The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th
by

1 Answer

Answer :

(i) Habeas Corpus: It literally means to “have his body”. Habeas Corpus implies that the Supreme Court might issue an order upon a person to produce a prisoner, whom the person has kept in confinement, before the Court so that the Court may ascertain whether the detention of the prisoner has been made strictly in accordance with law or not. The Court thereby can either set him free or bring about his speedy trial. (ii) Mandamus: It literally means “We command”. This writ is a sort of command from the Supreme Court to a Subordinate Court or an administrative authority in case they fail to exercise their jurisdiction and fail to perform their duty.
by

Related questions

How does supreme court play the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights? -SST 10th

Description : How does supreme court play the Guardian of the Fundamental Rights? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Fundamental Rights are guaranteed by the Constitution against the action of both the Executive as well as Legislature. Any act of the Executive or of the Legislature which takes away or ... Court is thus the protector, and guardian of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Description : Who is the guardian of Fundamental Rights enumerated in Indian Constitution? (1) Supreme Court (2) Parliament (3) Constitution (4) President

Last Answer : (1) Supreme Court Explanation: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal as established by Part V, Chapter IV of the Constitution of India. According to the ... India, the role of the Supreme Court is that of a federal court and guardian of the Constitution.

Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Description : Supreme Court is the guardian for – (1) Fundamental Rights (2) Directive Principles (3) Preamble (4) Centre and State disputes

Last Answer : (1) Fundamental Rights

Why is the Supreme Court said to be the guardian of the Constitution? -SST 10th

Description : Why is the Supreme Court said to be the guardian of the Constitution? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court is known as the guardian of the Constitution as it can issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do? -Do You Know?

Last Answer : answer:

Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Description : Which one of the following subjects comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Court? (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights (2) Mutual disputes among the states (3) Disputes between Centre and States (4) Protection from the violation of the Constitution

Last Answer : (1) Protection of the Fundamental Rights Explanation: Protection of fundamental rights comes under the common jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and high court.

Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Description : Which of the following authorities is/are competent to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) President (2) Supreme Court (3) Supreme Court and High Courts (4) Parliament

Last Answer : (3) Supreme Court and High Courts Explanation: Both the Supreme Court (Article 139) and the High Courts (Article 226) are empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, ... enforcement of the Fundamental Rights, the high courts can issue writs for other purposes as well.

In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court restore the primacy of the Fundamental Rights over the Directive Principles of State Policy? (1) Golaknath Case (2) Keshavananda Bharti Case (3) Minerva Mills Case (4) All the above cases

Last Answer : 3) Minerva Mills Case Explanation: The Directive Principles have been used to uphold the Constitutional validity of legislations in case of a conflict with the Fundamental Rights. Article 31C, added by ... grounds that they derogated from the Fundamental Rights onferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Description : In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable? (1) A. K. Gopalan’s case (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case (3) M. C. Mehta's case (4) Golak Nath's case

Last Answer : (2) Keshvananda Bharti's case Explanation: In 1967, in Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab, a bench of eleven judgcs (such a large bench constituted for the first time) of the Supreme ... case), the "basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment".

Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Description : Which of the following comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Court and the Supreme Court? (1) Disputes between the states inter se (2) Protection against the violation of the Constitution (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights (4) Disputes between Centre and the States

Last Answer : (3) Protection of Fundamental Rights Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution confers the Right to Constitutional Remedies for the protection of Fundamental Rights contained in Part III, It states ... may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Description : A writ issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens is known as – (1) Mandamus (2) Quo Warranto (3) Certiorari (4) Habeas Corpus

Last Answer : (4) Habeas Corpus Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental rights. This procedure of asking the ... release of a person from illegal detention, thereby protecting their fundamental right of life and liberty.

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Description : Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? (1) Article 32 (2) Article 28 (3) Article 29 (4) Article 31

Last Answer : (1) Article 32 Explanation: Right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution empowers the citizens to move a court of law in case of any denial of the fundamental ... issue various kinds of writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari.

In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Description : In which of the following matters, the Supreme Court uphold the importance of Fundamental Rights over directive principles of state policy

Last Answer : Golaknath Case

Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Description : Under which article, any person can go to supreme court in violation of fundamental rights

Last Answer : Article32

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Description : For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, what can the Supreme Court do?

Last Answer : It may issue a writ

Which institution is regarded as the guadia of fundamental Rights in India/ a) Supreme Court b) High Court c) Supreme Court and High Court d) None of the above

Description : Which institution is regarded as the guadia of fundamental Rights in India/ a) Supreme Court b) High Court c) Supreme Court and High Court d) None of the above

Last Answer : c) Supreme Court and High Court

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : B) Keshavanand Bharati case

In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Description : In which case did the Supreme Court of India determine that the Parliament has power to make amendment in fundamental rights, but it cannot make any change in the basic structure of the Constitution? (A) Golak Nath case (B) Keshavanand Bharati case (C) Both (A) and (B) (D) Neither (A) nor (B)

Last Answer : (B) Keshavanand Bharati case

The guardian of fundamental rights is - (1) Judiciary (2) Executive (3) Parliament (4) None of above

Description : The guardian of fundamental rights is - (1) Judiciary (2) Executive (3) Parliament (4) None of above

Last Answer : (1) Judiciary Explanation: Judiciary is the guardian of fundamental rights.

Which one of the following is the guardian of Fundamental Rights? (1) Legislature (2) Executive (3) Political parties (4) Judiciary

Description : Which one of the following is the guardian of Fundamental Rights? (1) Legislature (2) Executive (3) Political parties (4) Judiciary

Last Answer : (4) Judiciary Explanation: Fundamental Rights are those rights and freedoms of the people of India, which enjoy constitutional recognition and guarantee. The Supreme Court of India and State High Courts ... enforced. It empowers the Courts to issue directions or orders or writs for this purpose.

Which of the following statements about the Indian political system is/are correct? (a) The president is both Head of the State and Head of the Government. (b) Parliament is Supreme. (c) The Supreme Court is the guardian of the Constitution. (d) The Directive Principles of State Policy are justiciable. Select the correct answer from the codes given below: (A) (a), (b), (c) and (d) (B) (b), (c) and (d) (C) (b) and (c) (D) (c) only

Description : Which of the following statements about the Indian political system is/are correct? (a) The president is both Head of the State and Head of the Government. (b) Parliament is Supreme. (c) The Supreme Court is the guardian of the ... (d) (B) (b), (c) and (d) (C) (b) and (c) (D) (c) only

Last Answer : Answer: C

Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation and business (2) Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Description : Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a Fundamental Right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such? (1) Freedom of trade, occupation ... any part of the country (3) Freedom of association and union (4) Freedom of the press

Last Answer : (4) Freedom of the press Explanation: The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Description : The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under - (1) Article 14 of the Constitution (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution (3) Article 21 of the Constitution (4) Article 25 of the Constitution

Last Answer : (2) Article 19(1) (1) of the Constitution Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that hoisting the National flag atop the Private buildings is a fundamental right of every citizen under Article 19 (1) (1) of the constitution.

Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme Court is heard by minimum five judges (3) Freedom of press is included in the fundamental right Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Description : Which one the following statements is not correct? (1) The Constitutional Amendment Bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament separately with special majority (2) Constitutional cases in Supreme ... Freedom of speech and expression. (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India

Last Answer : (4) Zakir Hussain was the first Vice President of India Explanation: Dr. Zakir Hussain served as sccond Vice President of India. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan was the first Vice President of India.

Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Description : Point out which from the following is not a right enumerated in the Constitution of India but has been articulated by the Supreme Court to be a Fundamental Right. (1) Right to privacy (2) Equality before law (3) Abolition of untouchablity (4) Right to form associations or unions

Last Answer : (1) Right to privacy Explanation: Judicial activism has brought the Right to Privacy within the realm of Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court of India has construed "right to privacy" as a part of ... conceive to be their duty must strictly and scrupulously observe the forms and rules of the law".

The Supreme Court of India recognizes Fundamental Right as a. Natural right b. Political right. c. Social right. d. All of these.

Description : The Supreme Court of India recognizes Fundamental Right as a. Natural right b. Political right. c. Social right. d. All of these.

Last Answer : b. Political right.

In the 86th amendment to the Constitution in 2002, which of the following was added as a fundamental duty of every citizen of India? a) A parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years b) To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture c) To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities, to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women d) To protect and improve the natural environment including forests, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures

Description : In the 86th amendment to the Constitution in 2002, which of the following was added as a fundamental duty of every citizen of India? a) A parent or guardian to provide opportunities for ... the natural environment including forests, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures

Last Answer : a) A parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years

How does the High Court protect the Fundamental Rights of individuals? -SST 10th

Description : How does the High Court protect the Fundamental Rights of individuals? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The High Court protects the Fundamental Rights from being eroded, infringed upon or abridged by any individual or a group of individuals or the State itself by issuing different writs like Habeas Corpus to the offending parties.

When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Description : When a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the right to move a Court for the enforcement of all Fundamental Rights remains suspended, except - (1) Article 20 and Article 21 (2) Article 21 and Article 22 (3) Article 19 and Article 20 (4) Article 25 and Article 16

Last Answer : (1) Article 20 and Article 21 Explanation: Indian constitution Article 359 of the Constitution authorizes the President of India to suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights during National Emergency except Article 20 and Article 21.

Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Description : Which among the following cannot be challenged in a court of law? (1) Directive Principles of state policy (2) Fundamental Rights (3) Free to choose any profession or business (4) Right to move freely to any part of the country

Last Answer : (1) Directive Principles of state policy Explanation: The Directive principles of state policy are the directions given to the state these cannot be challenged in the court.

Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification

Description : Which of the following can a court issue for enforcement of Fundamental Rights? (1) A decree (2) An Ordinance (3) A writ (4) A notification

Last Answer : (3) A writ Explanation: Under the Indian legal system, jurisdiction to issue `prerogative writs' is given to the Supreme Court, and to the High Courts of Judicature of all Indian states. ... for five kinds of "prerogative" writs: habeas corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.

Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Description : Under which article of Indian Constitution, a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights? (1) Article 15 (2) Article 32 (3) Article 35 (4) Article 226

Last Answer : (4) Article 226 Explanation: Under Article 226 of Indian Constitution a High Court can issue writs to protect the fundamental rights. Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have ... jurisdiction. Article 35 deals with legislation to give effect to the provisions of this part.

What are your thoughts on the decision made by the Supreme Court today upholding the rights of gun owners ?

Description : What are your thoughts on the decision made by the Supreme Court today upholding the rights of gun owners ?

Last Answer : The love of guns still exceeds the love of fellow human beings. What a victory!

What did the supreme court do about laws in Georgia that took away the rights of Cherokee?

Description : What did the supreme court do about laws in Georgia that took away the rights of Cherokee?

Last Answer : It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)

A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Description : A Sitting Judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with - (1) the Governor (2) the Chief Justice of the ... of the concerned State (3) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (4) the President

Last Answer : (2) the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State Explanation: A sitting judge of the High Court or a Sitting District Judge can be appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State.

Who amongst the following can be the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)? (a) A serving judge of Supreme Court (b) A serving judge of High Court (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court (d) A retired Chief Justice of High Court

Description : Who amongst the following can be the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)? (a) A serving judge of Supreme Court (b) A serving judge of High Court (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court (d) A retired Chief Justice of High Court

Last Answer : (c) A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court

Does a guardian ad litem have to be court appointed?

Description : Does a guardian ad litem have to be court appointed?

Last Answer : answer:I just typed in guardian ad litem along with the name of my state into Google and immediately found one near me, along with a lot of information pertaining to guardian ad litem ... cases. In contested custody and visitation cases, the guardian is often selected by the parties' attorneys.

When a state court decides a perpetrator is mentally ill does the state then become the legal guardian of this person?

Description : When a state court decides a perpetrator is mentally ill does the state then become the legal guardian of this person?

Last Answer : Not necessarily. Mental illness does not necessarily mean you can’t make your own decisions.

A minor was facing a criminal prosecution for smuggling drugs. He borrowed Rs. 5000 to hire an advocate to defend him in the court of law. What is the remedy available to the creditor if the minor does not return the money on his own? A. The creditor cannot recover the amount from the minor since a contract with a minor is void ab initio B. The amount of loan can be recovered from minor’s property since it is a loan for necessaries C. The creditor can recover his amount of loan from the minor on his (minor’s) attaining the age of majority D. The creditor can recover his amount from the parent or guardian of the minor

Description : A minor was facing a criminal prosecution for smuggling drugs. He borrowed Rs. 5000 to hire an advocate to defend him in the court of law. What is the remedy available to the creditor if the ... the age of majority D. The creditor can recover his amount from the parent or guardian of the minor

Last Answer : A. The creditor cannot recover the amount from the minor since a contract with a minor is void ab initio

Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name any one Writ issued by the Courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : Habeas Corpus.

Name any two writs issued by the courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name any two writs issued by the courts for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : (i) Certiorari: It is an order by the Supreme Court to the judicial or quasi-judicial authorities to quash its order or decision. Prohibition is issued when certain proceedings are still going on. ... the legality of his holding a public office and ousts him if his claim is not well founded.

Name the courts that are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Description : Name the courts that are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court and the High Court are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of Government Rights.

How has the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights influenced the Fundamental Rights contained in the Indian Constitution? -SST 10th

Description : How has the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights influenced the Fundamental Rights contained in the Indian Constitution? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The first five Fundamental Rights contained in the Indian Constitution had been influenced by the Bill of Rights in the U.N. Charter. It has become obligatory for all member States of the United Nations to ensure these basic conditions to their citizens.

What has the supreme court done to reduce the influence of money and criminals in politics? -SST 10th

Description : What has the supreme court done to reduce the influence of money and criminals in politics? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court has made it mandatory for every candidate who contests elections to file affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him/her.

How many Judges are there in the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Description : How many Judges are there in the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and not more than 25 other Judges.

Who appoints the Judges of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Description : Who appoints the Judges of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The President appoints the Judges of the Supreme Court on the advice of the Chief Justice of Supreme Court.

Who determines the strength of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Description : Who determines the strength of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The Parliament determines the strength of the Supreme Court.

Who can increase the number of Judges of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Description : Who can increase the number of Judges of the Supreme Court? -SST 10th

Last Answer : The number of Judges of the Supreme Court can be increased by the Parliament of India.