answer:I would choose all but (a). Science tells me that the sun will rise tomorrow and why. Technology does not. Even if technology is involved in finding out the answer, it is not the telescope itself that gives me an answer. As such, science and technology cannot be equivalent. As for the rest, we know that technology has influenced history. In the US Civil War, for instance, the Union had better weapons than the Confederates. This is one of the advantages that led to the Union winning the war. A similar argument could be made in terms of the atomic bomb. We also know that technology influences science because we’ve seen the rise of new sciences like computer engineering. The evolving state of technology constantly effects the state of science and science education, which in turn contributes to the creation of new technology. It is a self-reinforcing cycle that pushes us to progress ever further. The last two can be demonstrated in various ways, but the simplest way might be to look at the uses to which cameras have been put. Time-lapse photography has been used to study everything from the metamorphosis of butterflies to the deterioration of organic matter, whereas high speed photography has been used to study things like the disease vectors of sneezing.