upholding the rights of gun owners ?

Last Answer : The love of guns still exceeds the love of fellow human beings. What a victory!

How does supreme court play the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights? -SST 10th

Description : How does supreme court play the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Fundamental Rights are guaranteed by the Constitution against the action of both the Executive as well as Legislature. Any act of the Executive or of the Legislature which takes away or ... Court is thus the protector, and guardian of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : (i) Habeas Corpus: It literally means to have his body . Habeas Corpus implies that the Supreme Court might issue an order upon a person to produce a prisoner, whom the person has ... or an administrative authority in case they fail to exercise their jurisdiction and fail to perform their duty.

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Description : A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the ... of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Last Answer : (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State Explanation: A sitting judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Both the Supreme Court (Article 139) and the High Courts (Article 226) are empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, ... enforcement of the Fundamental Rights, the high courts can issue writs for other purposes as well.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Description : Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Last Answer : (1) Supreme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal as established by Part V, Chapter IV of the Constitution of India. According to the ... India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the Constitution.

A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (4) Habeas Corpus Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. This procedure of asking the ... release of a person from illegal detention, thereby protecting their fundamental right of life and liberty.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Description : Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Last Answer : (1) Fundamental Rights

In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Description : In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Last Answer : Golaknath Case

Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Description : Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Last Answer : Article32

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

Who amongst the following can be the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)? (a) A serving judge of Supreme Court (b) A serving judge of High Court (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court (d) A retired Chief Justice of High Court

Description : Who amongst the following can be the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)? (a) A serving judge of Supreme Court (b) A serving judge of High Court (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court (d) A retired Chief Justice of High Court

Last Answer : (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court

Which institution is regarded as the guadia of fundamental Rights in India/ a) Supreme Court b) High Court c) Supreme Court and High Court d) None of the above

Description : Which institution is regarded as the guadia of fundamental Rights in India/ a) Supreme Court b) High Court c) Supreme Court and High Court d) None of the above

Last Answer : c) Supreme Court and High Court

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : B) Keshavanand Bharati case

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : (B) Keshavanand Bharati case

What are the laws in place for dumpster diving in Georgia?

Description : What are the laws in place for dumpster diving in Georgia?

Last Answer : That issue is covered locally. You need to check your town ordinances. Generally, if the dumpster is on private property you may be accused of trespassing. The owner can call the police.You can check your municipal code at the link:https://library.municode.com

What are the laws in place for dumpster diving in Georgia?

Description : What are the laws in place for dumpster diving in Georgia?

Last Answer : That issue is covered locally. You need to check your town ordinances. Generally, if the dumpster is on private property you may be accused of trespassing. The owner can call the police.You can check your municipal code at the link:https://library.municode.com

Do Georgia car insurance laws mandate under insured driver insurance?

Description : Do Georgia car insurance laws mandate under insured driver insurance?

Last Answer : The state of Georgia, like all other states, requires that all drivers carry no less than minimum coverage, which is detailed here: http://personalinsure.about.com/cs/vehicleratings/a/ ... Under Insured Motorist coverage: http://www.auto-insurance-claim-advice.com/Georgia-insurance-laws.html

What are the seat belt laws in Georgia?

Description : What are the seat belt laws in Georgia?

Last Answer : The seat belt law in Georgia for people ages 8 to 17 is that a seat belt is required to be fastened in all seats. People who are 18 and above only have to have their seat belt on if they are riding in ... catches a seat belt not on a person in either case, and it is a first offense, the fine is $15.

Is missing a court date in Georgia a misdemeanor?

Description : Is missing a court date in Georgia a misdemeanor?

Last Answer : It is the same as the crime for which you are being charged. Fail to appear for a Felony is is a felony warrant. Fail to appear on a local ordinance charge is a local ordinance warrant with limited extradition.

St at ement I : Shifting cultivation was widely prevalent in different parts of India in the 19th century. St at ement I I : More and more people took to shifting cultivation when forest laws were enacted.

Description : St at ement I : Shifting cultivation was widely prevalent in different parts of India in the 19th century. St at ement I I : More and more people took to shifting cultivation when forest laws were enacted.

Last Answer : 1. Statement I is true, Statement II is false.

Who has the intellectual property rights over an image? The person who took the picture, or the person in the picture?

Description : Who has the intellectual property rights over an image? The person who took the picture, or the person in the picture?

Last Answer : In the Netherlands, the intellectual property rights are reserved to art and new original (intellectual) creations. So for as far as the photo is original / art, its rights will be owned by ... images, in which case the original owner of those rights remains protected, but that should be evident

Recently London High Court granted right to few elderly people to go ahead with their case against government in relation to Mau Mau Rebellion. In which country this rebellion took place? (1) Kenya (2) Libya (3) Ethiopia (4) Republic of Congo

Description : Recently London High Court granted right to few elderly people to go ahead with their case against government in relation to Mau Mau Rebellion. In which country this rebellion took place? (1) Kenya (2) Libya (3) Ethiopia (4) Republic of Congo

Last Answer : (1) Kenya Explanation: The Mau Uprising (also known as the Mau Mau Revolt, Mau Mau Rebellion and Kenya Emergency) was a military conflict that took place in Kenya between 1952 and 1960. ... 21 October 1956 signalled the ultimate defeat of Mau Mau, and essentially ended the British military campaign

Do you think given the opportunity Democrats would steal a Supreme Court seat similar to what McConnell did with Garland?

Description : Do you think given the opportunity Democrats would steal a Supreme Court seat similar to what McConnell did with Garland?

Last Answer : Seems like they’ve let the Republicans deny them one way or another, several times in a row now, no?

So now we have two sexual abusers on the Supreme Court and one in the White House. How will you celebrate?

Description : So now we have two sexual abusers on the Supreme Court and one in the White House. How will you celebrate?

Last Answer : Hmmm…let me think…what did we do when Bill Clinton was elected? We should do that again.

People who have favored Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court Justice, how do you feel about this article?

Description : People who have favored Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court Justice, how do you feel about this article?

Last Answer : The author finds her account more believable than his. But there is no corroboration. No evidence. When even her best friend said she has no memory of this gathering and has never met ... against Kavanaugh. The Atlantic has been running a LOT of anti-Kavanaugh pieces and live interviews lately.

Justice Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court. Should Trump be allowed to nominate another judge, since this is probably his last year in office?

Description : Justice Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court. Should Trump be allowed to nominate another judge, since this is probably his last year in office?

Last Answer : Yes, Trump will nominate another judge. Kennedy's decision to step down could transform the Supreme Court for generations. Trump will have his second opportunity to nominate a justice and will likely ... foreseeable future. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/27/politics/anthony-kennedy-retires/index.html

Can you imagine Clarence Thomas being appointed to the Supreme Court today?

Description : Can you imagine Clarence Thomas being appointed to the Supreme Court today?

Last Answer : Can you imagine Roy Moore being elected to the Senate next month?

Should Gorsuch's plagiarism be considered grounds for his disqualification as a Supreme Court candidate?

Description : Should Gorsuch's plagiarism be considered grounds for his disqualification as a Supreme Court candidate?

Last Answer : He’ll fit right in with the rest of King Trump’s troops.

Does anyone else think that If Clinton wins the election, and the Dems overturn GOP Congressional majorities, Obama will be appointed to the Supreme Court?

Description : Does anyone else think that If Clinton wins the election, and the Dems overturn GOP Congressional majorities, Obama will be appointed to the Supreme Court?

Last Answer : answer:No. He’s a politician, not a jurist. Granted, he taught constitutional law, but he has no experience on the bench. It will never happen.

Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Description : Did the Texas Supreme Court make the right call in this case?

Last Answer : answer:Criminally negligent? No. Child endangerment? Yes. These “parents” (and I use the term only in its biological sense) should lose parental rights. All they have done is raised 9 children who will be incapable of crossing a street, let alone take care of them selves or hold a job.