answer:Are you seriously wondering? Do you want a serious answer? About how we would need collection enforcers, and if we didn’t have the IRS to do that, we’d probably have much higher administrative costs? And what about matching one person with the right tax level to another with the right need level? More administrative complexity. I really don’t understand what is behind this question. What is the point of having a personal relationship with your donee? And is that valuable enough to raise the cost of providing benefits? I think charity is much easier when the person who benefits is known rather than some kind of anonymous person, and to that degree, I can see some benefit to your proposal. I’m not sure, however, that your way is the way to go about it. I certainly don’t think it would justify the cost.